Re: gcc-4.1 status in unstable

2006-11-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Steve Langasek writes: > Hi Matthias, > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:20:39PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > gcc-4.1 4.1.1-19 in unstable now looks like not showing build time > > regressions compared to 4.1.1-13 in testing, validated on amd64. > > Lucas Nussbaum volunteered to build testing from

Re: gcc-4.1 status in unstable

2006-10-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Matthias, On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:20:39PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > gcc-4.1 4.1.1-19 in unstable now looks like not showing build time > regressions compared to 4.1.1-13 in testing, validated on amd64. > Lucas Nussbaum volunteered to build testing from 2006-10-24 with -13 > and -17, the

gcc-4.1 status in unstable

2006-10-29 Thread Matthias Klose
gcc-4.1 4.1.1-19 in unstable now looks like not showing build time regressions compared to 4.1.1-13 in testing, validated on amd64. Lucas Nussbaum volunteered to build testing from 2006-10-24 with -13 and -17, the results can be found at [1]. The failures are detailed below and supposed to be fixe