Bug#67206: marked as done ([PR optimization/6901] [fixed in 3.5/tree_ssa] optimiser could be improved)

2005-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
5:24 +1000 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:45:24 +1000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc: optimiser could be improved To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.4 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc Version: 1:2.95.2-14 Severity: wishlist Here are a cou

Bug#67206: [Bug rtl-optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables)

2004-05-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 6901 depends on bug 9363, which changed state. Bug 9363 Summary: unused struct literal constants remain http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9363 What|Old Value |New Value ---

Bug#67206: [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables)

2003-12-19 Thread gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Bug 6901 depends on bug 9363, which changed state. Bug 9363 Summary: unused struct literal constants remain http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9363

Bug#67206: [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables)

2003-12-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 6901 depends on bug 9363, which changed state. Bug 9363 Summary: unused struct literal constants remain http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9363 What|Old Value |New Value ---

Bug#67206: [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables)

2003-06-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|

Bug#67206: [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved (removing unused local variables)

2003-06-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|optimiser could be improved |optimiser could be improved ||(removing unused local ||variables) --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

Bug#67206: [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved

2003-06-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-13 11:04 --- Case 1 is fixed. Case 2 is still present in gcc 3.3 and is identical as before. Case 3 is gone as gcc 3

Bug#67206: [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved

2003-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNC

Bug#67206: [Bug optimization/6901] optimiser could be improved

2003-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-27 06:06 --- Hello, would it be possible for you to check whether gcc 3.3 does a better job? If not, if I send you t

Bug#67206: optimization/6901: optimiser could be improved

2002-06-01 Thread gcc-gnats
Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `optimization/6901'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: optimization >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: optimiser could be improved >Arrival-D

optimiser could be improved

2002-06-01 Thread Matthias Klose
>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian Project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: optimization >Class: sw-bug >Release: 3.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable) >Environment