Re: ppl - source package should be versioned

2008-10-08 Thread Matthias Klose
Michael Tautschnig writes: > > Michael Tautschnig writes: > > > > Assume we do build the default gcc depending on a libppl0, now the > > > > libppl soname is changed to libppl1, a new ppl source is uploaded, and > > > > suddendly libppl0 isn't available anymore. And we still need to > > > > rebuild

Re: ppl - source package should be versioned

2008-10-08 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> Michael Tautschnig writes: > > > Assume we do build the default gcc depending on a libppl0, now the > > > libppl soname is changed to libppl1, a new ppl source is uploaded, and > > > suddendly libppl0 isn't available anymore. And we still need to > > > rebuild gcc using gcc. Making the ppl source

Re: ppl - source package should be versioned

2008-10-08 Thread Matthias Klose
Michael Tautschnig writes: > > Assume we do build the default gcc depending on a libppl0, now the > > libppl soname is changed to libppl1, a new ppl source is uploaded, and > > suddendly libppl0 isn't available anymore. And we still need to > > rebuild gcc using gcc. Making the ppl source versioned

Re: ppl - source package should be versioned

2008-10-08 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> Assume we do build the default gcc depending on a libppl0, now the > libppl soname is changed to libppl1, a new ppl source is uploaded, and > suddendly libppl0 isn't available anymore. And we still need to > rebuild gcc using gcc. Making the ppl source versioned (pplX), we > still have the old li

ppl - source package should be versioned

2008-10-08 Thread Matthias Klose
Assume we do build the default gcc depending on a libppl0, now the libppl soname is changed to libppl1, a new ppl source is uploaded, and suddendly libppl0 isn't available anymore. And we still need to rebuild gcc using gcc. Making the ppl source versioned (pplX), we still have the old libppl0 in t