Martin v. Loewis wrote:-
> Neil Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If it's a system header, why are you lying to the compiler?
>
> I'm not lying, I use
You've not told the compiler it's a system header, so it doesn't think
it is. Let me see what Zack thinks.
Neil.
Neil Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If it's a system header, why are you lying to the compiler?
I'm not lying, I use
> Maybe a real-life example and not "a.h" would help.
Ok, here is the real-life example. Consider
#include
int main(){}
which is compiled with
g++-3.1 -MM -I/opt/JBuil
Martin,
If it's a system header, why are you lying to the compiler?
Maybe a real-life example and not "a.h" would help.
Neil.
Neil Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >Description:
> > In gcc 3.1, -MM prints dependencies even to files included with
> > angle brackets (), if those are found through -I options.
> > This behaviour is unintuitive and a change from earlier versions.
>
> Why are you using <> bra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:-
> >Description:
> In gcc 3.1, -MM prints dependencies even to files included with
> angle brackets (), if those are found through -I options.
> This behaviour is unintuitive and a change from earlier versions.
Why are you using <> brackets? Why is #inc
5 matches
Mail list logo
