[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > * Rick Lutowski
> >
> > | (I have heard NS 4.x is 'dead', but it comprises about
> > | 20% of the browser market, and they keep releaseing new
> > | versions -- doesn't sound so dead to me! But it remains
> > | stuck at 1.1 also. Go figure).
> >
> > I have no idea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > * Rick Lutowski
> >
> > | (I have heard NS 4.x is 'dead', but it comprises about
> > | 20% of the browser market, and they keep releaseing new
> > | versions -- doesn't sound so dead to me! But it remains
> > | stuck at 1.1 also. Go figure).
> >
> > I have no idea
I've used Blackdown 1.3.1 a lot on deb/unstable and it's
always run great. Recently setup sun 1.4 (with
extra class lib pulled down as others have noted)
but 1.4 bit by failing to compile all of our code
correctly (largish app, maybe 200 java classes).
Problem showed up as a mis-serialized object
> * Rick Lutowski
>
> | (I have heard NS 4.x is 'dead', but it comprises about
> | 20% of the browser market, and they keep releaseing new
> | versions -- doesn't sound so dead to me! But it remains
> | stuck at 1.1 also. Go figure).
>
> I have no idea where your numbers are from, but my nu
* Rick Lutowski
| (I have heard NS 4.x is 'dead', but it comprises about
| 20% of the browser market, and they keep releaseing new
| versions -- doesn't sound so dead to me! But it remains
| stuck at 1.1 also. Go figure).
I have no idea where your numbers are from, but my numbers (which
con
I've used Blackdown 1.3.1 a lot on deb/unstable and it's
always run great. Recently setup sun 1.4 (with
extra class lib pulled down as others have noted)
but 1.4 bit by failing to compile all of our code
correctly (largish app, maybe 200 java classes).
Problem showed up as a mis-serialized object
> * Rick Lutowski
>
> | (I have heard NS 4.x is 'dead', but it comprises about
> | 20% of the browser market, and they keep releaseing new
> | versions -- doesn't sound so dead to me! But it remains
> | stuck at 1.1 also. Go figure).
>
> I have no idea where your numbers are from, but my n
I just had this problem the other day. The resolution is to do
apt-get install libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
And then you should be all set. Basically, it is an old version of the
library that needs to be in place.
~chuck
-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
* Rick Lutowski
| (I have heard NS 4.x is 'dead', but it comprises about
| 20% of the browser market, and they keep releaseing new
| versions -- doesn't sound so dead to me! But it remains
| stuck at 1.1 also. Go figure).
I have no idea where your numbers are from, but my numbers (which
co
I just had this problem the other day. The resolution is to do
apt-get install libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
And then you should be all set. Basically, it is an old version of the
library that needs to be in place.
~chuck
-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Se
Francois BOTTIN wrote
If you need a file (here you need libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2), you can
find out in which package it is by doing a search at
http://packages.debian.org -> 'Search the contents of packages'. I know
there is also an apt-* command that does the same, but it is not
present in stable
It seems better ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've just had this link :
[host:~] ll /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 31 May 25 10:54
/usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 -> libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10.0.so
Happy Jdk, Alban
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
--- Malcolm Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I',m a newby to Debian and I've tried installing JDK1.4. I got the
> .bin
> file and executed it. This all unpacked fine but when I fire up java
> I get
> the following error:
>
> Error: failed /root/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so, bec
I',m a newby to Debian and I've tried installing JDK1.4. I got the .bin
file and executed it. This all unpacked fine but when I fire up java I get
the following error:
Error: failed /root/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so, because
libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file:
Francois BOTTIN wrote
>If you need a file (here you need libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2), you can
>find out in which package it is by doing a search at
>http://packages.debian.org -> 'Search the contents of packages'. I know
>there is also an apt-* command that does the same, but it is not
>present in
It seems better ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've just had this link :
[host:~] ll /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 31 May 25 10:54
/usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 -> libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10.0.so
Happy Jdk, Alban
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
--- Malcolm Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I',m a newby to Debian and I've tried installing JDK1.4. I got the
> .bin
> file and executed it. This all unpacked fine but when I fire up java
> I get
> the following error:
>
> Error: failed /root/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so, be
I',m a newby to Debian and I've tried installing JDK1.4. I got the .bin
file and executed it. This all unpacked fine but when I fire up java I get
the following error:
Error: failed /root/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so, because
libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file:
20 matches
Mail list logo
