Re: how to convert a .doc file in the context of a package build?

2014-05-13 Thread Jack Hill
A look at catdoc: MS-Word to TeX or plain text converter may also be fruitful. Best, Jack -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1405132

Re: how to convert a .doc file in the context of a package build?

2014-05-13 Thread Paul Wise
If antiword works for the document in question and PS/PDF are acceptable output formats, that could be an option. As far as libreoffice goes, I am using this command successfully (but not in a package build context). libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir . input.ods -- bye, pabs htt

how to convert a .doc file in the context of a package build?

2014-05-13 Thread Paul Elliott
The upstream for my package has created excellent documentation for the package, in the form, Goddess help him, of a .doc file! Well, at least it is GPLed. I have had more trouble, converting this documentation, in the context of a build, to a civilized form, than I ever had building the program

Bug#746620: RFS: sxiv/1.2-1

2014-05-13 Thread Daniel Echeverry
HI Jakub 2014-05-11 14:44 GMT-05:00 Jakub Wilk : > * Daniel Echeverry , 2014-05-10, 14:37: > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sxiv/sxiv_1.2-1.dsc >> > > Don't put two unrelated changes into a single patch. Could you split > allow-cflags-override.diff into two, one for compiler fla

Bug#747438: marked as done (RFS: ckeditor/4.3.5+dfsg1-1 [RC])

2014-05-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2014 16:23:48 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: ckeditor/4.3.5+dfsg1-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #747438, regarding RFS: ckeditor/4.3.5+dfsg1-1 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#746620: marked as done (RFS: sxiv/1.2-1)

2014-05-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2014 16:23:48 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sxiv/1.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #746620, regarding RFS: sxiv/1.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#748021: RFS: bubbros/1.6.2-1

2014-05-13 Thread Juhani Numminen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package “bubbros” * Package name: bubbros Version : 1.6.2-1 Upstream Author : Armin Rigo, David Gowers * URL : http://bub-n-bros.sourceforge.net/ * License : Expat f

Bug#748019: RFS: scribus/1.4.2.dfsg.1+r18267-0.1 [RC, NMU]

2014-05-13 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
X-Debbugs-CC: Andrea Colangelo Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Control: block 741666 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "scribus". My usual sponsor (CC'ed) is busy right now, and this is a NMU for a RC bug (#741666). * Package name: scribus

Bug#726490: marked as done (RFS: ethstatus/0.4.4 [ITA])

2014-05-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2014 10:48:05 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing ethstatus ITA has caused the Debian Bug report #726490, regarding RFS: ethstatus/0.4.4 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i