packaging haskell application

2015-03-26 Thread Richard Ulrich
Hi, I just tried to package a haskell application. I must say I have no experience with haskell whatsoever. All the guidance I found is for libraries: https://wiki.debian.org/Haskell/CollabMaint/PackageTemplate https://wiki.haskell.org/Creating_Debian_packages_from_Cabal_package Trying to adapt

Bug#763853: RFS: python-trezor/0.5.3-1 ITP#763376 Python library for communicating with TREZOR Bitcoin Hardware wallet

2014-10-03 Thread Richard Ulrich
onflicts? Regards, Richard Ulrich signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

install files for python packages

2014-09-26 Thread Richard Ulrich
Do install files work differently for packages that involve python_distutils? When I package C++ stuff, I used install or packagename.install files to suppress certain files, to add certain files to specific locations or to split files among packages. But as soon as I introduce an install file to

Re: Bug#750644: RFS: bitcoin-armory/0.91.1-1 [ITP]

2014-06-06 Thread Richard Ulrich
Hi Joseph, this is great news. I wanted to use armory for quite some time, but since it was missing in the repo, and I couldn't find it in any ppa neither, I hesitated. Could you also make sure it lands in debian packports and a launchpad ppa? That would be great. Rgds Richard Am Donnerstag, de

Re: building debug and release with new style debhelper

2013-04-05 Thread Richard Ulrich
Am Freitag, den 05.04.2013, 14:26 +0600 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:31:43PM +0200, Richard Ulrich wrote: > > > > > > I'm even considering to make the librichbool-dev package depend on > > > > > > the > > > &g

Re: building debug and release with new style debhelper

2013-04-04 Thread Richard Ulrich
Am Donnerstag, den 04.04.2013, 06:42 +0600 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: > > > > I'm even considering to make the librichbool-dev package depend on the > > > > librichbool-dbg package. > > > Note that -dbg packages usually contain only detached debug symbols, and > > > you seem to build two separate

Re: building debug and release with new style debhelper

2013-04-03 Thread Richard Ulrich
Am Mittwoch, den 03.04.2013, 15:38 +0600 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: > > > > The problem I'm facin is that I don't know how to handle the fact > > > > that I want to build debug and release with cmake. > > > > > > I think you should instead drop the debug build, those aren't shipped > > > in Debia

Re: building debug and release with new style debhelper

2013-04-03 Thread Richard Ulrich
Am Mittwoch, den 03.04.2013, 09:33 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: > > > That's not really what I want. The packages I'm building (richbool and > > modassert) are mainly concerned with providing information about failed > > asserts in debug code. So the debug builds are actually more important > > than t

Re: building debug and release with new style debhelper

2013-04-02 Thread Richard Ulrich
Am Montag, den 01.04.2013, 20:46 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: > > The problem I'm facin is that I don't know how to handle the fact > > that I want to build debug and release with cmake. > > I think you should instead drop the debug build, those aren't shipped > in Debian usually. That's not really w

building debug and release with new style debhelper

2013-03-29 Thread Richard Ulrich
Hi gurus, I'm trying to convert an old style debhelper rules file to the new style. The problem I'm facin is that I don't know how to handle the fact that I want to build debug and release with cmake. Here are some relevant parts of the old rules file: build-stamp: configure-stamp dh_

Loading kernel modules

2011-10-10 Thread Richard Ulrich
Hi mentors, I'm in the process of writing and packaging a small application that communicates over gpio pins on the i2c protocol with another device. Now the following page shows what to do during testing. http://blog.famzah.net/2009/12/05/i2c-via-gpio-on-bifferboard-running-debian/ It works dur

/usr/lib64 or /usr/lib

2011-06-09 Thread Richard Ulrich
Hi Mentors, I want to package a library which hast the following lines in CMakeLists.txt IF(CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 8) SET(LIBDIR lib64) ELSE (CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 8) SET(LIBDIR lib) ENDIF(CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 8) now, how do I have to handle this in debian/libxyz.install? Rg

Re: nested ifeq in debian/rules (makefile)

2011-03-03 Thread Richard Ulrich
Hi Joachim, dpk-vendor checks the contents of /etc/dpkg/origins/default. Both are missing on lenny. Trying to call (the missing) dpk-vendor on lenny results in an error. That's the reason I'm checking for file existence. Rgds Richard signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed messa

Re: nested ifeq in debian/rules (makefile)

2011-03-02 Thread Richard Ulrich
Hi Jakub, I played around with the spaces a lot. The result was always the same. ifeq ($(shell[-e /etc/dpkg/origins/default];printf $$?),0) ifeq ($(shell dpkg-vendor --derives-from Ubuntu && echo yes),yes) Rgds Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org w

nested ifeq in debian/rules (makefile)

2011-03-02 Thread Richard Ulrich
Hi, I'm new to debian mentors. A while ago I read a blog article about how to use only one branch for debian and ubuntu packages with different dependencies. http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/09/27/different-dependencies-between-debian-and-ubuntu-but-common-source-package/ I tried to implement it,