In reply to Joey,
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 01:14:11PM +, Alexander Koch wrote:
> Following (even your) comments on IRC and in mails I
> permanently got the (unwritten) message it is a too
> important part of Debian anyway and "we are working
> on it" - thus not giving room to either improvement
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 07:53:25AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> Well, maybe because all but 1 people tried to help technically
> instead of working on the issue on the proper stage. (sorry, can't
> express it like I want).
Assuming there are issues beside the technical one, something I am not
On Tue, 2 November 1999 07:53:25 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Well, maybe because all but 1 people tried to help technically
> instead of working on the issue on the proper stage. (sorry, can't
> express it like I want).
Following (even your) comments on IRC and in mails I
permanently got the (u
> > But the number of people who volunteered to join the NM team was
> > substantial, and yet all were turned down by the then team. However,
> > I think feelings within the project and probably the project itself
> > would have been far more badly hurt by resorting to a vote than by
> > waiting f
On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 02:52:17PM +, Philip Hands wrote:
> Edward Brocklesby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Please offer sensible, well considered, useful comments. Replies from
> > rude, abrasive people (you know who you are) will be ignored.
>
> How very diplomatic of you ;-)
>
> >
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > If you don't like the fact that the Delegates have chosen to close
> > new-maintainer, and are too lazy to actually get off your arse to do
> > the job yourself but not too lazy to make a fuss, then you can use
> [...]
>
> But the number of people who volunteered to join t
On 01-Nov-99, 01:05 (CST), Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > This doesn't do anything to address the real issue (getting
> > new-maintainers back on its feet), and only seems to give people something
> > to point to when whining about how everyone else isn't doin
On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > This doesn't do anything to address the real issue (getting
> > new-maintainers back on its feet), and only seems to give people something
> > to point to when whining about how everyone else isn't doing everything
> > for them.
> If you don't like the fact that the Delegates have chosen to close
> new-maintainer, and are too lazy to actually get off your arse to do
> the job yourself but not too lazy to make a fuss, then you can use
[...]
But the number of people who volunteered to join the NM team was
substantial, and y
9 matches
Mail list logo
