Re: Getting rid of section "base" ?

1999-11-30 Thread Yann Dirson
Goswin Brederlow writes: > > > Interface: tty (stdio, dialog), X11 (Xt, Qt) > > > > Problem I see: we can't sub-classify Xaw and Motif from Xt with such a > > syntax. > > Interface: X11 (Xt (Xaw)) [...] > A Syntax with brackets would save repeating the front part as e.g. in > X11/X1/Xaw

Re: Getting rid of section "base" ?

1999-11-30 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin Brederlow writes: > > Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ... > > > tty > > > tty/stdio > > > tty/curses > > > tty/dialog > > > tty/newt > > > > > > X11 > > > X11/Xt > > > X11/Xt/Xaw > > > X11/Xt/Motif > > > X11/Gtk+ > > > X11

Re: Redhat buys Corel?

1999-11-30 Thread Ben Pfaff
Kenneth Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What would a redhat buyout of corel mean to Debian? It would mean: 1. We wouldn't have to bitch at them every couple of weeks when they screw up a licensing issue, because RH puts everything under GPL. 2. WordPer

Re: Getting rid of section "base" ?

1999-11-30 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 08:02:20PM -0500, Decklin Foster was heard to say: > Goswin Brederlow writes: > > Maybe program should be split up further into stuff like games and > > such. Also where do windowmanagers go? I would like sections for > > games, graphics, utils, interfaces. > > I'd disagree

Re: Getting rid of section "base" ?

1999-11-30 Thread Decklin Foster
Goswin Brederlow writes: > I wuld suggest to use a syntax like this in the Packages file: > Interface: tty (stdio, dialog), X11 (Xt, Qt) Is there a compelling reasoon to make this hierarchical? Why not just have a plain old list such as: text, console, xlib, xaw, motif, gtk, qt, web. For exampl

Re: Travel Assistance (was: Re: Debian at the bazaar?)

1999-11-30 Thread Tom Lees
On Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 10:03:28AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > On 23-Nov-99 Andrew G . Feinberg wrote: > > Guys, > > Steve Blood of The Bazaar has offered to assist as many developers > > as possible with travel expenses. If this would mean that you could come, > > please get in to

Re: Getting rid of section "base" ?

1999-11-30 Thread Yann Dirson
Goswin Brederlow writes: > Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... > > tty > > tty/stdio > > tty/curses > > tty/dialog > > tty/newt > > > > X11 > > X11/Xt > > X11/Xt/Xaw > > X11/Xt/Motif > > X11/Gtk+ > > X11/Gtk+/GNOME > > X11/Qt > > X11/Qt/KDE > > X11/Tk > > I wuld sugge

Re: Getting rid of section "base" ?

1999-11-30 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... > tty > tty/stdio > tty/curses > tty/dialog > tty/newt > > X11 > X11/Xt > X11/Xt/Xaw > X11/Xt/Motif > X11/Gtk+ > X11/Gtk+/GNOME > X11/Qt > X11/Qt/KDE > X11/Tk I wuld suggest to use a syntax like this in the Packages file: Interface: tty (stdio, dialog)