> > Attached is a proposal for dealing with MIA maintainers.
I'd like to see something in there about CC-ing debian-private on some
of those E-mails. Other developers may have information about what's
happened to the MIA.
-itai
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:21:46PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Your times are completely absurd (no offense intended). Plus, I think
> you forgot that if a maintainer emails saying "I
> am going on a sabatical, I will be out for 6 months" they should get
> some leeway.
I just put some numbers
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:58:20PM -0500, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
>
> Attached is a proposal for dealing with MIA maintainers.
Good guidelines. One point: we must always remember to check whether
a maintainer has filled in the "On vacation" field in the DB.
Occasionally, developers are forced t
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:58:20PM -0500, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
>
> Suggested time / minimum activity guidelines:
>
> Package upload once in 4 months
> or
> Active on Debian lists / IRC channels in last 3 months.
> Reasonable reply times for NMU:
>
> Security issues: immediate response ( < 2
Attached is a proposal for dealing with MIA maintainers.
Read, Relax, Enjoy..
At Nils' suggestion, I am posting my proposed guidelines for
dealing with the MIA maintainer problem. There are a number
of grey areas - particularly the length of time someone does
respond to email and has not
"Roland Frans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> binary-i386-1.iso och -2, -3.iso och en som hette:
> binary-i386-1_NONUS.iso. Min fråga är: Vad är skillnaden och vilka
> måste man ta hem?
You need at least one of the -1 iso's. As a european you should use
the NONUS one and get cryptography tools. Th
6 matches
Mail list logo
