Em Tue, 10 Sep 2002 13:46:57 +0300, Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> You mean the Social Contract's last paragraph? I don't think it's
Yes, sorry
> In addition, our non-free section is still much more free than
> the "proprietary software" referred to here. We're not distribut
Em Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:33:35 -0400, Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Sounds to me like they are against, for example, a law that forces
> government agencies to use only Open Source software. They would also be
> against laws that force non-govt agencies to use one form of software or
>
>Freedom to Set Policy
> Individual users, businesses, and government should all be free
> to set their own policies regarding what sorts of software they
> will acquire and use. They should not force their policies upon
> others.
Sounds to me like they
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:37:04AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> it seems like a nice initiative... the only 'principle' helding
> me is this one:
>
> "We assert that Open Source and Proprietary models can be used together
> effectively. A number of our companies deploy software under the
4 matches
Mail list logo
