On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:57:35PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I've had a handful of pretty positive comments by private mail (ha ha
> the lurkers support me in email), which I'm finding encouraging.
I am not sure what purpose is served by making unfalsifiable claims of
support.
Those who support
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:57:35PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think you're mistaken. Take a look at my draft #3, section 4, 3rd
> paragraph. Is this not the kind of thing you wanted ?
I take it you did not see, or did not accept, my apology for
overlooking it.
If the latter, may I ask why?
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:12:56 +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote to debian-devel@lists.debian.org:
[long thread about anarchism]
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:50:02PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> CW>> Interesting as this thread is, could it please be moved to a
> CW>> non-technical li
Jochen Voss writes ("Re: Latest `disputes' draft (#3)"):
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:16:31PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > If you can, refer the other Developer to some documentation saying
> > when they should and should not do something, do so.
>
> Is this a correct english sentence now? I gues
Branden Robinson writes ("Re: Latest `disputes' draft (#3)"):
> This draft appears to have addressed almost none of the issues I raised
> in my feedback to you; not even ones that you explicitly said you'd fix.
Well, perhaps I've addressed them differently to how you were
expecting. I think that
On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 20:42, Murray Kathleen (tel1kam) wrote:
> Would you please be so kind as to tell me what is meant by the term
> "distro"?
A distribution, a collection of software
see http://www.debian.org for a description
> Also, what is "Kmail"?
It's a mail program, just like eudora and
Title: Message
Would you please
be so kind as to tell me what is meant by the term
"distro"?
Also, what is
"Kmail"?
Thanks,
Kathleen
Murray
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:37:44PM +0100, Thomas Quinot wrote:
TQ> This is a very common misconception. Free Software is in fact all
TQ> about asserting and maintaining property rights. The reason why the
TQ> GPL can exist is because society has established the rules of
TQ> property and copyrig
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 08:41:14AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
RC> We are not anarchistic in that sense because we are too sane. ;)
RC> We have some anarchistic tendencies though.
I think that is what we should discuss: instead of holy wars about pros
and cons of anarchism per se, why not take
[ As some people have pointed out, this discussion is non-technical,
hence it belongs to debian-project rather than debian-devel where it was
started. ]
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:10:02PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
GM> Hmmm, good point in theory, i think it happened once to strip power
GM> from
10 matches
Mail list logo
