Very interresting...
I see this as a sympton of a conflict of interrest, which I think has been
around for some time, i.e. there are two main classes of users:
1) The conservative crowd, who are happy with the current situation. In
fact, many of these people probably use debian precisely because
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:13:18AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 12:07:33PM +0100, Rob Adamson wrote:
> > Well, that is the aim. IMHO the version of Samba distributed with woody
> > is buggy to the point of being unsuitable for professional use.
> > [...]
> > woody does not
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 12:07:33PM +0100, Rob Adamson wrote:
> Well, that is the aim. IMHO the version of Samba distributed with woody
> is buggy to the point of being unsuitable for professional use.
> [...]
> woody does not work "out of the box" as a Samba server, and never will.
This is indeed
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 07:46:08AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Remi Perrot wrote:
> > I want, with this mail, to start a campaign on improving Debian
> > reliability.
> >
> > Policy on improving stable release are, in my humble opinion, too
> > restrictive and don't give the opportunity to impr
4 matches
Mail list logo
