What's up, then?
Having tried pills and realizing the importance of sustaining regular
blood levels of the formula through consistent regular dosing, I realized
my life was far too busy to keep track. With this product I simply
slap it on and let it do it.s thing, no muss or fuss.
This patch tr
Ave! :)
Having tried pills and realizing the importance of sustaining regular
blood levels of the formula through consistent regular dosing, I realized
my life was far too busy to keep track. With this product I simply
slap it on and let it do it.s thing, no muss or fuss.
This patch truly rocks
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:13:33PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> I recently conducted a poll on debian-user to get some input from users
> about the FDL issue. The results are available here:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~pyro/fdl_poll_results.txt
>
> And the full mail log is available here:
>
I recently conducted a poll on debian-user to get some input from users
about the FDL issue. The results are available here:
http://people.debian.org/~pyro/fdl_poll_results.txt
And the full mail log is available here:
http://people.debian.org/~pyro/fdl_poll.mail
Here's a summary:
You would, would you?
Having tried pills and realizing the importance of sustaining regular
blood levels of the formula through consistent regular dosing, I realized
my life was far too busy to keep track. With this product I simply
slap it on and let it do it.s thing, no muss or fuss.
This pat
What's up, then?
Having tried pills and realizing the importance of sustaining regular
blood levels of the formula through consistent regular dosing, I realized
my life was far too busy to keep track. With this product I simply
slap it on and let it do it.s thing, no muss or fuss.
This patch tr
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:55:13PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Anyway, this is getting quite off-topic. Please reply off-list, if at
> all.
How are potential consequences of licensing restrictions off-topic (to
-project, anyway)? They seem directly relevant to the question of whether
and why
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:12:27PM +0100, Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > The fact that there is a need for a rebuttal, in the first place, is
> > already a sign that something is very wrong.
>
> I don't argue with that. But when we explain why the GFDL is bad, we
> shouldn't
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 02:35:53PM +0200, tino wrote:
> Warum gibt es nicht eine Version mit Wireless + Realplayer + Skipe + FWD
> IP Telefonclient , das ist doch standard heute. Ohne diese Clienten
> bleibt die Software ab CD immer 2 Rangig ,die CD ist nur zum surfen gut
> wenn auch die standar
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > >* The Invariant Section is retained, but another Invariant Section
> > > containing a rebuttal is added to the document. This would a) look
> > > silly, and b) be a beginning of Invariant Section bloat, in which a
> > > document could consist of 10% Invariant Sections
Matt R Hall writes:
> The GFDL limits make GFDL content less modifiable, with the advantage of
> preventing censorship.
The GFDL has nothing to do with censorship. If some government decides to
ban distribution of the content of an invariant section of a GFDL document
the entire document will bec
Warum gibt es nicht eine Version mit Wireless + Realplayer + Skipe + FWD
IP Telefonclient , das ist doch standard heute. Ohne diese Clienten
bleibt die Software ab CD immer 2 Rangig ,die CD ist nur zum surfen gut
wenn auch die standards verfügbar sind.
DWL 650+ und Netgar und Siemens sind weit
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >* The Invariant Section is retained, but another Invariant Section
> > containing a rebuttal is added to the document. This would a) look
> > silly, and b) be a beginning of Invariant Section bloat, in
13 matches
Mail list logo
