On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 09:19 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> The WNPP page[1] lists about a thousand requests for packages. Do
> these
> RFP bugs serve any purpose these days? We have freshmeat, gnomefiles,
> and other places where to look for new stuff to package.
I recently took a look at them to
Доброе время суток!
На английском уже говорит весь мир. А Вы? Изучи английский с лидерами!
Сегодня со скидками!!!
Звоните в Москве:
один-ноль-пять пять-один-восемь-шесть
156-
Mihailova Orosz Grochal
Windsor Markhassine Sharma Bruno
Knopper Pettersen Vasyukova Simpson
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
No more penis enlarge ripoffs!
http://www.asdokm.com/ss/
The world only goes round by misunderstanding.
Nobody ever died of laughter.
Im good enough, Im smart enough, and dog-gone it, people like me.
To be loved, be lovable.
The wisest mind has something yet to learn.
Software distribution.
http://iuxo.tifqesbmq3ti8ub.pedaryil.com
Every time we say, Let there be! in any form, something happens.
In this life he laughs longest who laughs last.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:48:45AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.28.0755 +0200]:
>>> If you want secure email, encrypt it. Don't depend on the transport.
>> And the envelope?
> I really doubt that you have set up your mail server so t
Hi,
* Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-28 10:18]:
> The WNPP page[1] lists about a thousand requests for packages. Do these
> RFP bugs serve any purpose these days? We have freshmeat, gnomefiles,
> and other places where to look for new stuff to package.
[...]
Yes but e.g. freshmeat i
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.28.0819 +0200]:
> > Does anyone oppose the 365 day maximum age for RFP bugs?
>
> I would say we should drop a line to -submitter in each case and ask
> for (a) updates, and (b) whether they still
also sprach Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.28.1013 +0200]:
> Well, if the RFP is refiled, there's abviously people out there
> who would like to have this package in Debian. I wouldn't call
> the RFP obsolete in that case.
People find alternatives over time.
--
Please do not send co
Hello Lars,
* Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-28 10:18]:
> The WNPP page[1] lists about a thousand requests for packages. Do these
> RFP bugs serve any purpose these days? We have freshmeat, gnomefiles,
> and other places where to look for new stuff to package.
>
> The average age of
Hi Bartosz!
You wrote:
> Adding filter on the website could cause filling these RFPs once again.
> And that's last thing we want. So at least new category at WNPP would
> be nice. Something like "Obsolete RFPs".
Well, if the RFP is refiled, there's abviously people out there who
would like to
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 02:53:21AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday June 19 2005 2:31 am, Simon Huggins wrote:
>
> > You can see on your "blacklist backlash" that JaNET, the UK's
> > academic network is listed as respecting the DUL. Blacklisting via
> > the DUL is a positive measure when co
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:50:47AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Does anyone oppose the 365 day maximum age for RFP bugs?
>
> I would say we should drop a line to -submitter in each case and ask
> for (a) updates, and (b) whether they still want the RFP. Those who
> say no or don't respond are
12 matches
Mail list logo
