Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> One might think private messages are useful in user support, but
> #debian actually has a channel policy asking users not to send them
> without permission. [...]
So, one might think the current #debian is not actually as useful
in user support as it could be?
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An=EDbal Monsalve Salazar dijo [Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:40:49PM +1000]:
> > So, the NM process could then be renamed "Debian Professional
> > Certification".
>
> If you wish to certify somebody as willing to join endless flamewars,
> to idle around in IRC and devo
(keeping CC for the moment. I suggest to keep -project CC'ed as long
as the topic is still close to Google Summer of Code)
Quoting Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> * Gasper Zejn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-02 22:36]:
> > I intend to apply for Google's summer of code for Debian's I18N
> > i
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:50:41AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I'm talking about well after the OFTC formation. If there are that many
> >people dissatisfied with freenode, it seems likely that there are
> How many? Let's add some data to the thread:
i would be inte
> I wonder, do you and the other "me too" people also have a reason to
> justify switching?
How about "Rob Levin is still alive"?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'm talking about well after the OFTC formation. If there are that many
>people dissatisfied with freenode, it seems likely that there are
How many? Let's add some data to the thread:
http://irc.netsplit.de/cgi-bin/ncompare.cgi?n1=freenode&n2=OFTC
The multi-year graphs
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 16:19, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:52:33PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:40, Cord Beermann wrote:
> > > >Why not move it to Jabber? More people use and know what Jabber is
> > > > these days than IRC.
> > >
> > > Jabber does
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'm in favour as well.
I wonder, do you and the other "me too" people also have a reason to
justify switching?
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't have a dog in this hunt, but some of the characterizations here
were a bit off so I thought I should point out some misconceptions.
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:52:33PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Jabber prevents this by providing a real presence system.
> IRC has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The problem is that the high amount of disconnection one gets from freenode
>makes this a pain, especially as it is not clear for clients like irssi when
Do you? This is unusual, I have clients connected to freenode for many
weeks at a time. Maybe we should discuss this o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'm thinking that what he's *really* saying is "there're so many people
>whom I can't talk to this way that it's almost impossible".
Which is hard to believe since he is a registered user who configured
his account to receive messages from unregistered users and so is not
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 15:52 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> By design, IRC encourages people to do truly obnoxious things, like
> spamming
> the channel to announce they're going away, or indicating their status
> with
> nicknames (which also spams the channel).
If *users* announce they're away, i
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:52:33PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:40, Cord Beermann wrote:
> > >Why not move it to Jabber? More people use and know what Jabber is these
> > > days than IRC.
> >
> > Jabber doesn't have any useable non-graphic Clients.
>
> So write one or gr
Paul Johnson writes:
> By design, IRC encourages people to do truly obnoxious things, like spamming
> the channel to announce they're going away, or indicating their status with
> nicknames (which also spams the channel). You also get spammed on IRC
> whenever someone joins or leaves a channel
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:40, Cord Beermann wrote:
> >Why not move it to Jabber? More people use and know what Jabber is these
> > days than IRC.
>
> Jabber doesn't have any useable non-graphic Clients.
So write one or grab one of the existing ones and make it not suck.
> for the usual one
> to
Hello!
I intend to apply for Google's summer of code for Debian's I18N infrastructure
plan. Is there somebody I should discuss this with or should I just submit
the application?
Kind regards,
Gašper Žejn
* Gasper Zejn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-02 22:36]:
> I intend to apply for Google's summer of code for Debian's I18N
> infrastructure plan. Is there somebody I should discuss this with or
> should I just submit the application?
Reviewing the discussions that happened on the debian-i18n list
rec
Hello!
I intend to apply for Google's summer of code for Debian's I18N infrastructure
plan. Is there somebody I should discuss this with or should I just submit the
application?
Kind regards,
Ga?per ?ejn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
* Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060501 23:12]:
> On 10641 March 1977, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>
> > - network stability: oftc annoys with many netsplits lately. This might
> > be temporary, but in the last month it was extreme.
>
> No, some were there, but not more than in Feenode.
Well,
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:24:52PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I get and send a lot of /msg in my debian releated work. for me this is
> To users who have not been long enough on the network to register?
The problem is that the high amount of disconnection one gets
On 4/30/06, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thoughts?
I'm in favour as well.
--
Besos,
Marga
On 2 May 2006, Manoj Srivastava spake thusly:
> I was pretty neutral about whether we should pull
> irc.debian.org away from freenode, but a recent incident makes me
> wonder how developer friendly freenode is anymore.
Apparently, the incident of k-lining me was an errant and buggy
scri
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:34:24PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> >I get and send a lot of /msg in my debian releated work. for me this is
> >> To users who have not been long enough on the network to register?
> >no, not to those and not to those others that feel tha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >I get and send a lot of /msg in my debian releated work. for me this is
>> To users who have not been long enough on the network to register?
>no, not to those and not to those others that feel that they are made to
>jump through hoops and neither to those who left alr
Peter Samuelson wrote:
> And as for Debian development, I receive even fewer private messages
> related to that. Do the rest of you? What aspects of Debian
> development warrant private conversations? I would think most things
> would be appropriate to discuss either in public or in small, focus
Hallo! Du (Paul Johnson) hast geschrieben:
>On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:34, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I've heard it suggested by a variety of people that we should move the
>> official irc.debian.org alias away from freenode to oftc. I can see
>> that more and more of my own Debian IRC discussions a
[This is a mail to multiple lists, please only reply to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], thanks. (Headers should be set for it).]
Dear Mirror-Admin,
we are looking for servers around the world for the streaming video
service of this years DebConf6 in Mexico, where we will (try to) provide
live streaming of the
On Mon, 01 May 2006, stanley jenkins wrote:
> I am looking to advertise with debian.org PLEASE
> FORWARD THIS ON TO THE appropriate person. I am
> looking to have a banner ad or some type of
> advertisment on your site at the following page:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-portuguese/2004/05
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:24:52PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I get and send a lot of /msg in my debian releated work. for me this is
> To users who have not been long enough on the network to register?
no, not to those and not to those others that feel that they a
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 12:36, Jon Dowland wrote:
> At 1146403978 past the epoch, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Why not move it to Jabber? More people use and know what Jabber is
> > these days than IRC.
>
> Really? I'd love to see some figures.
can't find much hard numbers, let along comparisons betwee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I get and send a lot of /msg in my debian releated work. for me this is
To users who have not been long enough on the network to register?
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ottavio Caruso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Well, that's a bit offensive.
Well, my webmail does not allow customised headers
apart from reply-to. If you can suggest me a better
alternative, I'm all ears.
Thank you for your contri
--- Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, the NM process could then be renamed "Debian
> Professional
> Certification".
I'm sorrythe my post has been inserted into the wrong
thread. Some wrong headers on my webmail, perhaps.
And I'm soory I've been interted into the 'bounc
* Petter Reinholdtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060502 13:30]:
>
> [Baruch Even]
> > Mentors should comment and grade proposals on
> > http://code.google.com/soc/debian/open.html
>
> Right. I guess I should have a look then. Just got 'Invalid user'
> when I had a peek now.
You need to be approved b
[Baruch Even]
> Mentors should comment and grade proposals on
> http://code.google.com/soc/debian/open.html
Right. I guess I should have a look then. Just got 'Invalid user'
when I had a peek now.
I've already been contacted by a person interested in working on one
of my proposed projects, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>One might think private messages are useful in user support, but
>#debian actually has a channel policy asking users not to send them
>without permission. As a result, I don't get many private messages
>from #debian users.
ACK.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
At 1146403978 past the epoch, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Why not move it to Jabber? More people use and know what Jabber is
> these days than IRC.
Really? I'd love to see some figures.
--
Jon Dowland
http://alcopop.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:16:14PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:47:22AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>> [Wouter Verhelst]
>> > Only if they're lucky enough to try to ask someone who has
>> > NOIDPRIVMSG disabled.
>>
>> And as for Debian development, I receive even fe
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 05:37:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
>>As has been mentioned on the -project and -private lists, Debian has
>>joined the Google Summer of Code programme, and project ideas are being
>>collected on the wiki [1]. Our participation is being admi
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:47:22AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Wouter Verhelst]
> > Only if they're lucky enough to try to ask someone who has
> > NOIDPRIVMSG disabled.
>
> And as for Debian development, I receive even fewer private messages
> related to that. Do the rest of you? What aspec
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:57:24PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Dom, 2006-04-30 às 13:37 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
> escreveu:
> > > Debian is a volunteer project and has neither the inclination or
> > > capability to run professional certifications, and is not involved or
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:24:15AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > If you want to receive their privated messages then *you* can
> > disable NOIDPRIVMSG and they will not even know about it.
[Wouter Verhelst]
> Only if they're lucky enough to try to ask someone who has
> NOIDPRIVMSG disabled.
W
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>After some discussion earlier in the day about music players,
> ipods, and free software one can flash on ipods, I decided to clean
> up my variant of the Green5 rockbox theme and presented screenshots
> on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>The images are still at
> h
ti, 2006-05-02 kello 10:48 +0200, Marco d'Itri kirjoitti:
> Hardly documented? It's clearly explained in the FAQ page on the web
> site, and a link to this is in the message received by blocked users.
> It does not appear to be hidden to me. Do you have any suggestions to
> improve this?
How does
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >>> I agree with Steve. While I agree that freenode has many flaws (the
>> >>> biggest being NOIDPRIVMSG), I find that while I am in Debian channels on
>> >> Exactly, why is an optional feature such a big flaw?
>> >Because it's the default and practically no one changes
"Matthew R. Dempsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yeah, using stupid, obviously bogus addresses is only acceptable in the
> Mail-Followup-To field:
If your mail client acts on random non-standard headers, it's buggy.
--
MJR/slef
Laux nur mia opinio: vidu http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Bv sekvu http://w
46 matches
Mail list logo
