Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch

2006-08-09 Thread Mats Wichmann
Jeff Licquia wrote: On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 22:07 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: How about the init-scripts? Does LSB say anything about them, or is that a rather optional component? Yes, I had forgotten those; there were conventions in 1.3, but they have changed slightly since then.

Re: How to best reach the users of a package?

2006-08-09 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Roland Mas wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz, 2006-08-05 22:20:08 +0200 : > >> I think this plan, and the overall idea, are both great. > > I have no objection to that either, and I'd suggest apticron and > friends would benefit from that too. I mean, there could be one > channel transmitting various

Re: How to best reach the users of a package?

2006-08-09 Thread Ian Jackson
martin f krafft writes ("How to best reach the users of a package?"): > [stuff] Mail to root is sadly not really useful any more (and anyway, does someone with a cluster of 1000 machines really want 10 mails a week?). And I'm afraid I'm one of those old farts who thinks that everything-over-h

Results for s390 (was Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch)

2006-08-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 10:50 -0400, Jeff Licquia wrote: > Anyone willing to run the tests themselves can contact me for > assistance. Or, if you're willing to give me root access on your > machine to run the tests for you, please contact me. And I have been contacted; thanks to all of you. One pe

Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project

2006-08-09 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:05:38PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Sorry these comments are quite so delayed. > However, given my track record WRT editorial changes to > foundation documents, people ought to be examining this draft > _before_ the vote rather than afterwards :) On behalf