Bug#148034: but it is "critical"

2006-10-25 Thread Lula Taylor
We are living in a time of resource, and those with the mineral wealth are those with the power and money. belongings, gold, oil; all at record highs. It's where you require to be. Our next feature has attained that position, and is now starting heavy mass advertising to let anyone know it. This

Re: dwn futur (take 2)

2006-10-25 Thread Fabrice Lorrain
Andreas Tille a écrit : On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Fabrice Lorrain wrote: As a long time reader of DWN and because there is a "may" in the previous sentence, please reconsider quitting 'cause you were doing a F great job at it and your work was much appreciated. Thanks. I agree with you that

Re: dwn futur (take 2)

2006-10-25 Thread Fabrice Lorrain
Martin Schulze a écrit : Fabrice Lorrain wrote: ...cut... - is translated - the infrastructure are in place and documented [11]. (I discover this page yesterday and I thing it should be more "advertized"). Well.. it's mentioned in every issue... Well, it just proves that I never read D

Re: Proposal to delay the decition of the DPL of the withdrawal of the Package Policy Committee delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Debian Project Secretary
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:01:11 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and >> therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the >> Debian constitution to delay the d

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:50:57PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 10818 March 1977, Michael Meskes wrote: Interesting date Joerg. :-) > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > >> I'm withdrawing the "Package Policy Committee" delegation made by Branden > >> in June la

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Debian Project Secretary
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:34:49 +1000, Anthony Towns said: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> Given that there is no delegated power to change the technical >> policy, I can only see that the technical policy may be changed by >> a GR, or by the technical commit

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Martin Wuertele
Hi Kalle! * Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 14:03]: > Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the > > Do note that such proposals need to be sent to debian-vote to be > effective. And PGP/GPG signed but I'm i

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Do note that such proposals need to be sent to debian-vote to be effective. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Martin Wuertele
* Anthony Towns [2006-10-25 12:49]: > I won't be looking into formally creating a new delegation 'til after > etch has released, at which point I hope we can find at least four > people who'll be active in maintaining policy according to the policy > process we've had for quite some time. Does

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > But since we did have a delegation for almost two years now, [...] (Err, 23 June 2005 to 24th Oct 2006 is 16 months, which doesn't really make "almost two years") Cheers, aj signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 10818 March 1977, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: >> I'm withdrawing the "Package Policy Committee" delegation made by Branden >> in June last year, in: >> ... > Would you care to tell us why? Simple to answer - Manoj has a different opini

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Given that there is no delegated power to change the technical > policy, I can only see that the technical policy may be changed by a > GR, or by the technical committee. 6. Technical committee I think you're mistaken, a

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > I'm withdrawing the "Package Policy Committee" delegation made by Branden > in June last year, in: > ... Would you care to tell us why? Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Ne

Re: dwn futur (take 2)

2006-10-25 Thread Martin Schulze
Fabrice Lorrain wrote: > Hi Joey (Martin Schulze), > > In [1] you wrote "...Please understand that due to this there may be no > future issues of DWN in the current form or that they will only be > released less frequently." > > As a long time reader of DWN and because there is a "may" in the