We are living in a time of resource, and those with the
mineral wealth are those with the power and money.
belongings, gold, oil; all at record highs. It's where you require to be.
Our next feature has attained that position, and is now
starting heavy mass advertising to let anyone know it.
This
Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
As a long time reader of DWN and because there is a "may" in the
previous sentence, please reconsider quitting
'cause you were doing a F great job at it and your work was much
appreciated. Thanks.
I agree with you that
Martin Schulze a écrit :
Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
...cut...
- is translated
- the infrastructure are in place and documented [11]. (I discover this
page yesterday and I thing it should be more "advertized").
Well.. it's mentioned in every issue...
Well, it just proves that I never read D
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:01:11 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and
>> therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the
>> Debian constitution to delay the d
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:50:57PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10818 March 1977, Michael Meskes wrote:
Interesting date Joerg. :-)
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >> I'm withdrawing the "Package Policy Committee" delegation made by Branden
> >> in June la
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:34:49 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Given that there is no delegated power to change the technical
>> policy, I can only see that the technical policy may be changed by
>> a GR, or by the technical commit
Hi Kalle!
* Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 14:03]:
> Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the
>
> Do note that such proposals need to be sent to debian-vote to be
> effective.
And PGP/GPG signed but I'm i
Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the
Do note that such proposals need to be sent to debian-vote to be
effective.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key
* Anthony Towns [2006-10-25 12:49]:
> I won't be looking into formally creating a new delegation 'til after
> etch has released, at which point I hope we can find at least four
> people who'll be active in maintaining policy according to the policy
> process we've had for quite some time.
Does
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> But since we did have a delegation for almost two years now, [...]
(Err, 23 June 2005 to 24th Oct 2006 is 16 months, which doesn't really make
"almost two years")
Cheers,
aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 10818 March 1977, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> I'm withdrawing the "Package Policy Committee" delegation made by Branden
>> in June last year, in:
>> ...
> Would you care to tell us why?
Simple to answer - Manoj has a different opini
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Given that there is no delegated power to change the technical
> policy, I can only see that the technical policy may be changed by a
> GR, or by the technical committee. 6. Technical committee
I think you're mistaken, a
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I'm withdrawing the "Package Policy Committee" delegation made by Branden
> in June last year, in:
> ...
Would you care to tell us why?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Ne
Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
> Hi Joey (Martin Schulze),
>
> In [1] you wrote "...Please understand that due to this there may be no
> future issues of DWN in the current form or that they will only be
> released less frequently."
>
> As a long time reader of DWN and because there is a "may" in the
14 matches
Mail list logo