On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:06:56PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I would greatly appreciate it if people would help the process by
> supporting the efforts of the DSA team consistently rather than heaping
> praise on them when they fix compromises and scorn on them the rest of
> the time. It would
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:06:56PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I would greatly appreciate it if people would help the process by
> supporting the efforts of the DSA team consistently rather than heaping
> praise on them when they fix compromises and scorn on them the rest of
> the time. It would
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 10:43:48PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
> 4) What kind of Debian Project unprivileged admin tasks are so secret
>that discussion thereof must occur in private?
The issue isn't that secrecy is required; just that discussing these
things in public on Debian fora turns into a g
Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 22:06, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> It would also be helpful if there were people who are able to
>> commit time to do significant but boring tasks to help DSA, expecting
>> neither praise, acknowledgement or, most importantly, any a
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 22:06, Anthony Towns wrote:
> It would also be helpful if there were people who are able to
> commit time to do significant but boring tasks to help DSA, expecting
> neither praise, acknowledgement or, most importantly, any additional
> rights/priveleges in return. If
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 08:38:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Would you, as DPL, please try to address the original issue?
Martin, Branden and myself have all been trying to address the original
issue as DPL; messages like the one beginning this thread don't help,
and setting up unofficial aut
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> It is known among debian developers that the Debian System
>> Administration Team (aka DSA or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not
>> really responsive.
> So apparently this complaint was immediately followed up by s
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> It is known among debian developers that the Debian System
>> Administration Team (aka DSA or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not
>> really responsive.
>
> So apparently this complaint was immediately followed up by s
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is known among debian developers that the Debian System
> Administration Team (aka DSA or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not
> really responsive.
>
> Here are a few examples:
> - The machine "escher.debian.org" is locked down [1] for more than 6
>months, I didn't e
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:22:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > It is known among debian developers that the Debian System
> > Administration Team (aka DSA or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not
> > really responsive.
>
> So apparently th
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Running rogue autobuilders does not help Debian in the long term, and
> will only lead to useless tension. The best way to help a lagging port
Running rogue autobuilders as you put it has saved a couple of
architectures and unstuck testing a few ti
[this discussion is off-topic on -devel, please follow-up on -project]
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:51:55PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> How did Aurelien get wanna-build access for his buildd
He didn't, it's a rogue autobuilder. Which is the reason it got
blacklisted.
> or did he not ask for it...
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:07:29PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> At 1166631763 time_t, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > So apparently this complaint was immediately followed up by setting up an
> > emulated autobuilder not synced in with the regular buildd.debian.org
> > stuff [0]. This resulted in James a
At 1166631763 time_t, Anthony Towns wrote:
> So apparently this complaint was immediately followed up by setting up an
> emulated autobuilder not synced in with the regular buildd.debian.org
> stuff [0]. This resulted in James and Ryan adding a quick hack to
> disable arm uploads, which have remain
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:22:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > It is known among debian developers that the Debian System
> > Administration Team (aka DSA or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not
> > really responsive.
>
> So apparently th
Anthony Towns a écrit :
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> It is known among debian developers that the Debian System
>> Administration Team (aka DSA or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not
>> really responsive.
>
> So apparently this complaint was immediately followed up b
Michael Banck a écrit :
> Running rogue autobuilders does not help Debian in the long term, and
> will only lead to useless tension. The best way to help a lagging port
> is to identify arch-specific build failures which need real porting (and
and packages never uploaded, packages never requeued,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:29:41PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:03:35PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Aurelien mailed debian-arm, went to #debian-arm, had no response. He
> > then warn about his intention [1] to run qemu-based autobuilders to fill
> > the gap due t
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 04:27:41PM +, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > So apparently this complaint was immediately followed up by setting up an
> > emulated autobuilder not synced in with the regular buildd.debian.org
> > stuff [0]. [...]
> PS you're missing your footnote.
[0] http://blog.aurel32.net
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:36, MJ Ray wrote:
> Please do not rely on image support, and please do not promote 'just
> use $BROWSER instead' as a solution if you do so.
>
> "1.1 Provide a text equivalent for every non-text element [...]
> This includes: images [...]"
>
> -- the Web Content A
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:03:35PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Aurelien mailed debian-arm, went to #debian-arm, had no response. He
> then warn about his intention [1] to run qemu-based autobuilders to fill
> the gap due to broken arm buildds. He did that on the open, and got ...
> zero answe
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:22:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > It is known among debian developers that the Debian System
> > Administration Team (aka DSA or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not
> > really responsive.
> So apparently this
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> It is known among debian developers that the Debian System
> Administration Team (aka DSA or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not
> really responsive.
So apparently this complaint was immediately followed up by setting up an
emulated autobuil
Hi,
(not really directed at Aurelien personally, but rather talking in
general)
On December 17th, 2006, Aurelien Jarno wrote on his blog:
> As [EMAIL PROTECTED] is everything but responsive (well if you can
> assign a level of responsiveness to /dev/null), I have decided to act. I
> have installe
* Andrew Saunders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061220 16:20]:
> On 12/14/05, Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >actually, NetApp (the storage company) and Intel (the chip
> >manufacture) are solving this problem for us. we get a 7 or
> >10Tbyte storage from NetApp and two beefy servers to us
On 12/14/05, Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
actually, NetApp (the storage company) and Intel (the chip
manufacture) are solving this problem for us. we get a 7 or
10Tbyte storage from NetApp and two beefy servers to use as a
front end for both CD/DVD generation and serving of CDs/DV
26 matches
Mail list logo
