On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 10:34 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > that nothing will happen anymore in Debian stable in the next 24
> > months.
>
> That is sooo not true. Please see the sections "News" and "Security
> Advisories" on this page [1]. This is far
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 10:34 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> that nothing will happen anymore in Debian stable in the next 24
> months.
That is sooo not true. Please see the sections "News" and "Security
Advisories" on this page [1]. This is far from "nothing". If you feel
that some packages in s
Dear all,
There is one fact that I find very true in this article (which
in general takes an unnecessary polemic tone).
Some users, I guess some developpers and contributors, and at
least myself, find it very demotivating to think that a new release
means that nothing will happen
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:39:22AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> 1) there is a bug in etch kernel. (#418344 seems)
>
> While the bug was mentioned in some forums, it was not reported in
> time to BTS. Clearly there are users who find using BTS daunting, and
> thus we don't get bugreports in timely f
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 01:23:11PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> >The subject should be: SJVN flames debian again... does anyone care?
> Yes - as long there are some pure facts we should care.
If you find some facts in there, feel free to summarize them for t
Hello Nico and *,
Am 2007-04-10 14:41:03, schrieb Nico Golde:
> No especially not if I get:
> Configuration file `/etc/subversion/config'
> ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation.
> ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version.
>What would you like to do about it ?
The one WHO had send this messages should DOWNWRITE 100 TIMES
the RFC since the "Message-ID:" header is invalid!
It show: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but it should: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
And then, I like Ice-Cream and the "From:" was jumping directly
into my eyes... :-)
Hap
Hi,
* Philippe Cloutier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-10 16:27]:
> If someone is not satisfied with a problem in Etch, I strongly
> suggest to report the problem and get it listed in errata if
> appropriate.
Sure if it would be reproducable and I could get a bit more
useful information I would d
If someone is not satisfied with a problem in Etch, I strongly suggest
to report the problem and get it listed in errata if appropriate.
Mailing lists are for discussion, not to be a release.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-10 13:22]:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
>
> >The subject should be: SJVN flames debian again... does anyone
> >care?
>
> Yes - as long there are some pure facts we should care.
> I don't come to the same conclusion of the article author bu
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
The subject should be: SJVN flames debian again... does anyone care?
Yes - as long there are some pure facts we should care.
I don't come to the same conclusion of the article author but not to
care is the wrong reaction only because the author is known to fl
Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5673962628.html
> Merely somebody who likes Fedora and (Open)SuSE better than Debian, or
> somebody who has a realistic view of the world? [...]
No, somebody who likes to troll debian almost every chance they get.
I
Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5673962628.html
http://www.acc.umu.se/technical/statistics/ftp/monitordata/index.html
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 08:19:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5673962628.html
> Merely somebody who likes Fedora and (Open)SuSE better than Debian, or
> somebody who has a realistic view of the world? While I'm personally happy
> to use etch, I might be
14 matches
Mail list logo
