Re: linhdd concerns

2007-11-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:19:21PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > or we could disallow the override of >= E: errors in lintian, and make > > lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and > > install windows over your Debian

E-Ticketing your Events

2007-11-28 Thread Ticket Muncher
To Whom It May Concern, This is Dan Gargano - Owner/CEO of www.ticketmuncher.com. I just wanted to give you, promoters, and event planners a heads up that we are now offering a free consulting service to help you sell tickets to your events. Basically, as a company with over 3,000 clients (all

Re: linhdd concerns

2007-11-28 Thread Russ Allbery
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > or we could disallow the override of >= E: errors in lintian, and make > lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and > install windows over your Debian if you override such errors. I'd love it if lintian were at a point wh

Re: linhdd concerns

2007-11-28 Thread Russ Allbery
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One thing we could do is have a seperate report on > http://lintian.debian.org which lists all the lintian overrides (maybe > only those for errors, not for warnings), so they can be peer reviewed > by interested people. I've been wanting to add overri

Re: Please help me remove this

2007-11-28 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 06:29:03PM +, Masood wrote: > Can you please delete this page from your data base: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2003/08/msg00030.html > > It is very embarrassing and very old. It is the first thing that comes up > when searching for my name. Yeah, good ide

Please help me remove this

2007-11-28 Thread Masood
Can you please delete this page from your data base: http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2003/08/msg00030.html It is very embarrassing and very old. It is the first thing that comes up when searching for my name.

Re: linhdd concerns (was: Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring)

2007-11-28 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2007-11-28, Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:23:30PM +, Michael Banck wrote: >> > Another thing we could do is alert sponsors about checking for lintian >> > overrides when they review a pac

Re: Thank You All

2007-11-28 Thread Gunnar Wolf
David VanDuivendyk dijo [Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 03:46:53PM -0700]: > I could not find a relevant address to send this to. I hope that you will > share this with everyone you can. Thank you so much for all the work and > effort to produce *Debian.* I have been using Linux for 5 years and Debian > for

Re: linhdd concerns (was: Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring)

2007-11-28 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Bas Wijnen dijo [Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:51:30PM +0100]: > > or we could disallow the override of >= E: errors in lintian, and make > > lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and > > install windows over your Debian if you override such errors. > > Interesting idea.

Re: linhdd concerns (was: Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring)

2007-11-28 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:54:39PM +, Michael Banck wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > or we could disallow the override of >= E: errors in lintian, and make > > lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and > > install windo

Re: linhdd concerns (was: Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring)

2007-11-28 Thread Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: >> aj, who'd just like to see some failure analysis / air crash investigation >> type conclusions out of this, rather than just "foo sucks and >> shouldn't upload" > > One thing we

Re: linhdd concerns (was: Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring)

2007-11-28 Thread Brett Parker
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:23:30PM +, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > aj, who'd just like to see some failure analysis / air crash investigation > > > type conclu

Re: linhdd concerns (was: Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring)

2007-11-28 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:23:30PM +, Michael Banck wrote: > > Another thing we could do is alert sponsors about checking for lintian > > overrides when they review a package. > > or we could disallow the override of >= E: er

Re: linhdd concerns (was: Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring)

2007-11-28 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:23:30PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: >On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: >> aj, who'd just like to see some failure analysis / air crash investigation >> type conclusions out of this, rather than just "foo sucks and >> shouldn't upload"

Re: linhdd concerns (was: Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring)

2007-11-28 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > or we could disallow the override of >= E: errors in lintian, and make > lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and > install windows over your Debian if you override such errors. Are you routinely ove

Re: linhdd concerns (was: Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring)

2007-11-28 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:23:30PM +, Michael Banck wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > aj, who'd just like to see some failure analysis / air crash investigation > > type conclusions out of this, rather than just "foo sucks and > > shouldn't uplo

Re: linhdd concerns (was: Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring)

2007-11-28 Thread Michael Banck
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > aj, who'd just like to see some failure analysis / air crash investigation > type conclusions out of this, rather than just "foo sucks and > shouldn't upload" One thing we could do is have a seperate report on http://lintian

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-28 10:55]: > > > mips and mipsel have more buildds (mayr and mayer) but one has > > > problems with its fan and the other with its psu. I don't know what > > > is being done about this as the RT ticket is

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-28 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-28 10:55]: > > mips and mipsel have more buildds (mayr and mayer) but one has > > problems with its fan and the other with its psu. I don't know what > > is being done about this as the RT ticket is not public (or at least > > wasn't last time I check

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-28 08:32]: > > Are there any known plans to add buildds for these arches and > > especially for mips and mipsel? If not, could we please make that a > > priority for the project? > > mips and mipsel have more b

Aki Esta as Fotos Que Prometi Mandar...

2007-11-28 Thread luanna1989
Oie!! tudo bem? eu esqueci de mandar as fotos! agora tá ai!! Beijao! anexo: photos.gif (15kb) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

كتاب كل ما شافه رجل قال م� �كن نسخه لزوجتي

2007-11-28 Thread sh44.com
= sh44.com = كتاب جديد كل ما شافه رجل قال ممكن اخذ منه نسخه لزوجتي http://sh44.com/vb/showthread.php?t=167 === ... FOOTER === http://www.sh44.com/vb Unsubscription : http://alwwn.com/subscription.php?li

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-28 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-28 08:32]: > Are there any known plans to add buildds for these arches and > especially for mips and mipsel? If not, could we please make that a > priority for the project? mips and mipsel have more buildds (mayr and mayer) but one has problems with its fan