Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo?

2012-09-20 Thread Clint Adams
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:31:55PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > For reasons I won't elaborate on here (they would drive us far away > from the topic under discussion), I consider the GNU GPL v3 as a > license with a broken copyleft mechanism (at least for some aspects). > > Hence, whenever I wan

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo?

2012-09-20 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:17:53 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 09:31:41PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > I am following up to your August bits from the DPL, since I still have > > to understand why it was suggested to dual license the Open Use Logo > > "with Debian" under