Le Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:34:52PM +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
>
> In the meanwhile, what I was proposing was that the licensing of the
> Debian Open Use Logo should not create a deliberate incompatibility
> with either the GPLv2 or the GPLv3.
Hi Francesco,
The Debian Open Use Logo without «
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Version française à la fin du mail --
Hello Everyone,
The Debian France association[1] is proud to announce the next
Mini-DebConf[2]! This year's event will take place on November 24th
and 25th, _where_ Debian enthusiasts from far and wide will
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:00:08 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:31:55PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > There are two issues with your previous reply:
> >
> > * it was not clear that your request for more info also included
> > questions about the particular copyright
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:52:58 + Clint Adams wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:31:55PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > For reasons I won't elaborate on here (they would drive us far away
> > from the topic under discussion), I consider the GNU GPL v3 as a
> > license with a broken copyleft me
4 matches
Mail list logo
