On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 11:42:50PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> So, if someone is not using Github's "advanced" features, like pull
> requests and so on, why that person would care about using Github more
> than using Salsa?
While I personally think that using something else than Salsa is not
Hi Ole,
Thanks for your reply.
On 10/4/19 8:18 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Thomas Goirand writes:
>> On 9/13/19 2:35 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> It's based on a false premise. No one is forced to use any VCS to
>>> maintain Debian packages. If you don't want to talk to GitHub, send
>>> a pat
On 2019-10-05 5:12 a.m., Martin Michlmayr wrote:
[...]
My only concern with the automatic $100 is the workload it may cause
for TOs, but this might not be a huge problem since a) many people
won't bother submitting a claim since it's not worth their time
(automatically selecting those who real
Since we're on the topic of travel expenses.
* Didier 'OdyX' Raboud [2019-10-03 13:42]:
> I realize I had not read https://wiki.debian.org/Sprints/HowTo recently; my
> bad. It has:
> > Debian, within the limit of available resources, tries hard to cover travel
> > and accommodation costs for thos
* Sam Hartman [2019-10-02 10:43]:
> If that ends up being the case I'm happy with some sort of automatic
> approval process for DDs attending BSPs (and easy approval for other
> contributors when that makes sense).
I might be wrong here but my understanding of the $100 for attending
BSPs that exi
On 2019-10-02 at 10:43:37 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> TL;DR: Do we want BSP organizers to take on the responsibility of
> batching together travel reimbursement requests.
> [...]
> Asking BSP organizers to help with this is great from the DPL side.
> The only concern is if it pushes the effort
6 matches
Mail list logo
