as well as removes some of the
package-centric approach the old structure had.
If you have a chance please look at that and send me (CC me pls) any
comments/suggestions.
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:05:06AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo écrivait:
> > Unfortunately I do not yet have any other co-maintainers --
> > volunteers, anyone?
>
> I'm volunteering. I'm going to spend some time on it bu
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > > > I was hoping to get libpkg-guide (library packaging guide) into
> > > > Developers Reference, although the terms and language is quite
> &g
til I was done, leaving the other
bits to other co-maintainers.
Unfortunately I do not yet have any other co-maintainers --
volunteers, anyone?
Again,
[1] ==
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2002/debian-qa-200201/msg00062.html>
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
replies, I don't always have time right now to keep up
with all the mailing lists ...
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>
o woody which are not there yet (busybox,
python2.1-xml, libnewt0, whiptail) so that the package can be built
from woody.
If you have comments, suggestions, etc, please email
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have some tunnel vision right now and
am not really reading other lists at this time.
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>
You guys should also know that http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/
(errata section) has a pointer to this as well.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>
"Young, Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am computer science major at Regis University currently taking an
> operating system class. I have a project do either an a operating system or
> comparing operating systems. I was curious if you could send me some
> information on the nuts and bolts of
John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Isn't this a violation of previous common practices? I thought that
> unstable's disks-* directories were always symlinked to stable's until the
> unstable bootdisks were ready.
It's better not to pretend, I think. I asked that they remove the
unstable on
I dont' know if anyone's tracking this, but I'd be happy to give away
addressbook (tcl/tk app) to a new maintainer.
Also, tdtd which is a pretty simple emacs lisp pkg.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What process(es) must be followed to start a Debian dist for a new
> architecture??
[...]
> As I can't find any web documentation which describes the process I
> thought i'd gather comments (flames or otherwise) from this group on any
> issues etc which may arise from
Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What are the reasons for ever not letting new maintainers in?
There are none, I agree.
I'm very disappointed that Wichert has failed to reopen New
Maintainer. This is the biggest failure of his tenure thus far, IMHO.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTEC
I'm sorry, I really don't care to discuss release engineering and how
we engineer releases. I think we all agree it's currently broken and
has to be fixed. But I'm too busy actually working to make things
happen to be involved in whatever planning is going on (the package
pool thing, I suppose)
>IMO, the purpose of freezing is to stabilize. I don't care much if Debian is
>stable before the freeze, just so long as it freezes. Yes, a short freeze is
>good, but better a long freeze than an interminable unfrozen unstable.
I don't make the decision.
I personally feel that a *feature-compl
David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, how are we doing? Last thing, we were waiting on boot floppies.
> It seems as if we are moving further away from "release mode".
> Anything that can be done to help besides work on boot-floppies?
Perl-base is bug-riddled. Modconf is bug-riddled. T
15 matches
Mail list logo
