Re: Google summer of code

2005-06-01 Thread Duncan Findlay
e the place to start. -- Duncan Findlay signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: New Front Desk members

2005-01-31 Thread Duncan Findlay
ngs like > > > > - How have they contributed to Debian already? > - How has your sponsoree contributed ...? I'm pretty sure that isn't a word. -- Duncan Findlay signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: people.d.o to help free java

2004-12-22 Thread Duncan Findlay
relatively minor in comparison, so I suspect it's fine. If you plan on doing stuff that's a whole lot more elaborate, you might want to consider it though. -- Duncan Findlay signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4

2002-11-10 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 05:17:55PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Duncan Findlay writes ("Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4"): > > Other considerations, many of these are taken from Branden Robinson, > > whose e-mails you don't seem to read anymore: &g

Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #5

2002-11-06 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:01:55AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > This is my current working draft. As ever, do please send this list, > or me privately, any substantive comments you have on it. Will you please look at my suggestions? They still apply. Thanks, -- Duncan Findlay

Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable

2002-11-06 Thread Duncan Findlay
have no humour gene. > > >> hoping I have made my point, > > Anthony> That you're an idiot? Well, yes. > > I can see just how well this conflict resolution document is > going to be. I can now see just how important this conflict resolution document is going to be. -- Duncan Findlay

Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4

2002-11-05 Thread Duncan Findlay
nal downward spirals it implies. A GR can't really be used to force people to change the way the behave toward others. These are _guidelines_ and _suggestions_. If this document were taken to a GR, and even if it succeeded, those who didn't like it will simply ignore it. -- Duncan Findlay pgpr7JP9B54kc.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4

2002-11-05 Thread Duncan Findlay
re, as they are relatively clear, like sentence clarifications or improvements. I've attached two diffs. The first is with the -b option, and the other without. I've changed the spacing between sentences to 1 space, so that explains the difference. Thanks, -- Duncan Findlay --- disputes.ol

Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me

2002-11-04 Thread Duncan Findlay
hink this argument is somewhat pointless (and quite ironic). The argument right now is: "Ian Jackson, and some other members of debian-project, say that everyone should try to get along, in a way that he proposes. Branden Robinson, and some other members of debian-project insist that we get along

Re: Latest `disputes' draft (#3)

2002-10-28 Thread Duncan Findlay
correct english sentence now? I guess the ", do so" > should be removed. Either the first comma or the ", do so" should be removed. The latter is stronger. But the sentence as a whole is rather weak. -- Duncan Findlay pgpFSUrCg1O5k.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Is work on Debian community service?

2002-09-22 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:33:42AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.12.0624 +0200]: > > Do you think work for the Debian project should be considered > > Community Service? How about work only indirectly for Debian (i.e.

Re: More ands more advertising

2002-09-17 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:58:03PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: > Perhaps someone would like to go through the archives and separate a > large amount of spam and nonspam so that we can create Debian-specific > scores for use on the mailing lists. (Upstream has tools to generate > the

Re: More ands more advertising

2002-09-17 Thread Duncan Findlay
chives and separate a large amount of spam and nonspam so that we can create Debian-specific scores for use on the mailing lists. (Upstream has tools to generate the scores - I'd run them if someone did the separation work) -- Duncan Findlay

Re: Is work on Debian community service?

2002-09-12 Thread Duncan Findlay
l, play around, > and ask general questions. > > I've done that a couple of times and it was very successful. That's an interesting idea, but I don't think I'd want to do that. I'm a bit of a "closet developer" -- my parents don't even know what Debian is! -- Duncan Findlay pgpoXuOgeVHPW.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Is work on Debian community service?

2002-09-12 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:35:36PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:24:01AM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: > > Do you think work for the Debian project should be considered > > Community Service? > > I don't think there's a universal definition

Is work on Debian community service?

2002-09-11 Thread Duncan Findlay
y like to hear the opinions of other developers and members of the Debian community. Regardless of the outcome of this discussion, I'm certain I'll be able to get the required 50 hours, and I'm sure it will have no effect on my continued work for Debian. Thanks, -- Duncan Findlay pgpJAz5N0CCHC.pgp Description: PGP signature