Re: Developers vs Uploaders

2007-03-18 Thread Erinn Clark
* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:03:18 12:36 +0100]: > On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Erinn Clark wrote: > > - It's not obvious what problems it's meant to be solving > > > > Is it meant to be a stepping stone for NM? Prevent sponsor(ee) burnout > &g

Re: Developers vs Uploaders

2007-03-18 Thread Erinn Clark
* Anthony Towns [2007:03:15 04:22 +1000]: > If people don't do a good job as a "maintainer" they should have their > priveleges removed fairly promptly; and if a developers recommends > people to be listed as maintainers who turn out to be a problem, or if a > developer just doesn't stay around t

Re: Third call for votes for the debian project leader election 2006

2006-04-06 Thread Erinn Clark
* Benj. Mako Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:04:06 15:35 -0400]: > > > Scripsit "Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I think that the fact that the upload keyring is the same as the > > > voting keyring is bad. Contributors are told they can't vote until > > > they learn C compiler fla

Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce

2006-01-18 Thread Erinn Clark
* MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:01:18 21:22 +]: > Erinn Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Were I a listmaster, that would've > > been one of my considerations, regardless of what he'd done to justify > > the ban. I think it's potentially importan

Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce

2006-01-18 Thread Erinn Clark
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:01:18 20:23 +0100]: > Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Joerg Jaspert writes: > >> On 10538 March 1977, Martin Schulze wrote: > >>> Since this mail also mentions Andrews sarcastic posting > >>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-anno

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-13 Thread Erinn Clark
* Josh Rehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:12:12 12:52 -0800]: > You read the transcript: are you saying that you think your fellow > operator acted rightly? As a fellow #debian operator, I have to say that I did agree with his actions and probably would've been less patient. -- off the chain li

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-11 Thread Erinn Clark
* Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:12:11 16:32 -0800]: > On Saturday 10 December 2005 12:07 pm, Josh Rehman wrote: > > > As for being warned, I was told that because my discussion was about > > ubuntu I should stop. Because I felt my discussion was not about > > ubuntu, I did not feel that

Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

2004-03-09 Thread Erinn Clark
One time on Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:24:08AM -0800 this person named Jonathan Walther wrote: > I don't believe the treatment you receive in channel #debian is > representative of how women are treated in the project itself, by actual > developers. The Debian developement team, including myself, ha

Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

2004-03-05 Thread Erinn Clark
One time on Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:50:06PM -0500 this person named David Nusinow wrote: > You can plug your ears and shout "It's not real!" all you want, but that > doesn't make it so. Exactly. BTW, for those of you who don't already know, I'm the helix from IRC. I want to say a few things and