Re: "Debian" Core Consortium

2005-08-07 Thread Ian Murdock
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-26 05:33]: > >>Re the organization formerly known as the Debian Core Consortium: No >>need. We won't use the word Debian in the name--we'll call >>ourselves the DCC Alliance, where DCC sta

Re: "Why" Debian Core Consortium ? Why not UserLinux? Why not Debian?

2005-08-07 Thread Ian Murdock
to work within the existing Debian framework to the largest extent possible. I just figured coming in *assuming* any of that as a forgone conclusion would be seen as presumptuous. -- Ian Murdock 317-578-8882 (office) http://www.progeny.com/ http://ianmurdock.com/ "A nerd is someone who uses a

Re: "Debian" Core Consortium

2005-07-26 Thread Ian Murdock
n Core". Re Debian having a more restrictive trademark policy than Linux: Let's definitely talk about that. (I'm not on these lists, so please CC me on all correspondence.) -- Ian Murdock 317-578-8882 (office) http://www.progeny.com/ http://ianmurdock.com/ "A nerd is someone

Re: "Debian" Core Consortium

2005-07-24 Thread Ian Murdock
Stephen Frost wrote: > * Ian Murdock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>Lest this be misinterpreted, let me clarify that the DCC >>group will abide by whatever Debian's trademark policy is. "My >>response" has to do more with how that trademark >>policy appears

Re: "Debian" Core Consortium

2005-07-24 Thread Ian Murdock
Stephen Frost wrote: > * Ian Murdock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>Ok, this is most unexpected, so I'm going to have to take >>some time to consider my response. I can say with 100% certainty that >>a trademark policy more restrictive than the one adopted by Linus >&

Re: "Debian" Core Consortium

2005-07-24 Thread Ian Murdock
Lest this be misinterpreted, let me clarify that the DCC group will abide by whatever Debian's trademark policy is. "My response" has to do more with how that trademark policy appears to be inconsistent with Debian's founding goals. -ian Ian Murdock wrote: > Ok, this is

Re: "Debian" Core Consortium

2005-07-24 Thread Ian Murdock
rost wrote: > * Ian Murdock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>Martin Michlmayr wrote: >> >>>* Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-24 07:25]: >>> >>> >>>>As always, feedback welcome. We're not trying to step on any toes. >>>

Re: "Debian" Core Consortium

2005-07-24 Thread Ian Murdock
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-24 07:25]: > >>As always, feedback welcome. We're not trying to step on any toes. > > http://www.educ.umu.se/~bjorn/mhonarc-files/debian-announce/msg00083.html Thank you, I'm aware of this

Re: "Debian" Core Consortium

2005-07-24 Thread Ian Murdock
luding the word "Debian" in the name of the thing. >From my point of view, this follows standard practice for allowable usage of other names--you know, like Debian GNU/Linux. ;-) ^^^ ^ As always, feedback welcome. We're not trying