ant hope that
the various things I've griped about in the past WRT ftpmaster may be
resolved by this, or at the
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 12:55:39PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 09:06:36PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> - uploads to NEW need an advocate in addition to the normal signature
>
full account set and to deal with scripting and ' are no longer the
same thing (especially since it sounds like, in practice, this split is
already in existance), which is why I think the NEW queue (pre-filter?)
team is perhaps a sol
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 09:06:36PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Now, if the reason is because everyone involved in ftp-master has more
> > crucial tasks to do with getting Sarge out the door, that would be one
> &
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:55:37PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:38:07PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
>
> > One of my 'real problems' is a completely stalled NEW queue; secondhand
> > comments indicate that vorlon may have implied that it
an.org/devel/ somewhere under
> "Teams" or something?
Please!
Matthew, by the way: I don't know that I
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 02:21:14PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:33:17AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer not to imagine, of course; either he, or anyone in the ftpmaster
> > role, could say " gave him the details", and, voila,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:26:50PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Joel Aelwyn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050220 06:50]:
> > As was noted in another email, I have never worked with any other volunteer
> > organization where "the right to do no work" translated into "the ri
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:55:03AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer not to imagine, of course; either he, or anyone in the ftpmaster
> > role, could say " gave him the details", and, voila, I wouldn'
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 04:52:41PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 08:08:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >>What's sad is that even as Martin Krafft seems to be sincere in wanting
> >>to apologise and get on with thin
situation is
already such that there
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:27:52PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 11:53:47AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >>martin f krafft wrote:
> >>>Maybe we should tabulate most commonly bashed roles and see if there
> >>&
swers to us.
Vote based on what you care about.
(Disclaimer: I'm not campaigning for any DPL candidate; I haven't even
looked to see if any platforms
ewhere, and I have missed it, a poi
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 03:41:51PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:04:36 -0700, Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > *) English common usage (rather than formal usage) is rapidly and
> > widely adopting "singular they" (m
h" (or should
that be Anglish? How much of it i
lar they (if you can't read
the sentance out loud with a straight face, this is a bad choice), or
restructuring the sentance to not need a pronoun in that spot.
The first of those tends
17 matches
Mail list logo
