able to present our Stunning New Release Strategy to the
rest of the project.
--
It's not true unless it makes you laugh,
but you don't understand it until it makes you weep.
Eukleia: Jonathan Walther
Address: 12706 99 Ave, Surrey, BC V3V2P8 (Canada)
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:17:17AM +0300, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 06:19:41PM -0700, Jonathan Walther wrote:
Both of my Debian t-shirts, the original one with the GNU and the
Penguin, and the later one with the Aladdins Lamp logo, had to be thrown
out. They are both Fruit
er and not being able to wear the t-shirt.
Who is in charge of Debian t-shirts which we sell at various
expositions, fairs, and events?
Jonathan
--
Patriarchy, Polygamy, Slavery <=> Fatherhood, Husbandry, Mastery
Puritan: Purity of faith, Purity of doctrine. Sola Scriptura!
Eukleia: Jonathan
lity are giving you a headache. The
headache could go away quite easily; just open your eyes and reexamine
your commitment to hundred year old ideologies.
Jonathan
--
Patriarchy, Polygamy, Slavery <=> Fatherhood, Husbandry, Mastery
Puritan: Purity of faith, Purity of doctrine. Sola Scriptur
general Debian-Welcome project?
Jonathan
--
Patriarchy, Polygamy, Slavery <=> Fatherhood, Husbandry, Mastery
Puritan: Purity of faith, Purity of doctrine. Sola Scriptura!
Eukleia: Jonathan Walther
Address: 12706 99 Ave, Surrey, BC V3V2P8 (Canada)
Contact: 604-582-9308 (between 8am and 9pm, PST)
Website: http://reactor-core.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e. Sola Scriptura!
Eukleia: Jonathan Walther
Address: 12706 99 Ave, Surrey, BC V3V2P8 (Canada)
Contact: 604-582-9308 (between 8am and 9pm, PST)
Website: http://reactor-core.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t good logic based on real facts to make any dint in your attempts
to remake Debian in the mould of your ideology du jour.
Jonathan
--
Patriarchy, Polygamy, Slavery <=> Fatherhood, Husbandry, Mastery
Puritan: Purity of faith, Purity of doctrine. Sola Scriptura!
Eukleia: Jonathan Walther
Ad
erhood, Husbandry, Mastery
Puritan: Purity of faith, Purity of doctrine. Sola Scriptura!
Eukleia: Jonathan Walther
Address: 12706 99 Ave, Surrey, BC V3V2P8 (Canada)
Contact: 604-582-9308 (between 8am and 9pm, PST)
Website: http://reactor-core.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
We just need to be civil.
I prefer my fellow Debian brothers to develop rhinocerous hides. :-)
--
Eukleia: Jonathan Walther
Address: 13685 Hilton Road, Surrey, BC V3R5J8 (Canada)
Contact: 604-951-4142 (between 7am and 10pm, PST)
Website: http://reactor-core.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
contrary: the strong know their own strength and don't need to flex
their muscles all the time.
I don't appreciate the way you are always "flexing your muscles" and
accusing your fellow DDs of being sexist. Maybe try showing some
respect for people other than yourself.
J
n that my pet dog is not
allowed to vote in the US presidential elections. Down with
discrimination!
Jonathan
--
Eukleia: Jonathan Walther
Address: 13685 Hilton Road, Surrey, BC V3R5J8 (Canada)
Contact: 604-951-4142 (between 7am and 10pm, PST)
Website: http://reactor-core.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 01:12:26AM +0100, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
IIRC, the point Susan brought up at Debconf2 after the numerous "so
easy your grandmother can use it" references was, "why always the
"grand*mother*?" Fact is, these little references paint the person as
stupid, or unskilled, or som
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:58:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:11:06PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
To say that is to fly in the face of our entire legal infrastructure.
Qui tacet consentit means "Silence gives consent" or some such. He was
"silent&
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:09:27AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi, Jonathan Walther wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:37:47AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
EOT. *plonk*
I guess that means you concede my point. Thanks for reading.
*ROTLF* No, it means that _you_ concede the point
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:37:47AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
EOT. *plonk*
I guess that means you concede my point. Thanks for reading.
Jonathan
--
Address: 13685 Hilton Road, Surrey, BC V3R5J8 (Canada)
Contact: 604-951-4142 (between 7am and 10pm, PST)
Website: http://reactor-core.org
s
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:26:54AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I don't see the point of your ongoing uterine fixation in this discussion.
It doesn't seem to support your argument. "Women bear children, and men do
not, and therefore I am paying them a favour in treating them as
intellectually an
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:38:31AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:06:32PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
To the contrary, it is equalitarians that treat people inhumanely;
expecting too much of some, and denigrating the abilities of others. Do
you expect a man to bear
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:37:54AM +, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Gentlemen treat women with greater gentleness and with less
expectation than they do their fellow men. A gentleman, for
instance, would not think to lift a fellow man over a rain puddle,
but would instantly offer such assistance to
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:06:32PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:05:54PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
Gentlemen treat women with greater gentleness and with less
expectation than they do their fellow men. A gentleman, for
instance, would not think to lift a fellow
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:04:58AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
People cannot usefully participate in a debate unless they grow a
skin, or while they are emotionally attached to an argument.
True, assuming ...
Providing
crutches for them will only make things worse.
... that it's an argum
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:19:02AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
1. Don't pander to us just because we're women.
Why not? There are standards of civility, and those standards include
acting like a gentleman.
... towards *everybody*, not just towards women.
Which is exactly her point.
Gen
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:10:28PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Certainly, the kind of harrassment documented here:
http://www.p12n.org/misc/sexism/
is not something that I would consider acceptable
I am glad you posted those logs. Now I see I was right, this whole
thing is blown way out of
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:14:08AM -0500, Erinn Clark wrote:
Perhaps they were not developers but the channel is a Debian resource.
Most people do not meet the developers before they consider becoming
one, or, in fact, when they first begin using Debian. It's an
off-putting environment, and not j
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:44:24AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:46:13AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:26:47AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
>Jonathan Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:19:29AM -05
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:26:47AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Jonathan Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:19:29AM -0500, Erinn Clark wrote:
2. Don't flirt with us just because we're women.
Impossible. More than 90% of the worlds men use tha
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:19:29AM -0500, Erinn Clark wrote:
The topic being discussed was the lack of women in Debian and I felt it
proper to provide some anecdotal evidence for the treatment some of us
have received.
I don't believe the treatment you receive in channel #debian is
representati
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:26:23AM -0500, Lukas Geyer wrote:
Lukas, I see that you are coming from a position of a lot of hurt and
pain. I empathize with your suffering. How can we list-members help
you out?
My suffering in this case was mostly caused by your posting, so
probably the best you
Lukas, I see that you are coming from a position of a lot of hurt and
pain. I empathize with your suffering. How can we list-members help
you out?
Jonathan
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:07:53AM -0500, Lukas Geyer wrote:
Jonathan Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:34:23PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 12:22:44PM +1300, Mike Beattie wrote:
Matt, I hate to burst your bubble, but IRC is not real life, and in the
grand scheme of things it really doesn't matter - we do not control what
people say or do. We canno
29 matches
Mail list logo
