-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Okay, hopefully the final language change:
>
> Proposal is to change section 2.1.5 of the Debian policy to say:
>
>Non-free programs with cryptographic program code must be stored
> on
>the "non-us" server because
Robert Thomson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 10:41:39PM +, Tim Haynes wrote:
> > Robert Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > So long as you don't mail a CD, cross a border, or force-feed to a mirror
> > > in one of the 7 victim countries, then you're fine.
> >
> > But, if you don't m
Robert Thomson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 01:10:55PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > > * DFSG free programs with crypto can be made and (re)distributed
> > > from the US now, as long as you don't consciously export it to
> > > one of 7 countries which are on a s
Radovan Garabik wrote:
> AFAIK France has lifted the restriction two years ago (or so)
That's good to hear.
> > all conditions and there are countries for which exports from the US are
> > still
> > restricted (Iran, Irak, .). We would have to deal with these special
> > situations, but I th
Hi all
I would just like to know the current status of non-US within Debian. Now, since
the US export regulations for cryptographic software have been weakened, we
might be able to include cryptographic software in the main distribution,
eliminating non-US completely (well maybe not completely, th
Mariusz Przygodzki wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 27 December 2000 19:32, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > I propose to stop the current NM process and to reorganize it.
> >
> > "... let's do the time warp a-gain!".
> >
> > (Ok, so I'm behind on email, but this is giving me cold sweats.)
>
Hi all
I am pleased to announce the first pre-release of the Gibraltar project. It is a
Debian-based firewall/router. The software runs completely from a bootable, live
CD-ROM that contains everything needed to build a firewall/router. Log files can
be stored on a harddisk partition, configuratio
Anthony Towns wrote:
> I imagine this ammendment would be best as a separate option on the
> ballot to the original proposal, and as such it will require five seconds.
Seconded, if it just would count :)
(another plea to the new-maintainer team - no, just kidding, I will wait
until all of you th
> They neglect to mention that Debian is already highly successful at
> encouraging non-free software authors to relicense, that distributing
> software as non-free rather than part of the distribution itself is
> already a successful disincentive, that often it is the maintainer of the
> non-free
, as it happened to logcheck after I convinced the author
to make it free.
best greets, and PLEASE do not split Debian - it would only harm both
sides
Rene Mayrhofer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo