LDP people needs help (Re: problems)

2001-01-26 Thread Taketoshi Sano
currently subscribe this list. Please cc me if you wish to reach me. Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Current delay to registration (Re: RFC: Changing the NM system)

2001-01-04 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Sat, 30 Dec 2000 18:50:41 +0100, Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 30 December 2000 03:27, Taketoshi Sano wrote: > > It was longer from May to August, IIRC. One of my applicant had waited > > 2 or 3

Current delay to registration (Re: RFC: Changing the NM system)

2000-12-29 Thread Taketoshi Sano
, so max "waiting for DAM" days would be basically less than one month. But the order of the process may be affected the time of initial application sending time as well as the final report sending time. So prediction is difficult. I presume that the current delay may be affected by the i

Re: RFC: Changing the NM system

2000-12-18 Thread Taketoshi Sano
er. This does not necessarily > mean to make it easier to become a developer, it could suffice to make it > easier for non-developers to contribute by removing technical barriers. > This also includes making it possible for people with little time and/or > knowledge to participate. Maybe the well-created "quiz" will work to lower the barriers, I hope. Regards. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Record of application (Re: long term goals of debian membership)

2000-12-06 Thread Taketoshi Sano
e time for developers to insult each other on debian-devel. It's your life, so it's you to decide what to do. I agree that helping answer questions on debian-user list is certainly a kind of contribution. Regards. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: recommends approval of "Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer"

2000-09-25 Thread Taketoshi Sano
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on "Sun, 24 Sep 2000 19:22:48 +0200", with "Re: recommends approval of "Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer"", Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: wichert> Previously Taketoshi Sano wrote: wichert> > 1) If

recommends approval of Benoit Joly

2000-09-24 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Final report on Benoit Joly to NM-Committee by Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = ID --- Benoit provided his GPG key which is signed by a current member of the Debian, Remi Lefebvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I asked Remi about Benoit, and he

recommends approval of "Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer"

2000-09-24 Thread Taketoshi Sano
This is a final report on "Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer" to NM-Committee by Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = ID --- forcer provided his GPG key which is signed by two current members of the Debian, Oliver M. Bolzer and Oth

Re: AM Mini-HOWTO

2000-09-22 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on "Fri, 22 Sep 2000 11:31:35 +0200", Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 06:19:19AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote: > > > Our seb sites are generated from wml, so I don't think sgml works well

Re: AM Mini-HOWTO

2000-09-21 Thread Taketoshi Sano
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on "Thu, 21 Sep 2000 11:07:36 +0200", with "Re: AM Mini-HOWTO", Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: csurchi> On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 01:12:30PM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote: csurchi> csurchi> > Well, since the HOWTO

Re: AM Mini-HOWTO

2000-09-21 Thread Taketoshi Sano
I may also submit patches from time to time, based on > people's comments Thanks. I'll commit your revised version. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: key signing coordination page [e9625136@student.tuwien.ac.at: Re: becomming a debian developer (fwd)]

2000-09-17 Thread Taketoshi Sano
ter. Perhaps Chuan-kai Lin can work for this when he will passed and will be registered as a member of Debian. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: AM Mini-HOWTO

2000-09-17 Thread Taketoshi Sano
w Maintainers' Corner", but it may take longer time since I'm very busy recently. I plan to create a new page as devel/join/nm-amhowto for this text (your AM HOWTO), and to put a link to it on nm-amchecklist. Is this OK ? Thanks. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: The Debian New Maintainer process

2000-09-17 Thread Taketoshi Sano
the applicant does not have the signed key, then he/she has to provide the scanned/digitized photo-image of some identification, as same as the old way. This is written on our "New Maintainers' Corner". Please check the step2. (http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-step2) -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Update on "New Maintainers Corner" web page

2000-09-17 Thread Taketoshi Sano
; message with the full > explanation for those who want/need it. I don't know where that link is. If anyone know, please send it to me. Will move them from nm-step2 into nm-amchecklist. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: nm-admin/nm-discuss@cipsa.physik.uni-freiburg.de superseded

2000-09-06 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Dale has asked me to close > down the service on cipsa.physik.uni-freiburg.de now. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Note on photo-ID (Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme)

2000-08-05 Thread Taketoshi Sano
ments like driver's licences or passports > is illigal in Germany, just like scanning money. Maybe other countries have > similar laws. I have committed in cvs to add some note on photo-ID into nm-step2 page. If you have some proposal to improve that text, then please let me know. Thanks. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process)

2000-08-03 Thread Taketoshi Sano
the current scheme of NM team will stop working too. I'm afraid that. Regards. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

2000-08-02 Thread Taketoshi Sano
member of the "family" of the Debian, and can be proud of it (Think of our brave & beloved, espy). This is the privilege, or honor for being a member of the Debian, I think. # in exchange for the hard work on the packages or the tasks in the project. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL

Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

2000-07-30 Thread Taketoshi Sano
potential as this possibility does not currently exist > in closing the "eyeball" section. For the record, I won't object this proposal (in fact, I prefer this). I know the decision is not under my control at all, of course. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fear the new maintainer process

2000-07-26 Thread Taketoshi Sano
that idea. We don't have much resources (even the mailing list for the new NM team has not been provided on the Debian's server. Maybe it will be done after the release of the potato) and we must concentrate on the processing itself to handle the huge pipeline in front of us. Regards.

Re: Fear the new maintainer process

2000-07-26 Thread Taketoshi Sano
st mail. And I wrote that I need your reply soon in that mail. But it does not matter for me. If you can respond, then I can start the processing of your application. Please concentrate to the required things. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please reply soon, or I could not proceed (Re: how to be arude bastard?)

2000-07-26 Thread Taketoshi Sano
for the time that applicant will apply his/her again. If you have any proposal, then please let me know. I'll work for improvement for the description on our web page <http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint> Thanks. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Thanks for your information (Re: Please reply soon, or I could notproceed)

2000-07-26 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi, all! In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Wed, 26 Jul 2000 13:31:22 +0900, on Thanks for your information (Re: Please reply soon, or I could notproceed), Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > on "Wed, 26 Jul 2000 01:47:28 +0200&q

Re: Fear the new maintainer process

2000-07-26 Thread Taketoshi Sano
to be extremly worried about the new maintainer > procedure. Maybe. > On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 01:31:22PM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote: > > (There are several applicants who > > does not respond at all, or holding the process for months and > > finally decide not to join the pro

Thanks for your information (Re: Please reply soon, or I could notproceed)

2000-07-25 Thread Taketoshi Sano
# In fact, I haven't know his name because I don't have much interest # in development of Hurd. I know just only the name of that kernel... -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please reply soon, or I could not proceed (Re: how to be a rudebastard?)

2000-07-25 Thread Taketoshi Sano
I have been waiting your reply for more than two weeks. I wonder you have gone away off from the network, but since you can post your mail on our mailing list, I think you can reply to me soon. Or, have you NOT recieved any my mails ? Please check your entry in "NM list" on <h

Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal)

2000-07-10 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Seconded. In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, at 09 Jul 2000 16:28:52 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Indeed, now that it appears to be a matter of interpretation, > with two wildly different interpretations, I would not be averse to > clarifying the language in the c

Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free

2000-07-02 Thread Taketoshi Sano
emove non-free > * create a `pure' version of www.debian.org and ftp.debian.org > * move non-free to something like debian-nonfree.org or whatever you name it. I prefer the second one (having "pure" version) as I wrote some months ago. (If the proposed vote was for the second o

Re: in or out of the distribution (Re: An ammendment (Re: FormalCFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free))

2000-06-13 Thread Taketoshi Sano
work for our admin team, and I'm not so eager for this myself. This is just a feasibility study. Regards. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian is about providing the best free operating system

2000-06-12 Thread Taketoshi Sano
e discussion about this GR has some meaningful effect. But if we lose our users, we will lose our chance to teach people about freedom, it will take "just the first step" from us. I have read the story about "The battle in the Sabbath" somewhere in the Old Testament. People

Re: Some more reality..

2000-06-11 Thread Taketoshi Sano
. (They includes: asiya24-vfont, watanabe-vfont, dvi2ps-fontdata-ja, konfont, xfonts-a12k12, xfonts-cjk, xfonts-intl-japanese, xfonts-intl-japanese-big, xfonts-kaname, and xfonts-marumoji) -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --

Re: Removing non-free - reality check.

2000-06-11 Thread Taketoshi Sano
ROTECTED]>, at "10 Jun 2000 18:55:15 -0500", John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "Does Debian include non-free software?" > > "Any of the Debian packages itself doesn't incl

Re: Removing non-free - reality check.

2000-06-10 Thread Taketoshi Sano
on-free software on Debian. Now, many free softwares have been actively developped, and some of us can live perfectly only with the official Debian distribution (i.e. don't need the contrib and non-free). But, can we believe now that "effectively compete in the commercial market" does not need the existence of "non-free" area ? We are here to change the world, not to please the limited party. Regards. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A User's View on Non-Free

2000-06-08 Thread Taketoshi Sano
n use -devel-announce for only announcement. Do not forget to add "Reply-To: " header appropriately. Thanks. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: new maintainers

1999-12-31 Thread Taketoshi Sano
by some "regional helpers", who are living in the same time zone/country as an applicants. Wichert's proposal may admit of their interfacing. P.S. I am a relatively new member, and maybe I don't get enough faith from others, but I will work as an interface to handle 1) and 2) if admitted. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Data does NOT belong in Debian (was: Stop Archive bloat)

1999-10-21 Thread Taketoshi Sano
eferences for the size of packages, such like "If the size of your package go over 10MB (or 100MB or 1GB or bigger of even smaller value we consider apropriate), then you should consult other members before you upload it" Then we can know that package and discuss about it. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>