On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:10:33PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Of course, they will apply their personal criteria in order to do so,
> > and they will not be able to remove it from external archiving sites.
>
> You do know that the person you're replying to is a listmaster, right?
> (Just check
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:48:32PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I would still apply the second paragraph I just re-quoted - We are not
> under obligation to remove it. Now, if someone posted a list of valid
> WinXP license numbers to our lists, the listmasters would probably
> delete it. And if some
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:48:32PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Neither of those two documents say that we will keep all postings on
> > the archives, or that we will remove them, they just say that we will
> > if we want to.
>
[...]
> seem to address your doubts...
No, they don't really. In cas
> Neither of those two documents say that we will keep all postings on
> the archives, or that we will remove them, they just say that we will
> if we want to.
Ummm...
All emails sent to the lists are distributed both to the list
subscribers and copied to the public archive, for people to b
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:26:51PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Pascal Hakim dijo [Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:39:39PM +1100]:
> > > > This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial
> > > > use, duplication and distribution.
> > > > ---
Pascal Hakim dijo [Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:39:39PM +1100]:
> > > This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial
> > > use, duplication and distribution.
> > > ---
> >
> > This email is non-DFSG. We need to remove it from the list
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 06:36:18PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Paul Hampson wrote:
>
> > This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial
> > use, duplication and distribution.
> > ---
>
> This email is non-DFSG
7 matches
Mail list logo
