Re: [Utnubu-discuss] Re: Ubuntu/Debian cooperation [was: Complaint about #debian operator]

2005-12-16 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Joachim Breitner wrote: > I don't think there is much gain - an attached patch is not much better > than a link, and might annoy people with limited bandwidth. It is *MUCH* better to attach a patch than to paste a link, unless as others said, you're talking about > 1MB *compre

Re: [Utnubu-discuss] Re: Ubuntu/Debian cooperation [was: Complaint about #debian operator]

2005-12-16 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:19:58PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.12.2005, 16:13 -0500 schrieb Joey Hess: > > Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > I don't think there is much gain - an attached patch is not much better > > > than a link, and might annoy people with limited

Re: [Utnubu-discuss] Re: Ubuntu/Debian cooperation [was: Complaint about #debian operator]

2005-12-15 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:00:22PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > (I just got the mails to utnubu-discuss, so bear with me) > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.12.2005, 15:39 +0100 schrieb Sven Luther: > > The process was to be manually though, the idea is to scan incoming mails to > > the BTS, w

Re: [Utnubu-discuss] Re: Ubuntu/Debian cooperation [was: Complaint about #debian operator]

2005-12-15 Thread Joey Schulze
Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 15.12.2005, 15:39 +0100 schrieb Sven Luther: > > The process was to be manually though, the idea is to scan incoming mails to > > the BTS, which would notice an URL to an ubuntu patch, and auto-attach it > > (and > > complain loudly to the submitter if

Re: [Utnubu-discuss] Re: Ubuntu/Debian cooperation [was: Complaint about #debian operator]

2005-12-15 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 15.12.2005, 16:13 -0500 schrieb Joey Hess: > Joachim Breitner wrote: > > I don't think there is much gain - an attached patch is not much better > > than a link, and might annoy people with limited bandwidth. > > It's SOP in Debian to attach patches to bug reports. I might

Re: [Utnubu-discuss] Re: Ubuntu/Debian cooperation [was: Complaint about #debian operator]

2005-12-15 Thread Joey Hess
Joachim Breitner wrote: > I don't think there is much gain - an attached patch is not much better > than a link, and might annoy people with limited bandwidth. It's SOP in Debian to attach patches to bug reports. I might consider doing otherwise if the patch exceeded 1 megabyte. (And yes, I'm on

Re: [Utnubu-discuss] Re: Ubuntu/Debian cooperation [was: Complaint about #debian operator]

2005-12-15 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, (I just got the mails to utnubu-discuss, so bear with me) Am Donnerstag, den 15.12.2005, 15:39 +0100 schrieb Sven Luther: > The process was to be manually though, the idea is to scan incoming mails to > the BTS, which would notice an URL to an ubuntu patch, and auto-attach it (and > complain