"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 03:33:15PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
>>
>> The suggestion wasn't to remove the addresses, but to "mask" them.
>> That would still allow you to lookup the sender addresses if you
>> wished. eg "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -> "fo
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 03:33:15PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
>
> The suggestion wasn't to remove the addresses, but to "mask" them.
> That would still allow you to lookup the sender addresses if you
> wished. eg "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -> "foo at com.example".
>
> I'd strongly second the propos
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 07:49:56PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > (I'm deliberately ignoring smtp-time checks..)
>
> I don't think you should be. According to my recent stats, I
> only accept about 25% of the mail thrown at my server (half of the
> rest is rejected as Spam, the ot
On Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:21:23 +, Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 12:00:36PM -0300, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
>> Recently we had this thread about public emails in Debian
>> lists/BTS:
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/08/msg00123.html
> Thank
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 12:00:36PM -0300, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
> Recently we had this thread about public emails in Debian lists/BTS:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/08/msg00123.html
Thanks for the link.
> If you agree, consider using bogofilter, I've used it (client-si
Hi Steve,
On Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:33:15 +
Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> The suggestion wasn't to remove the addresses, but to "mask" them.
> That would still allow you to lookup the sender addresses if you
> wished. eg "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -> "foo at com.example".
Recently
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 03:33:15PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> The suggestion wasn't to remove the addresses, but to "mask" them.
> That would still allow you to lookup the sender addresses if you
> wished. eg "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -> "foo at com.example".
As humans can read this, computers can
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 04:11:41PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Javier Candeira wrote:
> > Regardless of past disclaimers and policies, would it be possible in the
> > future to do some masking of email addresses in online archives?
>
> I strongly oppose thi
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Javier Candeira wrote:
> Regardless of past disclaimers and policies, would it be possible in the
> future to do some masking of email addresses in online archives?
I strongly oppose this suggestion. It is frequently needed to e-mail
the author of a mailin
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi Pierre!
>
> On Sun Dec 03, 2006 at 01:45:36 +0100, pierrero wrote:
>> I've posted messages in one of your Debian lists from from my business
>> email address and I start to receive spam.
>> It is very sad since I had succeeded with preserving of any indexing by
>> th
Hi Pierre!
On Sun Dec 03, 2006 at 01:45:36 +0100, pierrero wrote:
> I've posted messages in one of your Debian lists from from my business
> email address and I start to receive spam.
> It is very sad since I had succeeded with preserving of any indexing by
> the spam robots :-(
The Debian-Listar
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 01:45:36AM +0100, pierrero wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've posted messages in one of your Debian lists from from my business
> email address and I start to receive spam.
> It is very sad since I had succeeded with preserving of any indexing by
> the spam robots :-(
>
> The only s
From: paul-debian A.T. home.paulcager.org
You may also want to try contacting the debian-www list;
they might be able to do it.
Regards,
Paul
---
Hello,
I've posted messages in one of your Debian lists from from my business
email address and I start to receive spam.
It is very sad since I h
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 01:27:04AM +0100, pierrero wrote:
>
> And also this one please
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-french/2006/11/msg00182.html
>
>
> ---
>
> Hello,
>
> I've posted messages in one of your Debian lists from from my business
> email address and I start to receive spam.
Hello,
I've posted messages in one of your Debian lists from from my business
email address and I start to receive spam.
It is very sad since I had succeeded with preserving of any indexing by
the spam robots :-(
The only site which proposes my address email is yours, so I am about
sure that i
And also this one please
http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-french/2006/11/msg00182.html
---
Hello,
I've posted messages in one of your Debian lists from from my business
email address and I start to receive spam.
It is very sad since I had succeeded with preserving of any indexing by
the sp
16 matches
Mail list logo
