Re: Interoperability among .deb implementations

2000-07-02 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Chris Lawrence wrote: > Whether or not the proposed GR passes, I believe we need to figure out > some way of coordinating the Debian-based distributions so we do not > end up in an "RPM" type of situation where supposedly common formats > lead to highly inconsistent systems. Oh great,

Re: Interoperability among .deb implementations

2000-06-11 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Jun 11, Jules Bean wrote: > > 3. Some agreement that redistributed packages will not be gratuitously > > repackaged or modified, > > Sign them, if that's important? I don't think it's a signature thing. It's more a problem of downloading packages, making minor tweaks to the package, and then

Re: Interoperability among .deb implementations

2000-06-11 Thread Jules Bean
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 11:46:31PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: > > 1. Some sort of way to identify the source of a package. Maintainer Yes. > 2. Some master registry of package names. Yes. Or, a namespace mechanism. So that package: bind in namespace:corel is really package corel/bind, not

Interoperability among .deb implementations

2000-06-09 Thread Chris Lawrence
Whether or not the proposed GR passes, I believe we need to figure out some way of coordinating the Debian-based distributions so we do not end up in an "RPM" type of situation where supposedly common formats lead to highly inconsistent systems. Here's what I think is needed: 1. Some sort of way