Re: Searching for specific Debian logo

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 03:54:45AM -0400, Alex Taylor wrote: > Hello, > > I am searching for this specific Debian icon > > featured on the taskbar in qvwm

Searching for specific Debian logo

Hello, I am searching for this specific Debian icon featured on the taskbar in qvwm , an old window manager originally released in 1996. Is there an

Re: Debian logo

On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:40:07PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 11:03:08AM -0400, Joshua Allen wrote: > > Dear debian, > > I was wondering if the logo was inspired by bdale garbee's tie dye shirt? > > > > Thanks > > Josh >

Re: Debian logo

Quoting Andrew M.A. Cater (2021-11-05 17:40:07) > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 11:03:08AM -0400, Joshua Allen wrote: > > I was wondering if the logo was inspired by bdale garbee's tie dye > > shirt? > It was subject to a Debian vote in 1999 - > https://wiki.debian.org/De

Re: Debian logo

On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 11:03:08AM -0400, Joshua Allen wrote: > Dear debian, > I was wondering if the logo was inspired by bdale garbee's tie dye shirt? > > Thanks > Josh It was subject to a Debian vote in 1999 - https://wiki.debian.org/DebianLogo "The chicken" was

Debian logo

Dear debian, I was wondering if the logo was inspired by bdale garbee's tie dye shirt? Thanks Josh

Re: Debian Open Use Logo inquiry

mg.com/564x/8d/55/f4/8d55f465b6ad23f5ecbec8b50b899161.jpg). Looks like she is selling handcrafted bags... > You didn't say what kind of business she is using the > logo for, though - if it does involve software development or IT then > there may be the risk of confusion. ... so no risk of c

Re: Debian Open Use Logo inquiry

nding this e-mail to inform you that the Debian Open Use Logo is > being used by a professional as a composite of her own logo branding ( > https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/8d/55/f4/8d55f465b6ad23f5ecbec8b50b899161.jpg). > This logo has been used in her official contracts, transaction

Debian Open Use Logo inquiry

Good day! I don't know where this type of message should be sent to, so I figured this would go into the general section. I am sending this e-mail to inform you that the Debian Open Use Logo is being used by a professional as a composite of her own logo branding ( https://s-media-cach

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Possible Two Color Debian Logo White Vinyl Sticker Group Buy

"Paul R. Tagliamonte" writes: > I think Debian FR made a bunch - > http://www.enventelibre.org/documents/autocollant-debian > > 8 cm x 10 cm. - 4" x 4". They're prefect for the back of a thinkpad. Looks like the one on my notebook is actually about 4.5" tall .. I don't remember where it came fro

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Possible Two Color Debian Logo White Vinyl Sticker Group Buy

;> >>> I think these are going to be closer to US$5-10 per for larger ones, but >>> I'm interested in getting a few of them myself. >> >> I work with a US supplier of cut vinyl decals for the Altus Metrum logo, >> I'll ask him for a quote on plai

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Possible Two Color Debian Logo White Vinyl Sticker Group Buy

th a US supplier of cut vinyl decals for the Altus Metrum logo, > > I'll ask him for a quote on plain swirls in a size or two. > > I got a *great* quote on 2, 3, and 4 inch height versions from "my guy" > for cutting swirls in single-color vinyl. > > Do those s

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Possible Two Color Debian Logo White Vinyl Sticker Group Buy

Bdale Garbee writes: > Don Armstrong writes: > >> I think these are going to be closer to US$5-10 per for larger ones, but >> I'm interested in getting a few of them myself. > > I work with a US supplier of cut vinyl decals for the Altus Metrum logo, > I'l

Re: Possible Two Color Debian Logo White Vinyl Sticker Group Buy

Steve Langasek dijo [Tue, May 06, 2014 at 01:36:00PM -0700]: > What would really be nice would be if someone would make another run of the > shaped swirl vinyl stickers. I think I last saw these for sale back in > ~2006, and I've gone through enough hardware since then that my current > laptop is

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Possible Two Color Debian Logo White Vinyl Sticker Group Buy

Don Armstrong writes: > I think these are going to be closer to US$5-10 per for larger ones, but > I'm interested in getting a few of them myself. I work with a US supplier of cut vinyl decals for the Altus Metrum logo, I'll ask him for a quote on plain swirls in a size

Re: Possible Two Color Debian Logo White Vinyl Sticker Group Buy

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 02:18:40PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Tue, 06 May 2014, Steve Langasek wrote: > > What would really be nice would be if someone would make another run > > of the shaped swirl vinyl stickers. I think I last saw these for sale > > back in ~2006, and I've gone through eno

Re: Possible Two Color Debian Logo White Vinyl Sticker Group Buy

Hi, On Dienstag, 6. Mai 2014, Steve Langasek wrote: > What would really be nice would be if someone would make another run of the > shaped swirl vinyl stickers. I think I last saw these for sale back in > ~2006, and I've gone through enough hardware since then that my current > laptop is bare. :(

Re: Possible Two Color Debian Logo White Vinyl Sticker Group Buy

On Tue, 06 May 2014, Steve Langasek wrote: > What would really be nice would be if someone would make another run > of the shaped swirl vinyl stickers. I think I last saw these for sale > back in ~2006, and I've gone through enough hardware since then that > my current laptop is bare. :( Any chance

Re: Possible Two Color Debian Logo White Vinyl Sticker Group Buy

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 12:40:24PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > I'm considering coordinating a group buy of two color, 54mm x 70mm white > vinyl stickers with the Debian Open Logo[logo], and distributing them to > other group purchasers at Debconf14. > Minimum quantities of

Possible Two Color Debian Logo White Vinyl Sticker Group Buy

I'm considering coordinating a group buy of two color, 54mm x 70mm white vinyl stickers with the Debian Open Logo[logo], and distributing them to other group purchasers at Debconf14. Minimum quantities of 2000 (US$250) are required from the printer which I've found,[printer] which comes

Re: Answers to questions raised about registering the Debian Logo as our trademark

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Brian Gupta wrote: > 4) What is the impact of registering in the US only? > A: We would still only have Common law protection in those countries > we don't register the logo. We'd gain no benefit in those > jurisdictions, but it wouldn

Re: Answers to questions raised about registering the Debian Logo as our trademark

and potentially a blank cheque ($3347 > plus maintenance and costs of enforcement necessary to prevent it > becoming generic), but I'd prefer those who are based and trading > significantly with the debian logo in the US to make the decision. Not doing it would mean going against our le

Re: Answers to questions raised about registering the Debian Logo as our trademark

this seems like a waste of project money (are many > infringers in the US anyway?) and potentially a blank cheque ($3347 > plus maintenance and costs of enforcement necessary to prevent it > becoming generic), but I'd prefer those who are based and trading > significantly with the

Re: Answers to questions raised about registering the Debian Logo as our trademark

is the impact of registering in the US only? > A: We would still only have Common law protection in those countries > we don't register the logo. We'd gain no benefit in those > jurisdictions, but it wouldn't hurt us either. [...] Well, I've few US customers buying deb

Answers to questions raised about registering the Debian Logo as our trademark

I finally had a chance to discuss with our legal counsel, and have some answers to the questions raised in the discussion. The summary of the Q&A is (from list and some of my own): 1) Does registering logo require any changes to TM policy? A: No changes required 2) What are the cost

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

ian, as suggested by Lucas on debian-devel-announce, before Debian proceeds with formally registering its logo, I would like to ask again a clarification on the strategy for the registration. A simulation on http://www.wipo.int indicates that registering in all possible countries would cost 60,425

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

Hi Brian, On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:04:34PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: > I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late > February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a number of times. > Currently, our logo is not a registered Trademark, but is consider

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

* Brian Gupta [2013-04-22 16:04]: > What do people feel about proceeding with this registration? I'm strongly in favour. As pointed out in my other email, there's no conflict between having a DFSG-free logo and having a registered trademark. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

* Brian Gupta [2013-04-22 16:58]: > 1) Gnome foot is licensed under LGPL/GPL and is a registered > Trademark: (Pretty much all artwork including the foot is licensed > under Copyright law under LGPL/GPL). GNOME actually has a good example of why it makes sense to license your logo freel

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

MJ Ray phonecoop.coop> writes: > [registration] allows law > enforcement officers to prosecute what they consider infringement, > whether or not we do. This is one way that multinationals make > taxpayers pay for policing their brands - however, debian is not > locked down like LVMH or D&G. I'd

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

Le Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:04:34PM -0400, Brian Gupta a écrit : > > Cons: > - > - Filing costs of ~$700 > - Labor/work required to file (With assistance from SFLC, I am willing > to do much of the work required.) Dear Brian, I wonder how will be the cost of a registered trademark on the mid

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:04:34PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: > Generally speaking, as a matter of law, it would be better if we > registered our logo as our Trademark. We had also gotten advice from > our legal counsel (SFLC) encouraging us to do so. > > I don't believe

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

or logos in the > trademark database, they would be discouraged from using our logo, as > it is would be in the database. Do abusers of our trademark bother to search? Surely they'd be discouraged if they search the web? That's easier to search than the USPTO database. > - If

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

> >> >> >> I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late >> >> February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a number of times. >> >> >> >> Currently, our logo is not a registered Trademark, but is considered >>

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

M8/SIMIINJzCzY/s1600/nike_logo-400-400.jpg Remember we are not registering a generic swirl/spiral, but our particular take on the spiral/swirl, which we have been using the represent the Debian Project since 1999. I did do a search of EVERY registered graphic trademark with the metadata "

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

Debian since late > >> February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a number of times. > >> > >> Currently, our logo is not a registered Trademark, but is considered > >> (and treated by our current Trademark policy) as a "common law" > >>

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:04:34PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late >> February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a numbe

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

gt; Hi all, > >> I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late > >> February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a number of times. > >> Currently, our logo is not a registered Trademark, but is considered > >> (and treated by our curr

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

> >> I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late >> February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a number of times. > >> Currently, our logo is not a registered Trademark, but is considered >> (and treated by our current Trademark policy

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > Just to make sure: you are talking not about swirl alone, but rather > > about swirl + word Debian. Is that correct? > Both are now open-use. I was interested which logo was suggested to become a registered Trademark.

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:13:24PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Just to make sure: you are talking not about swirl alone, but rather > about swirl + word Debian. Is that correct? Both are now open-use. The only non-DFSG free logo would be the bottle logo, ISTR.

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

Hi Brian, Just to make sure: you are talking not about swirl alone, but rather about swirl + word Debian. Is that correct? On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Brian Gupta wrote: > Hi all, > I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late > February, and the issue of our Logo

Re: Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:04:34PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late > February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a number of times. > > Currently, our logo is not a registered Trademark, but is

Registering the Debian Logo as our trademark?

Hi all, I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a number of times. Currently, our logo is not a registered Trademark, but is considered (and treated by our current Trademark policy) as a "common law" tra

Re: Debian Logo from Tenerife

the Tea set clearly was just your generic spiral, while this expo in Puerto de la Cruz clearly is using our logo. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- Th

Debian Logo from Tenerife

Hey everyone, just saw the Debian tee can and wanted to share you this: http://www.puertodelacruz.com/noticias-de-puerto-de-la-cruz/llega-la-semana-expocomercial-a-puerto-de-la-cruz/201208161578.html ;-) Regards Markus -- Markus Frosch mar...@lazyfrosch.de http://www.lazyfrosch.de -- To UNSUB

Re: ditching the official use logo?

f keeping it seem reasonable in the abstract > > but, frankly, all a tad too "theoretical". As a matter of fact we do not > > use the restricted logo that much (if at all) in official documents: as > > DPL I've signed quite a few of them (letters, certificates, some >

Re: ditching the official use logo?

now if our > pattern of usage for it won't change *g*.) > > How about the attached patch? > > In hindsight, it doesn't change the logos, but just improve our > communications about them. It clarifies that our preferred logo is the > open use one, and call the other

Re: ditching the official use logo?

best kind of correct. > > I second this (I am on the camp of "we need/should keep the restricted > logo"). I consider this an acceptable compromise. I second the patch (I was in the camp of "put the bottle logo in a museum".) As Henrique wrote, the patch is an acc

Re: ditching the official use logo?

On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > How about the attached patch? > > Looks great to me. Calling it restricted is technically correct, and > well, that's the the best kind of correct. I second this (I am on the camp of "we need/should keep the restricted lo

Re: ditching the official use logo?

a Capello wrote: > > On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:52:18 +0200, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > > or other "official" documentes should carry the official logo, so > > > their reproduction and modification is not legal. > > I completely agree with such a point. > > Al

Re: ditching the official use logo?

Thanks to all participants on this thread thus far. On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:52:18 +0200, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > or other "official" documentes should carry the official logo, so > > their reproductio

Re: ditching the official use logo?

012 at 09:04:12AM -0400, David Prévot a écrit : >> > Le 01/10/2012 06:40, Bart Martens a écrit : >> > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:27:37PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> > >> Note for those who have never looked into this: the "official use" logo >

Re: ditching the official use logo?

This one time, at band camp, Charles Plessy said: > Hello everybody, > > I think it would be good to discontinue the "Debian Official Use Logo" if we > agree that it is causing more problems than it

Re: ditching the official use logo?

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 08:48:40PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Mon, October 8, 2012 16:52, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > Right now, the way I understand it is that you can, in a DFSG and legal > > way, create a document with the Debian logo & brand, and create a > >

Re: ditching the official use logo?

; way, create a document with the Debian logo & brand, and create a >> > "certificate" that looks to be from Debian, and sell them as some sort >> > of certification from Debian without recourse from the Debian project. >> >> This is possible whether the

Re: ditching the official use logo?

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 08:48:40PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Mon, October 8, 2012 16:52, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > Right now, the way I understand it is that you can, in a DFSG and legal > > way, create a document with the Debian logo & brand, and create a > >

Re: ditching the official use logo?

On Mon, October 8, 2012 16:52, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > Right now, the way I understand it is that you can, in a DFSG and legal > way, create a document with the Debian logo & brand, and create a > "certificate" that looks to be from Debian, and sell them as some sort

Re: ditching the official use logo?

Paul Tagliamonte writes ("Re: ditching the official use logo?"): > I know this is a borderline slimy argument, and I really (REALLY) don't > like being on the side of non-free, but I think continuing to assert > copyright / non-free conditions on the official use logo w

Re: ditching the official use logo?

or those who have never looked into this: the "official use" logo > > >> is the one with the bottle. > > > > > >> My personal take on it is that we should simply > > >> ditch it, focusing on a single logo (the "open use" one) wit

Re: ditching the official use logo?

Le Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:04:12AM -0400, David Prévot a écrit : > Le 01/10/2012 06:40, Bart Martens a écrit : > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:27:37PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > >> Note for those who have never looked into this: the "official use" logo >

The Debian Official Use Logo remains non-free

Despite a recent claim to the contrary which reached this forum, there is still one logo which is non-free. The Debian Official Use Logo is still only distributed under a restrictive and confusing license. The information on the website is still up-to-date: http://www.debian.org/logos

Re: ditching the official use logo?

On Tue, 02 Oct 2012, David Prévot wrote: > > I don't object against ditching the logo with the bottle. I don't object > > against keeping it around either. Maybe if people want to keep it around > > for > > nostalgic reasons it can be kept available on the w

Re: ditching the official use logo?

ano Zacchiroli wrote: >> Note for those who have never looked into this: the "official use" logo >> is the one with the bottle. > >> My personal take on it is that we should simply >> ditch it, focusing on a single logo (the "open use" one) with a

Re: ditching the official use logo?

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:10:44PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > I agree with the idea of discontinuing the 'official use' logo (remove it > from the logo page and/or moving it to the 'other promotional images' > section), but not before relicensing it to the same

Re: ditching the official use logo?

On Mon, October 1, 2012 12:27, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I haven't touched (nor looked into) the official logo. My impression is > that that that logo is massively underused and basically unknown to most > of our public out there. My personal take on it is that we should sim

Re: ditching the official use logo?

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:27:37PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Note for those who have never looked into this: the "official use" logo > is the one with the bottle. ... > My personal take on it is that we should simply > ditch it, focusing on a single logo (the "o

ditching the official use logo?

Note for those who have never looked into this: the "official use" logo is the one with the bottle. Its license is non-free, fairly restrictive, and only allows usage after some official vetting by Debian, in various forms. On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:14:04PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wro

Re: DFSG-free relicensing of the Debian logo(s) - DONE

* Stefano Zacchiroli [121001 10:39]: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:36:04PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > If you're working on Debian artworks or the like, feel free to start > > using the official logo in them. Assuming that it will be DFSG-free RSN > > is now a

DFSG-free relicensing of the Debian logo(s) - DONE

t > using the official logo in them. Assuming that it will be DFSG-free RSN > is now a safe bet. You should just avoid claiming that it is *already* > free until my final announcement here (after September 13th). For the -desktop people, I've reviewed the content of the desktop-bas

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo?

On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:42:14 +0200 Rox 64 wrote: > So what are the supposed weakness of both versions of the GPL? There's extended literature about the weaknesses of the GNU GPL v2 (patent pacts, tivoization, ...), so I won't elaborate on them here. The FSF web site is the primary source of pro-u

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo?

So what are the supposed weakness of both versions of the GPL?

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo?

On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 07:44:55 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:34:52PM +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit : > > > > In the meanwhile, what I was proposing was that the licensing of the > > Debian Open Use Logo should not create a deliberate incompatibilit

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo?

Le Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:34:52PM +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit : > > In the meanwhile, what I was proposing was that the licensing of the > Debian Open Use Logo should not create a deliberate incompatibility > with either the GPLv2 or the GPLv3. Hi Francesco, The Debian Open Use

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo?

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:00:08 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:31:55PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > There are two issues with your previous reply: > > > > * it was not clear that your request for more info also included > > questions about the particular copyright

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo?

sion"). All these problems will be fixed, when (and if) the FSF releases a new version of the GNU GPL (v4? v5? ...) able to cure the weaknesses (and the other minor flaws) of the GNU GPL v3, without introducing new flaws (the FSF also has to stop promoting the GFDL, the AfferoGPL, ...). In t

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo?

as a SPI board resolution last week: http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/2012/2012-09-07.rtb.1/ I haven't yet done a proper announcement, simply because I yet have to prepare the patch to update the logo license page on the Debian website. If you feel strongly about this (as you clea

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo?

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:31:55PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > For reasons I won't elaborate on here (they would drive us far away > from the topic under discussion), I consider the GNU GPL v3 as a > license with a broken copyleft mechanism (at least for some aspects). > > Hence, whenever I wan

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo?

On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:17:53 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 09:31:41PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > I am following up to your August bits from the DPL, since I still have > > to understand why it was suggested to dual license the Open Use Logo &

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? [was: Re: bits from the DPL: August 2012]

On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 09:31:41PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > I am following up to your August bits from the DPL, since I still have > to understand why it was suggested to dual license the Open Use Logo > "with Debian" under LGPLv3+ / CC-by-sa-v3.0. > > I have

Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? [was: Re: bits from the DPL: August 2012]

On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 22:55:33 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: [...] > - The DFGS-free logo relicensing I've mentioned last month is now on its > way. Following advice from SFLC, I've slightly patched the current > trademark policy (mainly to clarify scope), just enough t

Re: Zgoda na wykorzystanie logo Debian

Hello, On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:07:11PM +, lolsz...@gmail.com wrote: > Is a company dedicated to such implementations of server solutions > based on Linux systems (SLES, Debian), I have to get someone's > permission to use the Debian logo on my Web site? You wan

Zgoda na wykorzystanie logo Debian

Witam. Czy jako firma zajmująca się m.in. wdrożeniami rozwiązań serwerowych opartych na systemach Linuxowych (SLES, Debian), muszę uzyskać czyjąś zgodę na wykorzystanie logo Debiana na swojej witrynie www? - Hi, Is a company dedicated to such implementations of server solutions

DebConf13 Logo Contest

Hi there! Please reply to the DebConf13-localteam@ mailing list, R-T and M-F-T set accordingly. The DebConf13 organizers are in the process of creating the logo for the next-year DebConf and we encourage everyone to participate. Some ideas are already present on the DebConf wiki [DC13-logo

Re: illegal logo

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:39:45PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > It's not a Debian logo. Not even close. I wouldn't go as far as "not even close" but they are a little bit different. Besides the colour change the swirl is, yes a swirl, but the tail ends in different places

Re: illegal logo

On 19.04.2012 19:39, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > It's not a Debian logo. Not even close. > It actually looks the same. > To avoid further confusion, maybe it'd be a good idea to change our logo > to something less silly. > I like debian logo now. signature.asc

Re: illegal logo

more ironically, AFAIK the majority of the people associate with Debian the open use logo, not the "official use" logo. Well may be because noone can really use the "official logo" FREELY even for Debian-related products. Even debian.org uses open use logo ;-) NB I actually

Re: illegal logo

* vangelis mouhtsis , 2012-04-19, 18:06: hi, someone reported in #debian that an institude uses, http://www.lightclinics.no/ debian's logo and i think thats illegal. It's not a Debian logo. Not even close. To avoid further confusion, maybe it'd be a good idea to change our log

illegal logo

hi, someone reported in #debian that an institude uses, http://www.lightclinics.no/ debian's logo and i think thats illegal. --

Re: Logo violation

On Thu, September 29, 2011 21:16, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Alain Belkadi] >> Maybe not the right place to send this info but someone is using the >> Debian Logo on a film festival website. > > Thanks for the report. As already noted, that logo is "open-use"

Re: Logo violation

[Alain Belkadi] > Maybe not the right place to send this info but someone is using the > Debian Logo on a film festival website. Thanks for the report. As already noted, that logo is "open-use", you can use it for pretty much anything. Beyond that, it is an unfortunate fact th

Re: Logo violation

could be used for any commercial product as long as the word Debian (trademarked) doesn't appear. On Thu, 29 Sep 2011, Alain Belkadi wrote: > Maybe not the right place to send this info but someone is using the > Debian Logo on a film festival website. > There is no relation at all

Re: question about Debian Logo with Debian

IANAL but in short * you can use "Debian Open Use Logo" (swirl) but not "Debian Official Use Logo License" (bottle) * you are not creating a software-related product, so use of "Debian" word in your banner would not infringe the Debian trademark On Mon, 18

Re: question about Debian Logo with Debian

based on Debian. Sometimes help my co-worker to maintain http://debian.mirror.vu.lt Question: I wanted to print some stickers on my car and one of them would be Debian Logo with words: "I use *Debian logo* where i can, where i can't I use *Linux logo*" Some Researches: I have searched

question about Debian Logo with Debian

://debian.mirror.vu.lt Question: I wanted to print some stickers on my car and one of them would be Debian Logo with words: "I use *Debian logo* where i can, where i can't I use *Linux logo*" Some Researches: I have searched your web: http://www.debian.org/trademark http://www.d

Re: Logo rights

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:34:08PM +0200, pavroo wrote: > I am writing to you becouse I am running a web site for Linux > beginners http://linuxiarze.pl and I want to make sure about your > logo's licence. There are two (or three depending how you see it) varieties of the Debian log

Logo rights

Hi. I am writing to you becouse I am running a web site for Linux beginners http://linuxiarze.pl and I want to make sure about your logo's licence. I'd like to offer my readers some gadgets with the popular dist's logo (like yours) as a free gift (to help advertize your project t

Registration of Debian Logo unrelated to Debian

Hi, On Friday 25 March 2011 14.43:32 [-R.I.P.-] - Макс wrote: > Hello! You logo use without link! > http://tm.patent.su/40-400999/tm/servl/servlete1dc.html loock this. > it's pattent! Thank you for notifying us. I don't speak russian well, so I hope somebody else can

Re: About logo copyright in http://www.jveloso.cl/?

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:53:37AM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote: > [ I fixed OP's grammar issues to make this thread more clear] > > On Saturday 12 March 2011 21:38:52 Kanibal v wrote: > > I just saw this site http://www.jveloso.cl/ that is using Debian logo here > >

Re: About logo copyright in http://www.jveloso.cl/?

[ I fixed OP's grammar issues to make this thread more clear] On Saturday 12 March 2011 21:38:52 Kanibal v wrote: > I just saw this site http://www.jveloso.cl/ that is using Debian logo here > in Chile, I would like to ask you if this enterprise is [allowed] to use the > logo

  1   2   3   >