Hi. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on "Fri, 4 Aug 2000 22:29:12 +0200", with "Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)", "Oliver M . Bolzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 02:03:37PM -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote... > > When I submitted a scan of my Driver's License in early 1998, I used xpaint > > or the gimp or something to place black "censorship" rectangles over my > > actual driver's license number and social security number. This was > > regarded as acceptable at the time. > > > > Would it still be? I am nervous about Dale's desire to get a photo of > > every Debian developer, at least all the ones joining under the new > > process, but compelling people to submit uncropped, unedited scans of > > documentation like this really opens us up to charges of privacy invasion. > > It seems to be still aceptable. I sent a scan of my passport to my AM > few days ago with Signature and Passport numer blacked out. Not that I > wouldn't trust Debian with this info, I just dont't want my signature > to be digitized to be at all. > Maybe the NM page should clearly state that signatures and so can and and > should be blacked out. And furthermore, from what I have heared, even the > attempt to scan official documents like driver's licences or passports > is illigal in Germany, just like scanning money. Maybe other countries have > similar laws. I have committed in cvs to add some note on photo-ID into nm-step2 page. If you have some proposal to improve that text, then please let me know. Thanks. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>