martin f krafft wrote:
> > > 3. In § 10 Abs. 8 it is stated that the minutes of the members'
> > >meetings are to be made publicly available. Yet, the last set of
> > >minutes linked online² is from 2006. § 10 Abs. 2 states that such
> > >a meeting must take place once every two years.
Dear Joey,
thanks for your replies!
> ffis e.V. supports Free Software in general, a small number of
> Free Software projects in particular, and maintains close
> relationship to the projects they are supporting, be it via an
> auditor, project leader or via a contact person within the
> project.
martin f krafft wrote:
> I have one question about Joey's responses regarding FFIS:
>
> > > * The organization has decision-making processes that explicitely
> > >delegate decisions on Debian assets to the Debian Project Leader
> >
> > true.
>
> For completeness: where is this "explicitly"
also sprach Lucas Nussbaum [2014-03-11 11:58 +0100]:
> I'm forwarding their answers below; please use the next two weeks
> to ask follow-up questions.
*Almost* in time, at least if 2 == 4, and clearly, there are cases
when that is true. ;)
I have one question about Joey's responses regarding FF
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi Joey,
>
> On 11/03/14 at 11:58 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > == The organization should be reliable, sustainable, and reactive ==
> > > * The organization has several people sharing the role of treasurer in
> > >order to react quickly to requests in all circums
Hi Joey,
On 11/03/14 at 11:58 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > == The organization should be reliable, sustainable, and reactive ==
> > * The organization has several people sharing the role of treasurer in
> >order to react quickly to requests in all circumstances
>
> true.
I was actually
..@ffis.de, audi...@debian.org
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 16:16:09 +0100
Subject: Re: Evaluation criteria for (prospective) Trusted Organizations -- FFIS
Message-ID: <20140308151609.gx...@finlandia.home.infodrom.org>
> Debian Trusted Organizations (TO) are organizations that hold and manage
&
On 02/03/14 at 13:22 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > While I don't think there's any question that FFIS should be one of Debian's
> > TOs, I think having the answers to these questions is important in order to
> > protect both parties, so that
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> While I don't think there's any question that FFIS should be one of Debian's
> TOs, I think having the answers to these questions is important in order to
> protect both parties, so that there's some record of what the expected
> relationship
Hi Lucas,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 05:41:08PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> There are three organizations that never went through that process,
> and that either we use as if they were already TOs, or they would like
> to officially become a TO: FFIS, Debian.ch, and Debian France.
> As previously
Hi,
Our constitution (5.1.11 and 9) describes a process to manage the list
of Trusted Organizations:
(5.1.11)
The Project Leader may:
Add or remove organizations from the list of trusted
organizations (see §9.3) that are authorized to accept and hold
assets for Debian
11 matches
Mail list logo
