Re: Question regarding to the status of Debian 11 (bullseye) AMIs

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:41:57PM +, yu, bing wrote: > Hi Debian Team, > > This is Bing Yu, a software engineer from NetApp. I am working on a project > using Debian 11 and I realised our official Debian 11 (bullseye) AMIs for > Amazon EC2 hasn’t been updated since Oct 2023 > https://wiki.

Re: Question about contributing to debian financially.

On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 08:35 -0500, Zeke Williams wrote: > I have an additional question for if I were to hire someone personally > to maintain certain debian packages. What happens with the security > team if a package has no maintainer and a security vulnerability is > found? Does the security te

Re: Question about contributing to debian financially.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 08:35:01AM -0500, Zeke Williams wrote: I have an additional question for if I were to hire someone personally to maintain certain debian packages. What happens with the security team if a package has no maintainer and a security vulnerability is found? Does the security te

Re: Question about contributing to debian financially.

I have an additional question for if I were to hire someone personally to maintain certain debian packages. What happens with the security team if a package has no maintainer and a security vulnerability is found? Does the security team recompile the package with the patch even if there is no maint

Re: Question about contributing to debian financially.

On Tue, 2022-11-15 at 12:22 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Debian is defined –and proud– to be a volunteer-based project, > that is, we don't hire and have never hired people to do our work, > technical or otherwise. The only exception thus far has been Outreachy internships. > If you donate funds

Re: Question about contributing to debian financially.

Hello Zeke, Zeke Williams dijo [Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 08:36:15AM -0500]: > I'm considering in the future, funding the debian project financially. > More specifically, helping fund hiring package maintainers for > orphaned packages as well as individuals who can maintain the security > patches. How

Re: question with the Debian Project

On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 17:13 +0800, 桑猛 wrote: >  Hello debian,I am a user of debian system and belong to the company > Loongson Zhongke. We have our own loongarch architecture. Please check out our documentation on how to create new Debian ports, it has the steps you will need to get LoongArch sup

Re: question with the Debian Project

Am 29.07.2022 um 12:09 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin: On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 05:13:38PM +0800, 桑猛 wrote: Hello debian,I am a user of debian system and belong to the company Loongson Zhongke. We have our own loongarch architecture. Now we want to adapt our loongarch architecture based on debian

Re: question with the Debian Project

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 05:13:38PM +0800, 桑猛 wrote: > Hello debian,I am a user of debian system and belong to the company Loongson > Zhongke. We have our own loongarch architecture. Now we want to adapt our > loongarch architecture based on debian12 or debian13. > > We would like to get the vers

Re: question with the Debian Project

On 29/07/2022 11:13, 桑猛 wrote: Hello debian,I am a user of debian system and belong to the company Loongson Zhongke. We have our own loongarch architecture. Now we want to adapt our loongarch architecture based on debian12 or debian13. We would like to get the *version of some packages* on deb

Re: Question regarding wallpapers

Hi F.X. Patterson Would this happen to be what you're looking for? https://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/Themes Thank you *--Sergio Moraes* *Data Management Analyst* Phone: (734) 262-9830 On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:46 PM F.X. Patterson wrote: > Hello, > > I wasn't sure where else to email this to

Re: Question

Hi Nyle On 2021/02/04 09:00, Nyle Davis wrote: > Sirs; Debian contributors are made up of a large variety of people and we try to use inclusive language as far as possible. > I was using Kubuntu 14.04 LTS which had what I called "Super Windows" > where any window could be nested within any other

Re: question - contact to web dev of debian website

Hi George, You can reach the web team on their mailing list at debian-...@lists.debian.org or on IRC on the #debian-www channel, on OFTC. If you want to have a look at the current code for debian.org, it's hosted here [1]. Cheers, [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶

Re: question - contact to web dev of debian website

On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 13:55 +, George Suba wrote: > Dear all, > > I did read somewhere on net about new site and since then (today) I > visited the debian.org site. I think I can help with it or at least I > could provide some valuable directions. > > ( I use bash, responsive frameworks lik

Re: Question about repositories

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:29 PM negin jafari wrote: > I am a university Student trying to learn a lot of things about Debian. As a university student, you might be interested in participating in Debian through the Google Summer of Code or Outreachy paid mentorship programs. https://www.outreachy

Re: Question about repositories

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 04:52:34PM +0330, negin jafari wrote: > Dear sir or madam, > > I am a university Student trying to learn a lot of things about Debian. > I searched all the website about list of repositories but I could only find > the link below : > http://ftp.acc.umu.se/debian/

Re: Question about repositories

Le 23/10/2020 à 15:22, negin jafari a écrit : > Dear sir or madam, > > I am a university Student trying to learn a lot of things about Debian. > I searched all the website about list of repositories but I could only > find the link below : > http://ftp.acc.umu.se/debian/ > Is there only one reposi

Re: Question to all: Outreach

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 07:01:35PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 5:26 PM Daniel Lange wrote: > [...] > > As Debian can afford paying for its interns itself, we do. > This looks bad to me. Should Debian pay directly to its contributors? Indeed this is a good question, whic

Re: Question to all: Outreach

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 8:12 PM Ulrike Uhlig wrote: > > Hello! > > On 18.03.20 12:01, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 5:26 PM Daniel Lange wrote: > > [...] > >> As Debian can afford paying for its interns itself, we do. > > > > This looks bad to me. Should Debian pay directly to

Re: Question to all: Outreach

Hello! On 18.03.20 12:01, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 5:26 PM Daniel Lange wrote: > [...] >> As Debian can afford paying for its interns itself, we do. > > This looks bad to me. Should Debian pay directly to its contributors? > PS, IMO it's totally fine that other parties to p

Re: Question to all: Outreach

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 5:26 PM Daniel Lange wrote: [...] > As Debian can afford paying for its interns itself, we do. This looks bad to me. Should Debian pay directly to its contributors? PS, IMO it's totally fine that other parties to pay Debian contributors, like the LTS program. -- Shengjin

Re: Question to all: Outreach

Hi 朱晟菁, Am 18.03.20 um 09:43 schrieb Shengjing Zhu: It's still not clear to me the difference between GSoC and Outreachy program. GSoC is a Google program: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/ Outreachy is a SFC program (originally founded at GNOME): https://www.outreachy.org Both are unre

Re: Question to all: Outreach

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 5:17 AM Hector Oron wrote: [...] > > There are many people in Debian who were GSoC students and are active > > Debian contributors, DMs, DDs. In which way does Outreachy differ from > > GSoC from a Debian point of view - besides the fact that it explicitly > > encourages pe

Re: Question to all: Outreach

[Moving to debian-project from debian-vote if your intend is to discuss on the topic] Missatge de Ulrike Uhlig del dia dt., 17 de març 2020 a les 21:46: > (I have no idea if I am allowed to reply to this, or if only DPL > candidates are supposed to reply. Hence forgive me if I'm overstepping a >

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

* Sam Hartman: " Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog" (Sat, 25 May 2019 18:37:11 -0400): > >>>>> "Mathias" == Mathias Behrle writes: > > Mathias> * Karsten Merker: " Re: Question f

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

> "Norbert" == Norbert Preining writes: Norbert> Hi Sam, surprising statements from you ... Norbert> On Wed, 22 May 2019, Sam Hartman wrote: >> The same is true of package maintainership though. We sometimes >> do change the maintainership because we're unhappy with how

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

>>>>> "Mathias" == Mathias Behrle writes: Mathias> * Karsten Merker: " Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Mathias> Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog" (Sat, 25 Mathias> May 2019 17:49:13 +0200): Mathias> Hi togethe

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

Hi Sam, surprising statements from you ... On Wed, 22 May 2019, Sam Hartman wrote: > The same is true of package maintainership though. We sometimes do > change the maintainership because we're unhappy with how someone > maintains their packages. That rarely uses the formal policy that goes ??

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

On May 25, 2019 9:16:09 PM UTC, Holger Levsen wrote: >On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 05:49:13PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote: >> b) The only case where I would consider a forced removal of >>somebody else's feed by somebody who is not part of planet >>admin to be justified would be if the furth

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 05:49:13PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote: > b) The only case where I would consider a forced removal of >somebody else's feed by somebody who is not part of planet >admin to be justified would be if the further inclusion of the >feed on planet would constitute a cr

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

* Karsten Merker: " Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog" (Sat, 25 May 2019 17:49:13 +0200): Hi together, I am supporting wholeheartedly the view of Carsten with some small amendments. > a) As the general rule DDs who are not p

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 18:27 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > If you make a bad upload, someone will be quick to point out to you > exactly which part of debian policy you've messed up and file an RC bug > against your package. Our community guidelines deserve to be on the same > standard, if a blog

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

Hi Phil, Le Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:37:07PM +0200, Philip Hands a écrit : > > I see no reason to assume the worst. Maybe growth and the law of big numbers ? The more we are the more it is likely to happen. As somebody who had my work reverted temporarly by somebody who acted alone (although mo

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

> "Norbert" == Norbert Preining writes: Norbert> On Tue, 21 May 2019, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> I think it's more open and equally clean for someone who's blog >> has been non- consensually removed to be able to put it back >> themselves immediately (if they think the removal

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

> "Benj" == Benj Mako Hill writes: Benj> I'd be happy to document this on the Planet wiki page. I agree with Joerg that I don't think we need a lot of new rules here. I'll point out that the situation I asked about has never happened (although one close to it in some ways did), and it f

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

Scott Kitterman writes: ... > I think defaulting to silencing people is the opposite of openness. It does not strike me as defaulting to silencing people, to allow the people we all effectively trust with root on all of our systems (DDs) to exercise their judgement, and very occasionally apply it

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

On Tue, 21 May 2019, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I think it's more open and equally clean for someone who's blog has been non- > consensually removed to be able to put it back themselves immediately (if > they > think the removal was unreasonable) and point the remover at the Planet > Debian > adm

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

On Tuesday, May 21, 2019 7:41:51 PM EDT Benj. Mako Hill wrote: > Greetings! > > I'm a planet admin although, as you suggest, I think this is outside > of the area of documented policy. > > > > > Imagine that I get a note from a random developer saying they have > > removed my blog from planet.

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

Greetings! I'm a planet admin although, as you suggest, I think this is outside of the area of documented policy. > Imagine that I get a note from a random developer saying they have > removed my blog from planet. I understand what they are saying enough > to believe it is not vandalism; they h

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

On 15409 March 1977, Sam Hartman wrote: Imagine that I get a note from a random developer saying they have removed my blog from planet. I understand what they are saying enough to believe it is not vandalism; they honestly believe I did something wrong. I can't understand from their message ho

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Carter writes: >> 2) Ask the planet admins to respond to the situation and either >> help me understand the problem or add my blog back. Jonathan> Option number two seems like the entirely logical and Jonathan> reasonable approach. If it seems that yo

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

Hi Sam On 2019/05/21 12:15, Sam Hartman wrote: > Obviously this question is motivated by things that happened last year, > but I'm not asking about that situation, and the details of the question > I'm asking are intentionally different in ways that matter at least to > me. It's kind of hard to i

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: Ian> Sam Hartman writes ("Question for Planet Admins: What Should I Ian> do if another Developer Removes my Blog"): >> Imagine that I get a note from a random developer saying they >> have removed my blog from planet. I understand what they are

Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog

Sam Hartman writes ("Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog"): > Imagine that I get a note from a random developer saying they have > removed my blog from planet. I understand what they are saying enough > to believe it is not vandalism; they honestly be

Re: Question about wifi web service with debian

Hello William, and welcome El 12/02/17 a las 04:34, Billy O escribió: > hello my name is William O'Brien > > I have been using and researching debian for alittle while now and > have been trying to access wifi I have tried several different ways > and researched many tutorials and help sections w

Re: Question: (Important)

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Lori . wrote: > I've been having some problematic issues with the install of Debian 8. Please contact the user support channels for help: https://www.debian.org/support -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Question

Hello, على الجمعـة 29 تـمـوز 2016 ‫22:31، كتب Paul Wise: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 4:37 AM, ilpwh5p7h wrote: > >> I am writting to ask you if Debian could have in the next release (Debian 9) >> or better before in Debian 8 these 2 programs, presents in Ubuntu Linux: > > If you would like to pac

Re: Question

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 4:37 AM, ilpwh5p7h wrote: > I am writting to ask you if Debian could have in the next release (Debian 9) > or better before in Debian 8 these 2 programs, presents in Ubuntu Linux: If you would like to package those two programs for Debian, take a look here: https://mento

Re: question precise

Hi, Le 24-05-2016, à 15:24:22 +, Jean Christophe André a écrit : Hi all, Le ven. 20 mai 2016 à 11:09, <[1]humbert.olivie...@free.fr> a écrit : Petite note : debian et ubuntu ne sont pas la même chose bien qu'ubuntu soit basée sur debian. Si tu cherches de l'aide à propos d

Re: question precise

Hi all, Le ven. 20 mai 2016 à 11:09, a écrit : > Petite note : debian et ubuntu ne sont pas la même chose bien qu'ubuntu > soit basée sur debian. > Si tu cherches de l'aide à propos d'ubuntu, alors le site > http://ubuntu-fr.org sera plus pertinent > pour toi. > I think he arrived asking here b

Re: question precise

Hi all, Following in french for Sergio who is asking about Debian in french. Salut Sergio, il y a une liste debian-user-fre...@lists.debian.org à laquelle tu peux t'abonner pour parler de debian en français. Petite note : debian et ubuntu ne sont pas la même chose bien qu'ubuntu soit basée sur

Re : question precise

Bonjour, - Sartorelli Sergio a écrit : > Bonjour. J'aimerai savoir si il existe Debian complètement en français ? Le français est l'une des langues la mieux supportées chez Debian avec l'anglais, avec un taux de traduction proche de 100 % (voire de 100 %). Donc oui, Debian peut être cons

Re: Question

On Thu, 25 Dec 2014, ali reza wrote: >Greetings >Debian on the Intel 64-bit install? yeah >Which version should I download the 64-bitA got ia or amd? amd64 architecture. IIRC ia is for itanium (rare beast, pre-x86_64 instruction set 64bit proprietary architecture from intel -- n

Re: Question on About Page

Raymond gmail.com> writes: > focuses on the freedom of the users, while the definition of the > open source movement uses the word "free" only in the context of > money, but never in the context of freedom for the user. The Ehm, you’re looking too narrowly. Do not restrict reading th

Re: Question on About Page

On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > In February 1998 a group moved to replace the term "Free Software" > with "Open Source Software". This terminology debate reflects > underlying philosophical differences, but the practical requirements > placed on software lice

Re: Question on About Page

Hi Russ, Thank you for your response. I think I understand your concern about flame wars; and I'm definitely not looking for one. I understand it can be difficult to represent someone else's position in a single sentence, but I think the effort to be accurate is not in vain. For the more political

Re: Question on About Page

Raymond writes: > I noticed the following statement in the introduction of your about > page: > "In February 1998 a group moved to replace the term "Free Software > " with "Open Source Software > ". Th

Re: Question about GNOME Trademark and GNOME project packages in Debian

Steve Langasek dixit: >DFSG #8 is not an issue. DFSG #4 allows authors to require changed versions >of their software to be distributed under a different name. If the upstream >makes special allowances for Debian to use the name for modified versions, >this doesn't fail the DFSG, because everyon

Re: Question about GNOME Trademark and GNOME project packages in Debian

On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 11:07 -0400, Mike O'Connor wrote: > When we are contacted by a owner of a trademark on which we believe we > are infringing, the safest thing for us to do legally is to cease all > use of the mark. The easiest thing for us to do is to ignore their > claim. We'll need to figu

Re: Question about gadgets

W dniu 26.07.2011 22:37, Szymon Noczyński pisze: > My name is Szymon and I collect gadgets of different companies, > cities and institutions. We drew me, because it is nice to see a > package with some cool stuff. This has become my passion. My > collection is large, but do not give up and cont

Re: question about Debian Logo with Debian

IANAL but in short * you can use "Debian Open Use Logo" (swirl) but not "Debian Official Use Logo License" (bottle) * you are not creating a software-related product, so use of "Debian" word in your banner would not infringe the Debian trademark On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrot

Re: question about Debian Logo with Debian

any ideas? On 02/07/11 00:45, Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrote: Hello, how are you? About me: I am using Debian at work (workstation), home (laptop), home (mldonkey and torrentflux and samba server), and some hosting and multimedia desktop servers. writing my own Linux blog, where most manuals are bas

Re: Question about GNOME Trademark and GNOME project packages in Debian

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:26:02PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > We feel that it is infeasible for Debian to be in complete compliance > with the current GNOME trademark license. In our strict reading of this > license, the only way to be in full compliance would require us to > perform actions su

Re: Question about GNOME Trademark and GNOME project packages in Debian

Mike O'Connor writes: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:01:13 +0100 (BST), MJ Ray wrote: >> OK, sorry if this is an old chestnut, but do we actually need a licence >> in general? Is most of the use in Debian more than honest description >> of the source of the software? > As far as I know, we have not

Re: Question about GNOME Trademark and GNOME project packages in Debian

On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:01:13 +0100 (BST), MJ Ray wrote: > Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > We feel that it is infeasible for Debian to be in complete compliance > > with the current GNOME trademark license. [...] > > OK, sorry if this is an old chestnut, but do we actually need a > licence in general? I

Re: Question about GNOME Trademark and GNOME project packages in Debian

Joerg Jaspert wrote: > We feel that it is infeasible for Debian to be in complete compliance > with the current GNOME trademark license. [...] OK, sorry if this is an old chestnut, but do we actually need a licence in general? Is most of the use in Debian more than honest description of the sourc

Re: Question about GNOME Trademark and GNOME project packages in Debian

Hello world, [ We got asked how the Debian project (and especially us as delegates handling the archive) has handled trademarks in the past, and our opinion on how restrictive Trademark licenses can (or not) lead to DFSG freeness issues. This topic cooked up with the special example of the curren

Re: Question regarding Debian and CGL 5.0

On 2011-04-28, Russ Allbery wrote: > "Alex (karl exceed) Decker" writes: >> Just out of curiosity, I noticed that Debian has not been registered as >> CGL compliant since the 2.0 standard. Is there any plan on working >> toward CGL 5.0 compliance? >> I understand that it's a bit above and beyond

Re: Question regarding Debian and CGL 5.0

"Alex (karl exceed) Decker" writes: > Just out of curiosity, I noticed that Debian has not been registered as > CGL compliant since the 2.0 standard. Is there any plan on working > toward CGL 5.0 compliance? > I understand that it's a bit above and beyond normal usage, but a proven > 5-nine upti

Re: Question au sujet des droits de devloppement basé sur debian

mokhtar_one kirjoitti: Bonjours ! Je voudrai savoir quelle sont vos droits au sujet d'un développement d'une nouvelle distribution Linux basé sur debian . Merci Avez vous deja trouve cet texte?: http://www.debian.org/social_contract.fr.html -- Tapio Lehtonen pj. Linux-Aktivaattori http://l-

Re: Re; Question

hattori kirjoitti: Dear Sir. How do you do? My name is Jun Hattori. I want to backup web application (I know URL only). Can your product do it ? Please reply. Your cooperation woud be appreciated. Best Regards, Jun Hattori This mailing list is for "Discussion about non-technical topics rela

Re; Question

Dear Sir. How do you do? My name is Jun Hattori. I want to backup web application (I know URL only). Can your product do it ? Please reply. Your cooperation woud be appreciated. Best Regards, Jun Hattori -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Re: Question to all Candidates: we want more, aren't we?

Hello, [switching to debian-project] On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:57 +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > > Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more > package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool). > > How do we face the challenge to do more every year? This fir

Re: Question in respect to GNU/Lnux affiliation

On Sun, Mar 14 2010, Russ Allbery wrote: > The Hickeys writes: > >> How come the GNU/Linux site does not have Debian on its free >> distribution list, and makes no mention of Debian at all it seems? Is >> this because Debian does not adhere to the GNU/Linux "Free Software >> Definition"? > > Ther

Re: Question in respect to GNU/Lnux affiliation

The Hickeys dijo [Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:20:05PM -0300]: > How come the GNU/Linux site does not have Debian on its free > distribution list, and makes no mention of Debian at all it seems? Is > this because Debian does not adhere to the GNU/Linux "Free Software > Definition"? The reasons my

Re: Question in respect to GNU/Lnux affiliation

On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 3:20 PM, The Hickeys wrote: > > How come the GNU/Linux site does not have Debian on its free distribution > list, and makes no mention of Debian at all it seems? Is this because Debian > does not adhere to the GNU/Linux "Free Software Definition"? > > Thanks, > Greg H. H

Re: Question in respect to GNU/Lnux affiliation

The Hickeys writes: > How come the GNU/Linux site does not have Debian on its free > distribution list, and makes no mention of Debian at all it seems? Is > this because Debian does not adhere to the GNU/Linux "Free Software > Definition"? There have been a variety of different reasons over the

Re: Question in respect to GNU/Lnux affiliation

On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 03:59:53PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 12:20 -0300, The Hickeys wrote: > > How come the GNU/Linux site does not have Debian on its free > > distribution list, and makes no mention of Debian at all it seems? Is > > this because Debian does not adhere

Re: Question in respect to GNU/Lnux affiliation

On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 12:20 -0300, The Hickeys wrote: > How come the GNU/Linux site does not have Debian on its free > distribution list, and makes no mention of Debian at all it seems? Is > this because Debian does not adhere to the GNU/Linux "Free Software > Definition"? Probably because of t

Re: Question on removing something from google search

On Fri, 25 Dec 2009, Dustin Romero wrote: > http://lists.debian.org/cdwrite/2007/01/msg00056.html > > This is the first page that comes up when you search my name. I'm in a > position where I don't particularly want that to be attributed to me. I have > no idea where this came from and the Dustin

Re: Question on removing something from google search

It only appears at the end of the second page of results for me. Beware of quoting the url directly, you just increased its pagerank... I don't know if listmaster will remove it but even if it does, it won't remove it from the dozen mailling list mirrors out there. As usual, the right way to make b

Re: Question about the amount of security updates available

: "Frans Pop" To: debian-project@lists.debian.org Cc: "Thomas Nguyen Van" Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 3:43:23 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: Question about the amount of security updates available On Monday 16 February 2009, Thomas Nguyen V

Re: Question about the amount of security updates available

On Monday 16 February 2009, Thomas Nguyen Van wrote: > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free ^^ That was exactly the problem. Your modified version looks correct. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ.

Re: Question about the amount of security updates available

5041 - Original Message - From: "Frans Pop" To: debian-project@lists.debian.org Cc: "Thomas Nguyen Van" Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 1:29:59 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: Question about the amount of security updates available On Mon

Re: Question about the amount of security updates available

On Monday 16 February 2009, Thomas Nguyen Van wrote: > In our company, we hourly check security updates via the command > "apt-get update" for several months. You may have noticed that Lenny was released this weekend. It seems to me that your /etc/apt/sources.list is probably not set up correctly

Re: Question about the amount of security updates available

Hello, Thomas. We released a new version of Debian stable yesterday, which means that the "stable" name in our repositories (including security repositories) now point to this new version (which is named Lenny). You probably have references to "stable" in your /etc/apt/sources.list file. It is hi

Re: Question about the amount of security updates available

On lun, 2009-02-16 at 12:02 +, Thomas Nguyen Van wrote: > My questions are: > 1. Do you confirm the amount of new security updates? If yes, what is the > link? > 2. Did you change the public key available for security updates? http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20090214 -- Yves-Alexis -- To

Re: Question to donation from OnlineStore to Debian/SPI

Le mardi 02 septembre 2008 à 15:45 +0200, Michelle Konzack a écrit : > Hello, > > I am ongoing to start a new OnlineStore selling Debian DVDs and CDs > beside other things. Sinde I want to donate a part of the sales price > to the Debian Project I am running into some troubles. > > I need

Re: Question to donation from OnlineStore to Debian/SPI

On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:45:36 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > I am ongoing to start a new OnlineStore selling Debian DVDs and CDs > beside other things. Sinde I want to donate a part of the sales price > to the Debian Project I am running into some troubles. > I need and organisation where

Re: Question for all candidates, was: Google SoC 2007 - we're in, sign up quickly!

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:22:40AM +, MJ Ray wrote: > > [...] Is this the sort of "fire and forget" > > reporting that we would expect if Steve McIntyre were elected DPL? > [...] > If writing the full report wasn't Steve's responsability, then it's n

Re: Question for all candidates, was: Google SoC 2007 - we're in, sign up quickly!

On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:22:40AM +, MJ Ray wrote: > Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looks like Google is really everywhere these days. I'm curious about > > SoC: What where the last year's Debian projects and what was there > > outcome? Which projects where successful and which

Re: Question for all candidates, was: Google SoC 2007 - we're in, sign up quickly!

* MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2007-03-16 9:22 +]: > Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looks like Google is really everywhere these days. I'm curious about > > SoC: What where the last year's Debian projects and what was there > > outcome? Which projects where successful and w

Re: question

On Thursday 25 January 2007 07:48, Estudio SIMA wrote: > Hi, just a question, which distributions of Linux are REAL open-source, > non-commercial 100% for commercial use? > > I'm doing intelligent houses i need a stable version of linux for the > server that runs my programs, control the circuits,e

Re: question sur les paquets debian

Rough Translation: hi, Since quite a time I look for an answer on your site, but I can't find it. In the list of packages of the stable suite, some packages are followed by a [security] mention. What does that mention means, that the apckages has security flaws, or that they have been

Re: Question And Proposal For All Candidates

On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, David Nusinow wrote: > > That's also the logic of my proposal of having more "polls": > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/02/msg00065.html > > (just ignore the "social pressure" idea also elaborated in the same mail, > > it's definitely not a good one) > > The prob

Re: Question And Proposal For All Candidates

On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 08:24:55AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, David Nusinow wrote: > > system of governance take over." Fundamentally, this could have happened at > > any time with any of the problematic discussions of the past, but it didn't > > because no developer stepp

Re: Question And Proposal For All Candidates

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, David Nusinow wrote: > system of governance take over." Fundamentally, this could have happened at > any time with any of the problematic discussions of the past, but it didn't > because no developer stepped up to make this decision. And because a full-fledge GR is a lot of wo

Re: Question And Proposal For All Candidates

On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:29:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: My question, finally, to all candidates, is this: do you feel that this is within the practical boundaries and limitations of the DPL's office, and do you think that this semi-official responsibility would facilitate overcoming the

Re: Question to all candidates about stable point releases

Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Why ? When you look back at the history of debian-announce (check 1998 for > example), we used to use that list much more than currently. Yes I know. I'm a big fan of debian-announce in that period. Currently though it's a moderated list with a quite limited set of posting

Re: Question to all candidates about stable point releases

On Wed, 08 Mar 2006, Joey Hess wrote: > The main annoying thing about announcing installer betas is that it doesn't > seem entirely proper to post them to debian-announce, and posting to Why ? When you look back at the history of debian-announce (check 1998 for example), we used to use that list m

  1   2   >