On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:28:23PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> a.) giving out access/rights, can be very _motivating_: I can tell
> from my own experience mostly or more clearly in Debian Edu than in
> Debian, that I do a lot of stuff in Debian Edu, because I was
> granted the rights which I ne
Hi,
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 00:32, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Surely the multiple levels are the point she is making?
Please watch the talk :)
An (rather) easy level to achieve could be the debian.org email address that
every associated project member gets quite easily. (And which is a positi
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Mon Oct 27 20:28, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Her basic idea is, that in addictive games the first levels of success are
> > easy to achieve and then it gets harder, but only so slowly so that people
> > dont loose motivation. She also manages very we
On Mon Oct 27 20:28, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Her basic idea is, that in addictive games the first levels of success are
> easy to achieve and then it gets harder, but only so slowly so that people
> dont loose motivation. She also manages very well to carry this over to free
> software developmen
Hi,
On Monday 27 October 2008 17:20, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > If someone is only trustable to package perl modules, shouldn't he be a
> > DM instead of a DD?
> We might want him to be able to package new perl modules on his own? Where
> do you draw the line? If you maintain 20 or 50 perl modules
On 27/10/08 at 17:20 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 27/10/08 at 16:40 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > > - this process might be too heavy with fine-grained privileges as it
> > > > > would
> >
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 27/10/08 at 16:40 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > - this process might be too heavy with fine-grained privileges as it
> > > > would
> > > > require the intervention of many DD each time we have
On 27/10/08 at 16:40 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > - this process might be too heavy with fine-grained privileges as it would
> > > require the intervention of many DD each time we have to grant a right
> > > (when trusting the decision of 2 m
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > - this process might be too heavy with fine-grained privileges as it would
> > require the intervention of many DD each time we have to grant a right
> > (when trusting the decision of 2 members with special rights would be
> > enough).
>
> That
On 27/10/08 at 16:01 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Power-hungry might well be interested by this role but when 20 other
> people have the same power, you really don't gain much with your power.
> Unfairness is difficult to avoid as all human judgment have a subjective
> part… but I don't see why
Hi,
thanks for your comment. For reference, people might not have noticed but
my initial mail was not only a reply to liw's mail but a real alternative
proposal. BTW, I added some further explanations on my blog:
http://www.ouaza.com/wp/2008/10/27/debian-membership-reform/
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lu
Hi,
On 24/10/08 at 21:59 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> As such I really don't buy that all DD should be equal when it comes to
> technical work however I do think we have to move in the direction where
> we broaden our membership to new kind of contributors and that all
> contributors should hav
Hello,
I have read the posts about this long awaited subject discussion.
(please, forgive my poor english, and ask for details)
Interesting ideas to register, already posted by others:
- Simplify things.
* There are too much overloaded people already. Teams should be
emphasized.
* There are to
13 matches
Mail list logo
