Re: call for seconds - request for removal of DM registrations

2007-10-29 Thread Bart Martens
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 09:22 +0100, Bart Martens wrote: > Dear DD's, > > I think that Joerg was very reasonable with this message: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/10/msg00115.html > > The debate that followed doesn't seem to lead to a solution that makes > the existing DM registratio

Miriam Ruiz and Cameron Dale advocated for the DM keyring in beta test (Was: Re: call for seconds - request for removal of DM registrations)

2007-10-28 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
[Please cc me if you trim the replies to -newmaint only, I do follow -project] [This relates to the fact that there are currently three non-DD people in the Debian Maintainer keyring, which is in beta-test, and some people feel that this should be announced to -newmaint, as per the GR text. See re

Re: call for seconds - request for removal of DM registrations

2007-10-28 Thread Bart Martens
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 14:57 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The "good reasons" for requesting the removal of inappropriate additions > > to the DM keyring are > > Why is it better to introduce more work for the DM Keyring team than > ask a simple apology?

Re: call for seconds - request for removal of DM registrations

2007-10-28 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The "good reasons" for requesting the removal of inappropriate additions >> to the DM keyring are > Why is it better to introduce more work for the DM Keyring team than > ask a simple apology? Because the "DM

Re: call for seconds - request for removal of DM registrations

2007-10-28 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The "good reasons" for requesting the removal of inappropriate additions > to the DM keyring are Why is it better to introduce more work for the DM Keyring team than ask a simple apology? Also, you are aware that even if multiple DD's do second your reque

Re: call for seconds - request for removal of DM registrations

2007-10-28 Thread Bart Martens
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 09:38 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Don't you have anything better to do than to try to escalate the situation? I'll read that as a rethoric question. > > What are the good reasons to remove those maintainers? The "good reasons" for requesting the removal of inappropria

Re: call for seconds - request for removal of DM registrations

2007-10-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Bart Martens wrote: > I hereby call for other DD's to second this request in a signed message > so that our request conforms to this part of the GR rules: > > "The initial policy is that removals from the keyring will occur > under any of the following cir

Three non-DD beta testers added to the DM keyring (Was: call for seconds - request for removal of DM registrations)

2007-10-28 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Just lending a helpful hand to the DM team here, hopefully you aren't offended. The following three persons have been added to the DM keyring for beta testing the DM system. Comment: adding Fathi Boudra as debian-maintainer Recommended-By: Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Anthony To

call for seconds - request for removal of DM registrations

2007-10-28 Thread Bart Martens
Dear DD's, I think that Joerg was very reasonable with this message: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/10/msg00115.html The debate that followed doesn't seem to lead to a solution that makes the existing DM registrations conform the the rules of the voted GR. Multiple DD's have failed t