On Tue, 06 Aug 2019, Zlatan Todorić wrote:
> Honestly, sadly I think it is mistake letting you back into Project
What about reading debian-private and the discussion concerning other
groups involved in the hiccup you could see that obviously it has not been
settled completely.
That was all I sai
On August 5, 2019 4:55:31 PM GMT+02:00, Norbert Preining
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> In one of these cases there was some >>overreaction and it has at least
>> partially (possibly even mostly) been dealt >>with.
>
>Very partially IMNSHO.
>
>Norbert
>
>--
>PREINING Norbert >h
On 5 Aug 2019 20:17, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:51:06PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Did anyone actually bother to click on the link?
How much of debian-private (from when to when) was leaked?
If no one even bothered to look, well, that's fine too.
Several initial (?) e
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:51:06PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Did anyone actually bother to click on the link?
> How much of debian-private (from when to when) was leaked?
> If no one even bothered to look, well, that's fine too.
Several initial (?) emails from 1996 or so.
--
WBR, wRAR
signatu
Did anyone actually bother to click on the link?
How much of debian-private (from when to when) was leaked?
If no one even bothered to look, well, that's fine too.
Hi,
> In one of these cases there was some overreaction and it has at least
> partially (possibly even mostly) been dealt with.
Very partially IMNSHO.
Norbert
--
PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live +
On 2019/08/05 14:52, Debi Leaks wrote:
> You and your band of thugs try to humiliate and blackmail two long standing
> volunteers to make forced confessions at christmas and now you complain that
> you are the victim?
If you're referring to the two cases that I think you're trying to refer
to th
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:52:20PM +, Debi Leaks wrote:
> On Monday, August 5, 2019 12:07 PM, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:50:27PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >
> > > And I think he worries more about Debian then the majority of us.
> > > That is something that does worr
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, August 5, 2019 12:07 PM, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:50:27PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> > And I think he worries more about Debian then the majority of us.
> > That is something that does worry me.
>
> I this this is more obs
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:50:27PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> And I think he worries more about Debian then the majority of us.
> That is something that does worry me.
I this this is more obsession[1] than worry: when one worries about
someone or something, one doesn't go on stalking and hara
> On Aug 5, 2019, at 18:50, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> Advice how to cope with it, is welcome.
I don't know if fading out debian-private could be one way to go.
I have this idea in mind for the following reasons:
1. To eliminate the "this should be in public list" confusion.
2. To prevent unw
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:31:44PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 2019/08/05 12:25, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> https://pastebin.com/S0meBait
> >
> > It's basically just you throwing rocks at us, Daniel.
>
> He probably has more protonmail accounts by now than anyone else in Debian.
And I thin
12 matches
Mail list logo
