Re: A quiet reminder: please be considerate.

Russ Allbery writes: ... > I have also checked all messages to the moderation queue since March 11th > and can't find any messages from Norbert, so whatever is going on there > seems to be happening upstream of moderation. His mail was both to me and the list. I didn't notice this and replied as

Re: A quiet reminder: please be considerate.

Brian Thompson writes: > The biggest problem of moderating troll posts is that the definition of > trolling varies broadly across individuals. Agreed, and the moderation of debian-project is very sensitive to that. We're addressing this by erring on the side of approval and only rejecting the me

Re: A quiet reminder: please be considerate.

-- -Brian On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 09:09 +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > "Andrew M.A. Cater" writes: > > ... > > * It shouldn't need twenty people to make a point or start > > arguments and > >   counter arguments. If someone has already written what you would > > have wanted > >   to write, that's

Re: Re: A quiet reminder: please be considerate.

On Sat, 2022-03-26 at 11:18 +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > Norbert Preining writes: > > Obviously my emails have been considered spam or my email a throw-away > > one, since from my last 4 emails to d-p not a single one has arrived. > > > > Reality seems to be very different from what you and Steve

Re: Re: A quiet reminder: please be considerate.

Norbert Preining writes: > Hi Phil, > >> I've only rejected a handful of messages, and they were almost all >> obvious SPAM, and IIRC one trolling attempt from a throw-away address, >> not otherwise involved in the discussion. > > Obviously my emails have been considered spam or my email a throw-

Re: How about using moderation as a delay system for bad threads? (Re: A quiet reminder: please be considerate.)

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 08:10:39AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Hello, > > Le Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 11:54:02AM +, Steve McIntyre a écrit : > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 09:09:20AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > > > > > >Unless I've misunderstood completely, we do not judge the content of the > >

How about using moderation as a delay system for bad threads? (Re: A quiet reminder: please be considerate.)

Hello, Le Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 11:54:02AM +, Steve McIntyre a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 09:09:20AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > > > >Unless I've misunderstood completely, we do not judge the content of the > >messages, except that we filter out very obviously abusive trolling that > >t

Re: A quiet reminder: please be considerate.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 09:09:20AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: >"Andrew M.A. Cater" writes: > >... >> * It shouldn't need twenty people to make a point or start arguments and >> counter arguments. If someone has already written what you would have >> wanted >> to write, that's fine: in many ca

Re: A quiet reminder: please be considerate.

"Andrew M.A. Cater" writes: ... > * It shouldn't need twenty people to make a point or start arguments and > counter arguments. If someone has already written what you would have wanted > to write, that's fine: in many cases you can safely leave it there. > The list is moderated: the volunt

A quiet reminder: please be considerate.

Readers of Debian-project This is a quiet reminder that debian-project and all Debian mailing lists are governed by the mailing lists code of conduct and the main Debian code of conduct. * Please be considerate of each other: assume good faith and treat each other with the respect that each

Re: Bug#273323: doc-debian: please ship typesettable version of social contract and dfsg documents

Diederik de Haas wrote: > But then the question becomes: what is the authoritative version? Was the Social Contract approved by a General Resolution? If so, then the authoritative version is the text that appeared in the GR ballot. Gerardo

Re: Bug#273323: doc-debian: please ship typesettable version of social contract and dfsg documents

On donderdag 9 september 2021 05:56:17 CEST Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 1:11 PM Diederik de Haas wrote: > > But then the question becomes: what is the authoritative version? > > The other copies of it (in doc-debian and the doc directory of the > Debian apt archive) are all copied/bu

Re: Bug#273323: doc-debian: please ship typesettable version of social contract and dfsg documents

On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 1:11 PM Diederik de Haas wrote: > But then the question becomes: what is the authoritative version? The other copies of it (in doc-debian and the doc directory of the Debian apt archive) are all copied/built from the version on the website. https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-tea

Re: Bug#273323: doc-debian: please ship typesettable version of social contract and dfsg documents

On woensdag 8 september 2021 09:22:11 CEST Gard Spreemann wrote: > there should perhaps be an authoritative version of the text, > from which PDF, whatever-printable, HTML, etc. can be generated I think that's a good idea. But then the question becomes: what is the authoritative version? I get th

Re: Bug#273323: doc-debian: please ship typesettable version of social contract and dfsg documents

Diederik de Haas writes: > I only looked at the pdf and it's a very nice start, thanks! > > […] Thanks for the feedback. Daniel Lange's email made me think that there should perhaps be an authoritative version of the text, from which PDF, whatever-printable, HTML, etc. can be generated (using

Re: Bug#273323: doc-debian: please ship typesettable version of social contract and dfsg documents

On dinsdag 7 september 2021 11:26:15 CEST Gard Spreemann wrote: > Diederik de Haas writes: > > I wanted to print the Debian Social Contract, which turned out to be WAY > > more difficult then I expected and then it should be. > > ... > > Are any of these helpful? I'm happy to do more iterations –

Re: Bug#273323: doc-debian: please ship typesettable version of social contract and dfsg documents

Diederik de Haas writes: > I wanted to print the Debian Social Contract, which turned out to be WAY > more difficult then I expected and then it should be. > > So I went to https://www.debian.org/social_contract and wanted to print > that. Apparently there isn't a print stylesheet for it, so if

Bug#273323: doc-debian: please ship typesettable version of social contract and dfsg documents

Package: doc-debian Version: 6.5 Followup-For: Bug #273323 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-project@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I wanted to print the Debian Social Contract, which turned out to be WAY more difficult then I expected and then it should be. So I went to htt

Re: How to Fix the apt-get install error: “Media change: please insert the disc labeled ...” in Debian 10.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 04:04:55PM +0800, Edgar Villanueva Jr wrote: > I was amazed by the description that Debian is robust and reliable etc. So > I decided to install it. But when I try to install from terminal "Fix the > apt-get install error: “Media change: please insert th

Re: How to Fix the apt-get install error: “Media change: please insert the disc labeled ...” in Debian 10.

Hi Edgar, Am 19.11.20 um 09:04 schrieb Edgar Villanueva Jr: I was amazed by the description that Debian is robust and reliable etc. So I decided to install it. But when I try to install from terminal "Fix the apt-get install error: “Media change: please insert the disc labeled ...” appea

How to Fix the apt-get install error: “Media change: please insert the disc labeled ...” in Debian 10.

I was amazed by the description that Debian is robust and reliable etc. So I decided to install it. But when I try to install from terminal "Fix the apt-get install error: “Media change: please insert the disc labeled ...” appears. I can't also install software thru discover. I really

Re: Please consider making "corectrl" part of the debian distribution

On Sb, 27 iun 20, 08:46:37, Peter Ehlert wrote: > > On 6/27/20 7:18 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > In this particular case you might want to file an RFP (Request For > > Package). > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/RFP > > very interesting.  I did not know of the RFP facility > > can that also

Re: Please consider making "corectrl" part of the debian distribution

On 27.06.20 16:18, Andrei POPESCU wrote: [Assuming you are not subscribed, sorry for the Cc: in case you are] On Sb, 27 iun 20, 15:21:42, hans_pali...@web.de wrote: please consider making the application "corectrl" a part of the official debian (testing) distribution within th

gparted alternatives Re: Please consider making "corectrl" part of the debian distribution

On 27.06.20 17:46, Peter Ehlert wrote: On 6/27/20 7:18 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: [Assuming you are not subscribed, sorry for the Cc: in case you are] On Sb, 27 iun 20, 15:21:42, hans_pali...@web.de wrote: please consider making the application "corectrl" a part of the offic

Re: Please consider making "corectrl" part of the debian distribution

On 6/27/20 7:18 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: [Assuming you are not subscribed, sorry for the Cc: in case you are] On Sb, 27 iun 20, 15:21:42, hans_pali...@web.de wrote: please consider making the application "corectrl" a part of the official debian (testing) distribution within th

Re: Please consider making "corectrl" part of the debian distribution

[Assuming you are not subscribed, sorry for the Cc: in case you are] On Sb, 27 iun 20, 15:21:42, hans_pali...@web.de wrote: > > please consider making the application "corectrl" a part of the > official debian (testing) distribution within the next few month. Please note tha

Please consider making "corectrl" part of the debian distribution

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, please consider making the application "corectrl" a part of the official debian (testing) distribution within the next few month. For the upcoming hardware launch of the AMD Ryzen 4000 Desktop CPU Processors and the AMD Radeon Navi 21 GPUs als w

Guest article pitch -- please take a look

their customers’ data and in turn their own profits. If you’re interested, please let me know. Thank you for your time, Chelsea Chelsea Lamb Businesspop.net <https://www.businesspop.net/> | chel...@businesspop.net

Guest article pitch -- will you please take a look?

investments end up paying for themselves for small business owners, i.e. they’re so beneficial the costs are well worth it! Would this be a topic you’d be interested in seeing covered in a guest article for your site? If so, please let me know, and I’ll start researching and writing. Thanks for

Bug#929516: [project] Please provide onion services using next-gen (v3) onion addresses

Package: project Version: current adresses Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Some time ago the tor project introduced 56 character long, next-gen (v3) onion addresses, which also utilize stronger cryptography. However, Debian is still using v2 onion addresses for

Re: please contact me

Wysłano z mojego smartfona Samsung Galaxy.

Re: Please do not publish private emails on the Debian mailing lists.

ribune. > > > > Sorry for the noise, and have a nice day, all ! > > Hi, > > I think that publishing private emails on the Debian lists is highly > inappropriate. Thanks for your apologies, but please bear in mind that > this is not just about noise. Please do not do

Please do not publish private emails on the Debian mailing lists.

shing private emails on the Debian lists is highly inappropriate. Thanks for your apologies, but please bear in mind that this is not just about noise. Please do not do that again, with any sender. Cheers, Charles -- Charles Plessy Akano, Uruma, Okinawa, Japan

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On 08/30/2017 01:52 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > Am 2017-08-30 09:01, schrieb Marc Haber: >> And I hope that it's really hard to fuck up here and to send private >> keys to the keyserver. > > I don't think that's possible with GnuPG command line, as far as > I know GnuPG will only ever send publi

Re: [summary] Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

Le Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 08:09:00PM +, Sotirios Vrachas a écrit : > > - https://wiki.debian.org/GnuPG/StubKe > This page does not exist. > Sorry, it was . Have a nice Sunday, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan

Re: [summary] Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

> - https://wiki.debian.org/GnuPG/StubKe This page does not exist. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[summary] Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

Hello everybody, that thread was very interesting, and I tried to input in wiki.debian.org the information that seemed to not be covered yet. Most of the input went in two new pages: - https://wiki.debian.org/OfflineMasterKey - https://wiki.debian.org/GnuPG/StubKe I did my best to preserve at

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

Hello, On Wed, Aug 30 2017, Marc Haber wrote: > People keep mentioning to store the private key on a LUKS-encrypted > device. Why? Is the private key encryption that happens inside GnuPG > itself when you protect your private key with a passphrase not > sufficient? You can pass the --iter-time o

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:09:38 +0100, Jonathan McDowell writes: >I think NIIBE was selling them for about €30 at DebConf, so that's a >reasonable mark up. He said Seeed are currently changing business model >to move away from low volume devices, but despite what their website >says they do still have

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 12:50 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > That's a point, but I cannot validate whether the free hardware > design running the free software crypto app isn't backdoored anyway due > to lack of knowledge and expertise. Some large fraction of the world could/would make the same argument

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

Am 2017-08-30 14:45, schrieb Marc Haber: On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 01:52:54PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: Well, you could create a completely separate key pair (with a separate master key) for Debian purposes only. That would double the effort of obtaining signatures and also double the bur

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

Ian, thanks for your level-headed response and your solid reasoning. On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:10:34PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > How far down the paranoia road you want to go is up to you, but buying > an open hardware / libre firmware security device, rather than a > proprietary one, has rela

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 01:52:54PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > Am 2017-08-30 09:01, schrieb Marc Haber: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:45PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > > wrote: > > > The **public** portion of *every* key (master and all subkeys) go into > > > the public keyrings an

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

Marc Haber [2017-08-30 09:01:09+02] wrote: > People keep mentioning to store the private key on a LUKS-encrypted > device. Why? Is the private key encryption that happens inside GnuPG > itself when you protect your private key with a passphrase not > sufficient? A strong passphrase for the key it

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

Am 2017-08-30 09:01, schrieb Marc Haber: On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:07:45PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: The **public** portion of *every* key (master and all subkeys) go into the public keyrings and also in the Debian keyring. gnupg will handle this automatically if you use "--exp

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

I seem to have offended people by trying to make up my mind and introducing arguments into the discussion that might not be wanted. I can only lose by continuing this thread. No offense was ever intended, and neither was an attack. Greetings Marc -- --

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:50:53PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:42:13PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > * with Yubikey 4 (suspected): they send the secret handshake, get a > > copy of the key, and you don't even know anything happened > > That's a point, but I cannot valid

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

Marc Haber writes ("Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles"): > That's a point, but I cannot validate whether the free hardware > design running the free software crypto app isn't backdoored anyway due > to lack of knowledge and expertise. You don't need to

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:42:13PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:17:33PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > > The Start is based on the GnuK and I think should be upgradable to do 4K > > > keys. The Pro uses

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:17:33PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > The Start is based on the GnuK and I think should be upgradable to do 4K > > keys. The Pro uses a non-free smartcard internally for the RSA > > operations. I believe

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:34:35PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > Their web page says that it will only suppor 2048 bit RSA keys, which is > > the limitation of most USB crypto tokens on the market today. The > > Nitrokey Pro will a

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:34:35PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 01:41:39PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > * GnuK: My favourite choice. It's slow with RSA4096, but does > > support it. The hardware is open. The software is open (you can > > compile and flas

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

o, as long as you keep > control of the master key, you can revoke any subkey. Understood. I didn't find that information in all clearness anywhere. > It goes without saying that losing control of your revocation > certificate can open you to a DoS attack, so please keep it protecte

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

rtificate can open you to a DoS attack, so please keep it protected somehow, but NOT in a way you might find yourself unable to use it. > - What key goes into the Debian keyring? A signing (only?) subkey of the > certification master key? Is it recommended to have this key > "ava

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 01:41:39PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > * If you don't want to buy hardware, use an offline master key. Create >a certification only master key using something like PGP Clean Room >on a non-networked host, and store that on a USB key you only ever put >into

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On 08/29/2017 07:34 PM, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 01:41:39PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: >> * Yubikey. I'm not sure about this; it's entirely closed these days >> I believe. However they're easily available and I understand >> they're pretty robust in terms of

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 01:41:39PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > * GnuK: My favourite choice. It's slow with RSA4096, but does > support it. The hardware is open. The software is open (you can > compile and flash it using tools available in main). Upstream is > responsive

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 04:52:36PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > I see no reason why the master key should ever be used for > > signatures in such a scenario, so it seems sensible to indicate that > > it is purely for certification. >

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:08:16AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 11 2017, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > > * If you don't want to buy hardware, use an offline master > > > key. Create > > >a certification only master key using somethi

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

transferred to the smartcard (gpg --edit-key $keyid, then select the subkey to transfer, then keytocard, please read the docs before doing this!) - when you have a dongle plugged in you can also fetch the public key associated with it from the keyserver (gpg --card-edit, then fet

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Fri, Aug 11 2017, Christian Seiler wrote: > - on the computers I use daily the filesystem doesn't contain any > private keys, but only stubs for the subkeys so that GnuPG > automatically tells me to insert the key I think I know what you mean by "stub", but what gpg command generates

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

r key should ever be used for signatures in such a scenario, so it seems sensible to indicate that it is purely for certification. J. -- /-\ |"Could I have an 'E', please, |@/ Debian GNU/Linux Developer |Bob?" (Blockbusters) \- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

Hello, Thank you for the explanation. On Fri, Aug 11 2017, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > * If you don't want to buy hardware, use an offline master > key. Create >a certification only master key using something like PGP Clean Room >on a non-networked host [...] By default, GnuPG creates

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

Hi, Am 2017-08-11 14:41, schrieb Jonathan McDowell: * Yubikey. I'm not sure about this; it's entirely closed these days I believe. However they're easily available and I understand they're pretty robust in terms of living on a keyring all the time. I bought a YubiKey 4 a

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 10:16:29PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > It would be nice if someone knowledgeable could educate the rest of us > about physical key dongles -- a number of DDs/DMs/contributors still > keep their secret keys on a regular disk, and could use a primer. Me > included. I do ha

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On 02/08/17 21:16, Adam Borowski wrote: > Hi! > Continuing from IRC: > It would be nice if someone knowledgeable could educate the rest of us about > physical key dongles -- a number of DDs/DMs/contributors still keep their > secret keys on a regular disk, and could use a primer. Me included. I d

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

o. Just don't expect my to wipe the card, I still need to do some uploads to Debian ;-) -- Could you people please use IRC like normal people?!? -- Amaya Rodrigo Sastre, trying to quiet down the buzz in the DebConf 2008 Hacklab

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

rever, etc. Additionally, unfortunately accessing smartcards from software isn't always an entirely painless operation, and that may result in things like https://twitter.com/wouter_verhelst/status/844686341711581185 [1] -- Could you people please use IRC like normal people?!? -- Amaya Rodrigo Sastre, trying to quiet down the buzz in the DebConf 2008 Hacklab

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

Quoting Adam Borowski (2017-08-02 16:16:29) > There are docs available on the interwebs, but: > 21:22 < lamby> The concept of following random docs/commands on the web in >order to get a "super secure" key makes me smie :) Ah - enlightening: I always wondered what a smiey looked li

Re: wanted: educate us please on key dongles

On 08/02/2017 10:16 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: Hi! Continuing from IRC: It would be nice if someone knowledgeable could educate the rest of us about physical key dongles -- a number of DDs/DMs/contributors still keep their secret keys on a regular disk, and could use a primer. Me included. I do

wanted: educate us please on key dongles

Hi! Continuing from IRC: It would be nice if someone knowledgeable could educate the rest of us about physical key dongles -- a number of DDs/DMs/contributors still keep their secret keys on a regular disk, and could use a primer. Me included. I do have a backup key with plenty of sigs that's sto

Re: Information Please.

Sww Sent from my iPhone

Re: I'm scared and offended by your kfreebsd port. Sorry. Please help me feel better?

Hi Christopher, Christopher Chalmers writes: > Hi Debian project! > > I had used Debian 6.5 and Debian 6.7 and tried Debian 7.0 – 7.2 And I > liked them, but I found out that freebsd with the young devil mascot > and a devil head icon, was part of Debian and it scared the sh#t out > of me. You

I'm scared and offended by your kfreebsd port. Sorry. Please help me feel better?

g that freebsd and macOSX get discontinued in the near future and use of the devil in products stops soon, but I don’t know how likely that is. Please help. Maybe you can make me feel better by explaining that freebsd is no longer part of the official release since Debian 8. And that hopefully

Re: please fix archive.debian.net (was: Expired HTTPS cert)

tion on your service. This is causing real pains for us. > > Please fix your service. I have pointed DNS away from the broken archive.debian.net service for now. -- | .''`. ** Debian ** Peter Palfrader | : :'

please contact me

You have been chosen for the inheritance of late Craig peters, who died in an Auto crash June 2016. Please contact me for more details

please remove this page

Hi, When I did some search for my name; "Titiu Claudiu" I found this url: https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2004/11/msg00071.html I am not the owner of the urls, emails and someone use illegal my names. Please delete this page or remove my name urgently. After that I need t

Please remove this from your server. Thanks a lot Theme: Hallo wo bekomme ein Download DVD.iso mit KDE?????

carlos maturana schrieb am 16:04 Sonntag, 11.Januar 2015: The Topic or theme is: Hallo wo bekomme ein Download DVD.iso mit KDE? Please remove it from your server because there are many people who uses my email address for spam and scam

Re: Bug#772645: lists.debian.org: Please create debian-moderat...@lists.debian.org

ot exclude moderators who are unwilling to send complaints publicly, > I believe that the mailing list should be private (but archived with > archives accessible to DD only) and only open to Debian developers by > default. Possibly non-DD could join but they would need the invitation of > a

Bug#772645: lists.debian.org: Please create debian-moderat...@lists.debian.org

c discussion of this idea (in that case, please do not keep the bug in copy), and to sollicit a few "ack" from other DD who are already doing that kind of moderation work (or would like to start doing it in a more organized way). Thank you. FTR, this idea was initially submitted in a debian-

Re: What is the content of DEBIAN CD - please tell us more about DEBIAN CD?

You have contacted the Debian project mailing list, which is not for user support, please contact one of the Debian user supportchannels for help. https://www.debian.org/support https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ http://forums.debian.net/ http://ask.debian.net/ irc://irc.oftc.net/debian

What is the content of DEBIAN CD - please tell us more about DEBIAN CD?

-- Henry Udoye. 4165 Whiteplains Road. P. O. Box 1290. Bronx. N. Y. 10466 Phone : 914-316-1854. Fax : 206-350-3803 hudoye1...@gmail.com Hello: What is the content of DEBIAN CD? What are the functions and features? What are the purposes and uses? Can it help any person learn how to code or s

Re: Bug#747290: Please display the new Code of Conduct

iscussion. Serious or persistent offenders will be temporarily or permanently banned from communicating through Debian's systems. Complaints should be made (in private) to the administrators of the Debian communication forum in question. To find contact informa

Bug#747290: Please display the new Code of Conduct

Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-project@lists.debian.org On Ma, 06 mai 14, 13:45:11, Brian Gupta wrote: > > All kidding aside, is there a plan to post the CoC, and make it easy > to find from www.d.o? (Perhaps either in the "About" section, or on > the "about Debia

Re: Please give a summary (Was: Debian services and Debian infrastructure)

Hi Ian, On 21/01/14 at 18:11 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Lucas seems to be intending to mediate these offers to interested DDs > (who have Debian-related uses for a VM) directly, with the apparent > expectation that those DDs would end up administering those VMs > directly in an ad hoc manner. DS

Re: Please give a summary (Was: Debian services and Debian infrastructure)

camp, Ian Jackson said: > Andreas Tille writes ("Please give a summary (Was: Debian services and Debian > infrastructure)"): > > as a random reader I have the feeling that this thread is about a > > conflict between DSA members and DPL. For me all these mails do not > >

Re: Please give a summary (Was: Debian services and Debian infrastructure)

Hi Andreas, On 21/01/14 at 17:51 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > as a random reader I have the feeling that this thread is about a > conflict between DSA members and DPL. For me all these mails do not > make the slightest sense and it would help if someone could give a > summary what you a

Re: Please give a summary (Was: Debian services and Debian infrastructure)

Andreas Tille writes ("Please give a summary (Was: Debian services and Debian infrastructure)"): > as a random reader I have the feeling that this thread is about a > conflict between DSA members and DPL. For me all these mails do not > make the slightest sense and it would he

Please give a summary (Was: Debian services and Debian infrastructure)

Hi, as a random reader I have the feeling that this thread is about a conflict between DSA members and DPL. For me all these mails do not make the slightest sense and it would help if someone could give a summary what you are talking about and if possible give some example what you think is OK an

Re: Documentation of the Dpkg triggers in the Policy (please).

Le Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:22:50PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : > > I don't think your attitude is at all the cause. Quite to the contrary, I > really appreciate your continued effort to push this forward, since I > think it's a major gap in Policy at the moment. I'm sorry that it's been > so f

Re: Documentation of the Dpkg triggers in the Policy (please).

ges in my life at the moment. :/ > Lastly, if people think that my attitude is the cause of the blocked > situation, please let me know (in public or private) so that I will stop > disturbing with my attempts to participate. Frankly speaking, the > current situation makes me bang my h

Documentation of the Dpkg triggers in the Policy (please).

their interest in editing the Policy, do something about it ? Lastly, if people think that my attitude is the cause of the blocked situation, please let me know (in public or private) so that I will stop disturbing with my attempts to participate. Frankly speaking, the current situation makes me

urgent please read it is important to us

from wdow ALLAH to me you have problems in male number to you it is good to have a husband in islamic way for life time in egypt and in saudi arabia from wdow ALLAH to us can you please reply to me if you accept my offer with marrige to any girl accept to be moslem for ever and will sign on that as

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

* Lucas Nussbaum (lea...@debian.org) [140104 16:30]: > On 04/01/14 at 14:04 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > See https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2013/12/msg00049.html thanks. > > (Actually I think we should have our delegations so that if the > > current delegates add someone new, inform the

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

Hi, On 04/01/14 at 14:04 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > * Martin Zobel-Helas (zo...@debian.org) [131202 22:11]: > > Hi Lucas, > > > > I am pleased to announce that DSA has promoted Héctor Orón Martínez to a > > full member of the team. > > &

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

Hi Lucas, * Martin Zobel-Helas (zo...@debian.org) [131202 22:11]: > Hi Lucas, > > I am pleased to announce that DSA has promoted Héctor Orón Martínez to a > full member of the team. > > Please update the delegation for the Debian System Administrators > accordingly. Did

Please send responses to BTS bans to ow...@bugs.debian.org, not debian-priv...@lists.debian.org

When individuals or e-mail addresses are banned from utilizing the BTS, these bans are published on debian-priv...@lists.debian.org. If you are a DD who has substantial questions or concerns regarding BTS bans, please send them to ow...@bugs.debian.org, not debian-priv...@lists.debian.org. On

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:32:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > It absolutely should. The constitution stipulates that authority flows from > the developers, through the DPL, to the delegated teams. To say that the > DPL delegation is nothing than a rubber stamp is to say that the team does > n

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

> Within the last year he has shared more and more of our duties and my > colleagues and I thought it high time that he not only be part of the > team, but that he also be recognized by the project as such.  My > colleagues and I are very excited to have him onboard.  Please rest > as

Re: Please update the DSA delegation

he team, but that he also be recognized by the project as such.  My colleagues and I are very excited to have him onboard.  Please rest assured that no offense was intended. Best regards, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer

  1   2   3   4   5   >