Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.26-27_hppa.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1r6c1i-tx...@franck.debian.org
2011/9/20 Adam D. Barratt :
> On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 22:20 +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote:
>> While testing ctdb (1.0.112-12-2) with apache2 failover, I find that
>> the proposed patch was not good (92-apache-service-enable.diff from
>> http://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable_diffs/ctdb_1.0.1
The patches have been in unstable for a few days now and things seem
fine.
Could you please confirm whether I can upload them to stable as well?
Thanks,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 22:20 +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> While testing ctdb (1.0.112-12-2) with apache2 failover, I find that
> the proposed patch was not good (92-apache-service-enable.diff from
> http://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable_diffs/ctdb_1.0.112-12-2.debdiff).
>
> So, I prop
Hi,
While testing ctdb (1.0.112-12-2) with apache2 failover, I find that
the proposed patch was not good (92-apache-service-enable.diff from
http://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable_diffs/ctdb_1.0.112-12-2.debdiff).
So, I propose another upload with the following diff from -2:
Index: de
Processing changes file: firmware-nonfree_0.28+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: widelands_15-3squeeze2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: shelldap_0.2-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 11:37 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> There have been no furhter folluwups on the "ca-certificates version
> number reuse" thread for a while now. My conclusion is that we need to
> prepare an upload targeted at stable to ensure the change is also included
> in the point relea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 638190 + pending
Bug #638190 [release.debian.org] pu: package shelldap/0.2-1+squeeze1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
638190: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
tag 638190 + pending
thanks
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 09:47 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 06:10:09PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Assuming the resulting package has been tested on squeeze, please go
> > ahead.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Okay, I have uploaded the package.
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 18:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 22:07 +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote:
> > I've prepared an update for widelands in squeeze in response to
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624316
> >
> > The security fix 1:15-3squeeze1 for bug #617960
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 639676 - moreinfo + confirmed
Bug #639676 [release.debian.org] pu: package pbuilder/0.199+nmu1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #639676 [release.debian.org] pu: package pbuilder/0.199+nmu1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
tag 639676 - moreinfo + confirmed
thanks
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 11:15 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 17:22:46 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:26 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > + * Cherry-pick from 0.199+nmu4: Rename the /run script from --exec
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 12:33 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Adam (2011.09.17_18:09:13_+0200)
> > One quick question - doesn't this change:
> >
> > +- logfile-visibility-567576.patch: Channels must be explicitly
> > configured
> > + to have publicly readable logs. (LP: #567576)
> >
> >
Hi Gerrit et al,
I'd therefore like to propose
git://repo.or.cz/git/debian/jrn.git debian-stable
aka
git://git.debian.org/~jrnieder-guest/git.git debian-stable
(commit 011ee3d5) for upload to stable. It fixes a few bugs:
- off-by-one in commit message parsing (not filed in BTS)
- Bug#6
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_0.5.4-1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_0.5.4-1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_0.5.4-1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_0.5.4-1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ffmpeg_0.5.4-1_kfreebsd-
Hi Adam (2011.09.17_18:09:13_+0200)
> If you're going to do that, you need to either (preferably) CC the
> receiving package on your mail, or send a separate mail. What tends to
> happen (as in this case) is that the control@ reassign gets processed
> after the rest of the mail has been received a
Hi Adam
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 06:10:09PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> tag 638190 + confirmed
> thanks
>
> On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 19:56 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Please find attached the proposed debdiff without the Recommends
> > addition. It takes upstream patch but with the dis
17 matches
Mail list logo
