On 01.08.2012 06:22, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
adsb@franck:~$ dpkg-source -x
ftp/pool/contrib/v/vmware-manager/vmware-manager_0.2.0-1.dsc v-m1
[...]
adsb@franck:~$ dpkg-source -x
ftp/pool/contrib/v/vmware-manager/vmware-manager_0.2.0-2.dsc v-m2
[...]
adsb@franck:~$ diff -adNru v-m1 v-m2 | diffstat
[
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:55 +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:15:49 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> >Are "vwm" and "vmm" supposed to be identical, other than the name
> >change? The version of "vmm" shipped in -2 appears to include new
> >changes which are then not carrie
On 08/01/2012 01:42 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> tests on my computer.
>
> As it was already explained to you before the release of Squeeze, this is far
> far far away from proper testing for a package like open-vm-tools. It should
> be tested on current (and maybe even older) ESX instalations. Bal
On 08/01/2012 12:29 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I don't think that's agreed upon. If anything default options
> should be used.
i don't think so, see debconf bofh.
the bottom line is that -9 compresses better than -6, and that -9 is
not a problem on amd64 and i386, see debconf talk for more informa
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package xen-api
The current version in Wheezy suffers from a wrong default PAM setting of
PAM, giving access to XAPI to any account on th server, as per:
http://lists.xen.org
Dear release managers,
now that texlive-extra 2012.20120611-2 is accepted into unstable and
there the second day, I ask once more for freeze exception:
On Mo, 30 Jul 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear Release managers,
>
> I would like to ask for a freeze exception for
> texlive-extra 20
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:15:49 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:27 +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
>> Please unblock package vmware-manager
>>
>> the version in unstable fixes rc bug #680481,
>> which is a file name conflict between the
>> packages vmm and vmware-manager: b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/31/2012 03:45 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 03:40 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Based on what?
>
> tests on my computer.
As it was already explained to you before the release of Squeeze, this is far
far far away from proper testing
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:47:42PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 03:41 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Which is particularly important for this package because...? And using
> > the -9 option (which is recommended against by the xz documentation)
> > because...?
> i'm definitely not g
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:53:09 +0100
with message-id <1343771589.1551.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683453: unblock: mirror/2.9-62
has caused the Debian Bug report #683453,
regarding unblock: mirror/2.9-62
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mirror
Trivial bugfix to add a missing dependency. Debdiff attached.
unblock mirror/2.9-62
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
I ask for a freeze exception for phpunit-selenium/1.2.6-3
This upload introduces a README.Debian file with vital information for
using this set of classes.
The attached
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 682906 with 683053
Bug #682906 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-defaults/2.7.3-2
682906 was not blocked by any bugs.
682906 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 682906: 683053
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
Processing changes file: automake1.10_1.10.3-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_i386.changes
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:08:15 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#683446: unblock: libqt4pas/2.5-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #683446,
regarding unblock: libqt4pas/2.5-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 19:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 22:24 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Proposed stable update for automake1.10.
>
> +automake1.10 (1:1.10.3-1+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
> +
> + * lib/am/distdir.am: Backport fix for CVE-2012-3386 "Temporary worldw
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 22:45 +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Please unblock package libqt4pas
>
> Rev7 only contains adjustments on the package's symbols file to build on more
> (now all) architectures.
>From a scan of the diff, all of the changes appear to be hurd-i386
related? Given that wheezy
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package libqt4pas
Rev7 only contains adjustments on the package's symbols file to build on more
(now all) architectures. It does not introduce any new issue and is t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please, consider including GMSH into Wheezy.
GMSH is a mesh generator, which is used for preparation of
meshes for different simulation and modelling tasks.
Unfortunately it is affected by
On 2012-07-31 20:33, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> override_dh_makeshlibs:
> - dh_makeshlibs -Xvdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -Xtls/libnvidia-tls.so -- -c0
> + DPKG_GENSYMBOLS_CHECK_LEVEL=0 dh_makeshlibs
> -Xvdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -Xtls/libnvidia-tls.so -- -c0
Most packages are empty transiti
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:11:16 +0100
with message-id <1343765476.1551.5.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683440: unblock: muroard/0.1.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #683440,
regarding unblock: muroard/0.1.10-2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:12:02 +0100
with message-id <1343765522.1551.6.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683437: unblock: ckport/0.1~rc0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683437,
regarding unblock: ckport/0.1~rc0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fglrx-driver
As already discussed in:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01145.html
fglrx-driver could be unblocked now. AMD just released a point rele
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:07:05 +0100
with message-id <1343765225.1551.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683436: unblock: aroarfw/0.1~beta4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #683436,
regarding unblock: aroarfw/0.1~beta4-5
to be marked as done.
This mean
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package otrs2
I have added an upstream patch to fix the postmaster module with IMAPTLS
mailboxes:
* Add backported upstream patch 27-imaptls-more-than-one-email. Using IMAPT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package muroar
It removes - as requested - Philipp as maintainer and also adds an important
upstream patch (01-env-home-validation) to add validation of $HOME.
unblock muroa
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package muroard
This update removes Philipp - as requested - as maintainer.
unblock muroard/0.1.10-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ckport
This update only removes Philipp from the maintainers list, as he had already
requested, to do so.
unblock ckport/0.1~rc0-3
-- System Information:
Debian Rel
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package aroarfw
This update only removes Philipp from the maintainer list, as he had already
requested.
unblock aroarfw/0.1~beta4-5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: w
[Nicholas Breen]
> That bug is waiting on a new cmake upload -- would it be acceptable
> to the RT to remove gromacs from testing, allowing lesstif2 to
> migrate, and then re-admitting a binNMU'ed gromacs after cmake is
> updated? Assuming the lesstif and (as-yet-unavailable) cmake
> migrations t
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:02:55AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> A patched version of lesstif2 appears to have been uploaded. To my
> knowledge it caused mtink to FTBFS, which has been fixed (see #683316).
> There have also been noticed issues with gromacs and cmucl, but these
> appear to be unr
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 14:25 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx
>
> Only translation and documentation updates.
I debated grumbling about the changes to -5's existing changelog, but I
guess the meaning hasn't changed.
This change to debian/
Hi Philipp
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:15:10PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Note, I just first would like to get a pre-approval, if the change is
> > okay to be passed to wheezy.
> >
> > Attached is the debdiff against 0.58-
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:49:50PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-07-23 10:56, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > GLPI 0.83.31 (micro-fix based on 0.83.3) is
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:28:54AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Also (in answer to your other email), I believe it is fine with
> requesting them already now so we are aware of them. :)
Since udeb's have been held, I guess this point is moot in any case. :-)
Just for the record, none of these
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Note, I just first would like to get a pre-approval, if the change is
> okay to be passed to wheezy.
>
> Attached is the debdiff against 0.58-1 currently in wheezy and
> unstable.
ACK.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.a
On 07/31/2012 03:41 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Which is particularly important for this package because...? And using
> the -9 option (which is recommended against by the xz documentation)
> because...?
i'm definitely not going to re-iterate what all the people said about
using xz compression, f
On 07/31/2012 03:40 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Based on what?
tests on my computer.
> If the system is under load, what guarantees that it won't take
> more time?
as often there are no guarantees, but i tested it under quite some cpu
and IO load, and it worked for me.
regarding testing migrati
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 14:34:11 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > + * Switching to xz compression.
> >
> > Why?
>
> smaller package size.
>
Which is particularly important for this package because...? And using
the -9 option (which is recommended against by the xz documentation)
because...?
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 14:34:11 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > + * Adding sleep during restart in initscript.
> >
> > Why one second?
>
> because it sometimes fails to restart if there's no sleep.
>
> > Is it enough?
>
> yes.
>
Based on what? If the system is under load, what guarantees
On 07/31/2012 10:59 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> This still doesn't explain why the change is necessary, and what was
> wrong with the old code. And if it is, which I would be willing to
> believe if given some sort of explanation, it seems to be missing a
> package dependency on kmod.
for the 'wh
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
On 07/31/2012 02:51 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> I checked with Release Team, and they prefer to have written
> communication for upload approvals, so they asked if you could send a
On 07/31/2012 02:34 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 11:07 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> so yet again you managed to make a mess of open-vm-tools short time
>> before a release.
>
> i didn't. please read the whole thread carefully, thank you.
Yes you did, as several people tried to explain
On 07/31/2012 11:07 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> so yet again you managed to make a mess of open-vm-tools short time
> before a release.
i didn't. please read the whole thread carefully, thank you.
> + * Switching to xz compression.
>
> Why?
smaller package size.
> Is this really release critic
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx
Only translation and documentation updates.
debdiff --diffstat ...-5.dsc ...-6.dsc | filterdiff -x '*.po*'
attached.
unblock
On 31.07.2012 04:12, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 23:24 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> Proposed stable update for automake1.9.
This looks like the patches that are already in stable?
+automake1.9 (1.9.6+nogfdl-3.1) unstable; urgenc
On 31.07.2012 04:40, Eric Dorland wrote:
Proposed stable update for automake1.7.
Please go ahead; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.de
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:03:18 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#683387: unblock: transmission/2.52-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683387,
regarding unblock: transmission/2.52-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Hi,
I'm one of the maintainers of the ownCloud package [1].
We have ownCloud 4.0.4 in testing and 4.0.5 (which fixes RC #681138) in
unstable.
Just a few minutes ago upstream released 4.0.6 with fixes to some security
issues (besides other fixes).
Shall I ask for unblock of 4.0.5 and a few days
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:01:13 +0100
with message-id <5ecde0164d1bff7ab8388b51f4938...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683383: unblock: boxshade/3.3.1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #683383,
regarding unblock: boxshade/3.3.1-7
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:59:18 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#683315: unblock: yagf/0.9.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683315,
regarding unblock: yagf/0.9.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On 07/31/2012 04:20 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> tags 683243 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On 2012-07-30 07:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Dear Release Team,
>>
>> The new Keystone pack
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package transmission
Latest upload has a backported fix for a security vulnerability[0]
Cheers
[0] http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Jul/348
unblock transmission/2.5
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package boxshade because RC bug #683375 was fixed.
Please see debdiff below to see the changes.
unblock boxshade/3.3.1-7
Kind regards and thanks for your work as release tea
On 2012-07-31 12:08, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> On 29 July 2012 12:57, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> According to the BTS, #682818 also affects the version in testing. If
>> so, could you please wait till 1.0.4-4 has migrated. This makes the
>> diff much easier for me to review.
>
> Would you also un
On 29 July 2012 12:57, Niels Thykier wrote:
> According to the BTS, #682818 also affects the version in testing. If
> so, could you please wait till 1.0.4-4 has migrated. This makes the
> diff much easier for me to review.
Would you also unfreeze uploads which fix important bugs (I'm looking
at
Hi,
> We can't unblock something that hasn't been upload yet...
Sponsor has uploaded the package.
Regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4
Hi Niels,
> We cannot really make this decision without knowing what we are
> looking at.
> Please include a debdiff for each option showing the differences
> between the version in testing and the version that option would provide.
Ok, I'll do so as soon as upstream releases the 1.2.2 RC1, whi
Greetings Debian release Managers,
following my previous mails about mmass [0], I would like to perform
an upload of version 5.1.0-2 (currently in testing is version
5.1.0-1).
The debdiff is the following:
debdiff mmass_5.1.0-1.dsc mmass_5.1.0-2.dsc
diff -Nru mmass-5.1.0/debian/changelog mmass-
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock xen/4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-5. It makes it
possible to do real upgrades and fixes some other problems.
xen (4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-5) unstable; urgency
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 683376 + moreinfo
Bug #683376 [release.debian.org] unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683376: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
tags 683376 + moreinfo
thanks
On 2012-07-31 10:47, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package openttd. Recently, upstream developers have
> discovered a security problem in mo
[ CCing da-manager@ to make sure they know that you still fail in
maintaining your packages properly ]
Hi,
so yet again you managed to make a mess of open-vm-tools short time
before a release. open-vm-tools is essential for a lot of people,
running thousands of machines running Debian in a vmware
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package openttd. Recently, upstream developers have
discovered a security problem in most versions of OpenTTD, including the
one in testing.
For squeeze/stable, a fixed packa
Hello Julien,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:11:22AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 22:52:03 +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
>
> > How could we manage to have that new package in Debian stable ? I
> > would not mind removing from unstable the current version so that a
> > new up
Daniel,
if the git commits don't give any more detail/explanation than the
changelog, then they still don't help. You know changelog entries and
git commit messages can be more than just one line...
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:30:10 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> >From 1c91cfeedd6fc2b80050b1293e
On 2012-07-18 13:34, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [...]
>
> There are still 2 problems remaining: lestiff2 (patch in BTS) and cyrus-sasl
> (needs a sourcefull upload to fix binNMU / multiarch problem).
>
A patched version of lesstif2 appears to have been uploaded. To my
knowledge it caused mti
sön 2012-07-29 klockan 12:46 +0200 skrev Niels Thykier:
> On 2012-07-29 06:47, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: freeze-exception
> >
> > unblock bdii/5.2.12-1
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > The bdii pac
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:33:32 +0200
with message-id <5017985c.4070...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#683351: unblock: desktop-base/7.0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #683351,
regarding unblock: desktop-base/7.0.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
On 2012-07-31 00:39, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package e2fsprogs
>
> This fixes a number of fairly serious bugs:
> * It fixes a foreign multiarch bug (#678395), a
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:24:39 +0200
with message-id <20120731082439.gh5...@halon.org.uk>
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #683299,
regarding unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 683243 + moreinfo
Bug #683243 [release.debian.org] unblock: keystone/2012.1.1-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
tags 683243 + moreinfo
thanks
On 2012-07-30 07:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> The new Keystone package, currently available in SID, contains
> reviewed Debcon
On 2012-07-31 09:30, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> I remembered we don't have overrides and thus no Priority or Section
> fields for the extra sources. As even the current values for overrides
> aren't that useful (most source packages have Priority: source), I had
> an alternative
Hi,
Niels Thykier writes:
> On 2012-02-24 01:22, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> I would like to include additional packages referenced by Built-Using in
>> the Sources index[1] at some undefined point in the future. This might
>> confuse britney which would need to just ignore them.
>>
>> Ansgar
>>
75 matches
Mail list logo
