On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 08:21:19PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jakub Wilk has been filing a lot of RC bugs on packages with
> incomplete copyright files. Some examples:
> http://bugs.debian.org/690394
> http://bugs.debian.org/690371
> http://bugs.debian.org/690370
>
> Now, these are
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On 02.10.2012 14:29, Aron Xu wrote:
>>
>> This is a relatively big debdiff, but most of the noise are come from
>> the newly added svg files which show up as text files in diff. These
>> changes are limi
Hi,
Jakub Wilk has been filing a lot of RC bugs on packages with
incomplete copyright files. Some examples:
http://bugs.debian.org/690394
http://bugs.debian.org/690371
http://bugs.debian.org/690370
Now, these are mostly easy fixes and of course in the end completeness
is useful, but with so many
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package scim-chewing
The RC bug #676009 was closed in unstable but then
further uploads were made with unrelated packaging changes
and another RC bug filed for the same issue
tags 679966 + patch
tags 679966 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ksh (versioned as 93u+-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/00. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
RMs: please clear for an upload to t-p-u, thanks.
Regards.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:09:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 12:07 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > unblock to fix #669479, #680896 for wheezy. the split out ppl-config binary
> > is
> > not used by apron and cloog-ppl, so no changes for build dependencies in
> > other
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:19:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 13.10.2012 20:22, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> >Dear RMs, here's an almost identical patch (also, dropping -i as
> >it's also
> >deprecated, and adding VCS headers).
>
> On the whole, this looks fine; thanks. However:
>
> >+ *
> Needing to debug the tools is both a lot more unlikely than debugging
> the library or something that uses it, and easy enough to build a debug
> version of the tool (which you need to do anyway to debug). So I don't
> think this is a problem.
Please review the attached patch, and let me know i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
scim-prime is RC buggy in wheezy but the NMU uploaded
to unstable contains significant changes including replacing
the dpatch build-dependency with source format 3.0 quilt -
including rewriting a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
scim-anthy is RC buggy and out of all the possible fixes, the
only sensible choice is to remove scim-anthy from testing and
reintroduce it via wheezy-backports once that becomes available.
The
I can't see any way for the release team to approve the unblock scim for
the following reasons:
0: it's a new upstream release which is deemed a "significant change"
1: the packaging system has changed to compat 9, another significant
change.
2: new binary packages have been introduced, a furthe
On 13.10.2012 20:22, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
Dear RMs, here's an almost identical patch (also, dropping -i as it's
also
deprecated, and adding VCS headers).
On the whole, this looks fine; thanks. However:
+ * Bump up Standards-Version to 3.9.4
The d-d-a mail announcing the release of po
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package swi-prolog
The new version fixes an rc bug #689583 (incorrect dependencies on
amd64, this causes build failures for depending packages).
Changes in this version:
Thanks Jonathan.
Dear RMs, here's an almost identical patch (also, dropping -i as it's also
deprecated, and adding VCS headers).
Thanks,
sez
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index df8d3cd..4e560e6 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+beanstalkd
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 17:08:33 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> wpa has been updated in unstable for CVE-2012-4445, and subsequently
> unblocked. However it picked up an enhanced dependency on pcsc-lite in
> unstable and hence cannot migrate.
>
> One solution could be to unblock pcsc-li
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 00:41:35 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> A better approach imho would be to simply remove sysklogd from the
> archive. It's dead upstream, apparently no longer properly maintained in
> Debian, and there are enough more then suitable alternatives.
> With rsyslog we even have a
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending d-i
Bug #685960 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnupg/1.4.12-5 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) d-i and pending.
--
685960: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685960
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
T
Control: tag -1 pending d-i
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 18:15:16 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Thu, October 11, 2012 10:07, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On Wed, October 10, 2012 22:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 22:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:22:20 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#688084: Please consider tagging #612918 wheezy-ignore
has caused the Debian Bug report #688084,
regarding Please consider tagging #612918 wheezy-ignore
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On 13.10.2012 18:17, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Please consider the attached patch for beanstalkd to fix
RC bug #687402 (FTBFS, test failure). It must go through TPU.
Hi Serafeim: this also serves as notice to NMU through
DELAYED/2, please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
Looks
On 06.10.2012 00:03, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 19:12:17 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
The package was removed from testing back in May as part of the last
TeXLive transition. Is there a particular justification for trying
to
re-add it now?
At TeXLive transition, I thought
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 02.10.2012 14:29, Aron Xu wrote:
This is a relatively big debdiff, but most of the noise are come from
the newly added svg files which show up as text files in diff. These
changes are limiting the input and install icons to avoid crashing
fcitx main program. Even w
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689425 [release.debian.org] unblock: fcitx-googlepinyin/0.1.6-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
689425: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689425
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCR
tags 687402 + patch
tags 687402 + pending
thanks
Dear RMs,
Please consider the attached patch for beanstalkd to fix
RC bug #687402 (FTBFS, test failure). It must go through TPU.
Hi Serafeim: this also serves as notice to NMU through
DELAYED/2, please feel free to tell me if I should delay it lon
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:06:42 +0100
with message-id <7f951d8a892173ddb536b8b2444b8...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689260: unblock: binfmt-support/2.0.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #689260,
regarding unblock: binfmt-support/2.0.12
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 17:46:20 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#690389: unblock: phpbb3/3.0.10-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #690389,
regarding unblock: phpbb3/3.0.10-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package phpbb3, it fixes an important regression,
#678544, preventing to setup a remote mysql server, and add a new
debconf translation.
The attached debdiff excludes the PO
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689154 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
689154: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689154
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 01.10.2012 12:30, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Samstag, 29. September 2012, Bertrand Marc wrote:
Would you consider to give gnunet 0.9.3-4 a freeze exception ?
This version is not yet uploaded to unstable, my sponsor is waiting
for
your approval.
fwiw, the diff lo
On Thu, October 11, 2012 10:07, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, October 10, 2012 22:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 22:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 23:00 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>>> > Can someone from the release team please confirm that you wo
Hi
On Saturday 13 October 2012, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> wpa has been updated in unstable for CVE-2012-4445, and subsequently
> unblocked. However it picked up an enhanced dependency on pcsc-lite in
> unstable and hence cannot migrate.
>
> One solution could be to unblock pcsc-lite, but
On 13.10.2012 16:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
ftr, the submitter's email bounces:
k...@knok.daionet.gr.jp
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
TO::
host daio.daionet.gr.jp [61.194.16.210]: 554 5.7.1
:
Relay access denied
Regards,
Adam
--
T
On 13.10.2012 16:24, Guo Yixuan wrote:
于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道:
Why is the package's Maintainer field set to someone who has no
obvious
connection with the package?
This is because Samuel did most of the packaging work half a year
ago, and I just updated it to match current gc
Hello!
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:24:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> What's the rationale behind the debhelper compat bumps in gupnp-vala
> and gssdp? They're not really great changes to be making during a
> freeze unless there's some specific reason for it (and even then
> there's ofte
于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 05.10.2012 16:47, Guo Yixuan wrote:
Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc
Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into
wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo, gcj
and gnat)
Hi,
wpa has been updated in unstable for CVE-2012-4445, and subsequently
unblocked. However it picked up an enhanced dependency on pcsc-lite in
unstable and hence cannot migrate.
One solution could be to unblock pcsc-lite, but the feasibility of this I
leave up to the release team.
The other sol
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #690281 [release.debian.org] unblock: file-mmagic/1.29-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
690281: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690281
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 12.10.2012 01:52, NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote:
Please unblock package file-mmagic
Old file-mmagic uses deprecated perl syntax, so I want to unblock it.
The follwing is diff (really small changes):
http://cvs.namazu.org/Subversion/MMagic/trunk/MMagic.pm?r1=286&r2=279
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689727 [release.debian.org] unblock: gcc-4.7-doc/4.7.2-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
689727: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689727
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 05.10.2012 16:55, Guo Yixuan wrote:
Please unblock package gcc-4.7-doc
GCC needs updated documents, but it can only be distributed in
non-free,
not in src:gcc-4.7. So I wish this package to go into wheezy. This
package contains document for gcc-4.7, with all Deb
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689726 [release.debian.org] unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
689726: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689726
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 05.10.2012 16:47, Guo Yixuan wrote:
Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc
Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into
wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo,
gcj
and gnat) in manpages, info, html and pdf.
Why
Michael Biebl dixit:
>A better approach imho would be to simply remove sysklogd from the
>archive.
Please no!
//mirabilos (still ill)
--
Dann mach ich git annex copy --to shore und fertig ist das
das ist ja viel cooler als ownCloud ...
sag ich doch
ja wieso stimmt das denn immer was du sags
r bugfix and a windows only fix.
debian package gained a build dependency on libc-bin >= 2.13-1~ for the
C.UTF-8 locale used in tests.
diff -Nru ipython-0.13.1~20120903/debian/changelog
ipython-0.13.1~20121013/debian/changelog
--- ipython-0.13.1~20120903/debian/changelog2012-09-03 19:42
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #690134 [release.debian.org] unblock: polyorb/2.8~20110207-5
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
690134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690134
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 10.10.2012 11:42, xavier wrote:
Please unblock package polyorb
There is a bug against libpolyorb3 (#688299) in version
2.8~20110207-4.
Version 2.8~20110207-5 remove the diversion and the manpage that was
diverted
and this solve the bug.
For the record, it loo
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:43:48 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the working pinning setup to the
> iceweasel package itself, so that people that add backports source will
> automatically get proper upgrades? Or maybe not, I'm just throwing an
> idea.
>
What do
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 16:29:21 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 20:34:08 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> So, the -dbg issue has to do with way in which debug files are
> >> compared betwen different arch m-
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:11:38 +0100
with message-id <3373c7814569e823f1c0598020ae0...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690042: unblock: ardour/1:2.8.14-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #690042,
regarding unblock: ardour/1:2.8.14-2
to be marked as done.
This mea
Hi Philipp,
On Sat, 13. Oct 13:55 Philipp Kern wrote:
> I just added a removal hint for the following reason:
>
> # 20121013
> # The version in wheezy is unusable (#681680), the new version's diff is too
> # huge. It should instead be shipped via backports and be kept
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:05:27 +0100
with message-id <2d7da2e17c22abaa1b3e5e4b1fb61...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690146: unblock: typo3-src/4.5.19+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #690146,
regarding unblock: typo3-src/4.5.19+dfsg1-2
to be marked as d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 689147 + moreinfo
Bug #689147 [release.debian.org] unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
689147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=68914
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #690196 [release.debian.org] unblock: udj-desktop-client/0.6.1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
690196: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690196
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCR
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 11.10.2012 03:49, Nathan Handler wrote:
Please unblock package udj-desktop-client
udj-desktop-client 0.5.1-2 is currently in testing. Upstream has
released a new API and prepared an updated version of
udj-desktop-client
to use this new API. They are currently wor
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689698 [release.debian.org] unblock: gupnp/0.10.3-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
689698: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689698
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 05.10.2012 10:34, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Please unblock packages in the gupnp stack
The upstream stable series bugfix updates has been sitting in
unstable for over a month now without a single bug reported.
The updates improves interopability with DLNA devices
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:37:17 +0100
with message-id <3f0faa8f66149084f02f2050197b1...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690348: unblock: gtkmm3.0/3.4.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690348,
regarding unblock: gtkmm3.0/3.4.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:34:19 +0100
with message-id <30e50ed778fd1b63c8df254889e73...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690357: unblock: hddtemp/0.3-beta15-52
has caused the Debian Bug report #690357,
regarding unblock: hddtemp/0.3-beta15-52
to be marked as done.
Le vendredi, 12 octobre 2012 13.17:30, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> > What's your take there ? The above modprobe is currently in unstable but
> > we can either a) drop it completely; b) make it modprobe -b.
>
> Either works for me, with a slight preference for option a.
Uploaded, with b), as 1.5.3
On 13.10.2012 09:43, Mike Hommey wrote:
> That being said, I think we should actively advise people to use
> backports for iceweasel. Making that statement part of the release notes
> might be a good idea. Possibly with a working pinning setup.
>
> Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the work
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:41:08AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 07:13:08AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for maintaining Iceweasel/Icedove.
> >
> > Now I have a question about its release/update schedule.
> > As http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 07:13:08AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for maintaining Iceweasel/Icedove.
>
> Now I have a question about its release/update schedule.
> As http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/ says, they'll
> terminate Firefox 10.0.x ESR and move
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package hddtemp
This version fixes #680877 that interrupts installation of Xfce
systems from scratch with an unnecessary debconf question.
Even though this is not a release
63 matches
Mail list logo
