Hi!
Yes, that would work for me.
* Adam D. Barratt [120110 22:33]:
> press@, -live - ping?
>
> > > > As an opening gambit, I'd propose we look at one of the following
> > > > Saturdays in January: 14th, 21st, 28th.
> > > 21st and 28th (with the respective day after the actual release day, to
>
On 01/10/2012 10:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The 28th would be preferable for me. Would that still work for everyone
> else?
2011-01-28 (and the day afterwards) is fine, yes.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologi
press@, -live - ping?
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 20:12 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 22:41 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > On 12/13/2011 12:07 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > As an opening gambit, I'd propose we look at one of the following
> > > Saturdays in January: 14th, 21
>> > As an opening gambit, I'd propose we look at one of the following
>> > Saturdays in January: 14th, 21st, 28th.
>> 21st and 28th (with the respective day after the actual release day, to
>> do the live images) are fine for me.
> The 28th would be preferable for me. Would that still work for e
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:12:39PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
>On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 22:41 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> On 12/13/2011 12:07 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > As an opening gambit, I'd propose we look at one of the following
>> > Saturdays in January: 14th, 21st, 28th.
>>
>> 21st a
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 22:41 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 12:07 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > As an opening gambit, I'd propose we look at one of the following
> > Saturdays in January: 14th, 21st, 28th.
>
> 21st and 28th (with the respective day after the actual release day, to
>
I'm sorry but as fascinating as this is this discussion between you two
(Adam and Daniel) is it is not educational, informative or constructive and
has nothing to do, now, with anything that any of us Plebian live users
need to know about.
Have a great weekend [?]
Michael
<<35C.png>>
On 16.12.2011 08:39, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 12/15/2011 11:19 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Then I suspect you haven't read the above. Hopefully it does some
good
for someone, in any case.
it is always a good thing to allege the other one is not reading
stuff
if the initial problem solely lie
On 12/15/2011 11:19 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> (and to which you appear to have ignored the response, at least
> publicly)
that response was a non-sequitur.
> That mail says you'd like to know "the rough estimated date" for
> planning purposes, [...]
exactely..
> The purpose of the initial co
[If you're going to set reply-to in order to not get CCed on replies,
please consider not CCing others on your own follow-ups]
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 23:01 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 10:50 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > For the record, I did not forget. I was under the impression
On 12/15/2011 10:50 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> For the record, I did not forget. I was under the impression that what
> you'd previously requested, and what we had agreed, was that you wished
> to be copied on the mails announcing the dates of the point releases,
no; i said it numerous times al
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 22:41 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 12:07 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Yep, it's that time again. Based on a bi-monthly schedule, 6.0.4 would
> > be due around mid-January.
>
> again and again, you forget to cc debian-live. this is going on for too
> long al
On 12/13/2011 12:07 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Yep, it's that time again. Based on a bi-monthly schedule, 6.0.4 would
> be due around mid-January.
again and again, you forget to cc debian-live. this is going on for too
long already, fix this, finally, i'm getting sick of it.
> As an opening ga
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:07:32PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Yep, it's that time again. Based on a bi-monthly schedule, 6.0.4 would
>be due around mid-January.
>
>We may want to adjust timings a little, so that we don't end up trying
>to set deadlines for things like kernel and d-i change
Hi!
Am 13.12.2011 00:07, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> As an opening gambit, I'd propose we look at one of the following
> Saturdays in January: 14th, 21st, 28th.
Would all work for me.
Best regards,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:07:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Yep, it's that time again. Based on a bi-monthly schedule, 6.0.4 would
> be due around mid-January.
>
> We may want to adjust timings a little, so that we don't end up trying
> to set deadlines for things like kernel and d-i chang
Hi,
Yep, it's that time again. Based on a bi-monthly schedule, 6.0.4 would
be due around mid-January.
We may want to adjust timings a little, so that we don't end up trying
to set deadlines for things like kernel and d-i changes being ready over
the holiday period.
As an opening gambit, I'd pro
17 matches
Mail list logo
