On Lu, 28 iun 10, 13:38:47, Arthur Machlas wrote:
> >> 1) ext2 to image / from my debian install. 50GB so I could have two or
> >> three "snapshots"
> >
> > Why ext2? I don't see any reason to use something less than ext3 for
> > "regular" operations.
> >
>
> Ext2 because who needs journaling? It
>> 1) ext2 to image / from my debian install. 50GB so I could have two or
>> three "snapshots"
>
> Why ext2? I don't see any reason to use something less than ext3 for
> "regular" operations.
>
Ext2 because who needs journaling? It will have three, maybe four
files on it, each about 10GB. Correct
On Mi, 23 iun 10, 10:22:29, Arthur Machlas wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I just purchased a 1.5 WD sata II HD and enclosure connected via USB
> after an unfortunate incident involve rm -rf, something called "home"
> and a bicycle. It's purpose will be two-fold: As a back-up device for
> two laptops (HD
On 06/23/2010 10:22 AM, Arthur Machlas wrote:
Greetings,
I just purchased a 1.5 WD sata II HD and enclosure connected via USB
after an unfortunate incident involve rm -rf, something called "home"
and a bicycle. It's purpose will be two-fold: As a back-up device for
two laptops (HD sizes 500GB an
Greetings,
I just purchased a 1.5 WD sata II HD and enclosure connected via USB
after an unfortunate incident involve rm -rf, something called "home"
and a bicycle. It's purpose will be two-fold: As a back-up device for
two laptops (HD sizes 500GB and 120GB), and as a central storage
device for mo
5 matches
Mail list logo
