Is there any time pressure or any other pressure for us to release this
package now? I think Kubernetes is highly anticipated by users and it is
worth considering the arguments that motivate us to make a given decision.
-1 to release without cncf.kubernetes and an incomplete google package
(withou
+1 to release without cncf.kubernetes
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 6:27 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> (though of course releasing it without Kubernetes might be a little less
> exciting Daniel ;)
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:25 PM Jarek Potiuk
> wrote:
>
>> We have 2 +1s now and the comment about the 'cnc
(though of course releasing it without Kubernetes might be a little less
exciting Daniel ;)
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:25 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> We have 2 +1s now and the comment about the 'cncf.kubernetes" not yet
> working.
>
> My proposal:
>
> * we continue with the voting (hopefully one more
We have 2 +1s now and the comment about the 'cncf.kubernetes" not yet
working.
My proposal:
* we continue with the voting (hopefully one more +1) and release all the
sources + backport but do nto publish the cncf.kubernetes one.
* we fix (who can take a look?) the cncf.kubernetes one and release
Hi all,
I would like to remind whoever is interested in helping in Airflow 2.0
Release process that
we will have our weekly developer call today:
*Airflow 2.0 Dev Call Calendar Link*:
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=c_dhdh3bdjc42c4ngtnpg7ovcs9g%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=Europ
It was indeed quite annoying.
A better solution is in place now (Just merged it). You will see Build
Image steps with link as "checks" if you need them and in case "Build
Image" fails, the bot will post a comment with link where you will be able
to find out the reason.
J.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at
Thank You for the thoughts. I will create a VOTE thread at some point today
/ early tomorrow.
Regards,
Kaxil
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 6:11 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Happy to kill pickling for 2.0. While starting to review the HA, I see
> that more and more we rely on Serialization and there are s
Hi All,
I created this small doc for AIP. Wanted to discuss the feasibility as well
as my understanding of the problem/solution.
*TLDR; Feasibility to use task exit code as branching condition for
downstream task scheduling*
Thank you in advance.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OGwnF9igWS5b6
Dear
Good Day !!
We have a plan to run Airflow on Kubernetes Operators but the documentation
is limited to start the setup on Ubuntu 18.x.
So, could you please share the required steps in details to proceed further.
*Best Regards*
*Vara*
OK. I found a better solution :) . PR is coming :).
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:21 AM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Based on comments of people and questions asked at Slack, I've added a few
> improvements to t our optimized CI builds but I would like to ask for
> help/opinion.
>
> 1) I
Hello everyone,
Based on comments of people and questions asked at Slack, I've added a few
improvements to t our optimized CI builds but I would like to ask for
help/opinion.
1) I've fixed a problem where we were building slightly different build
than the "merged commit" in PR. Github performs a
11 matches
Mail list logo
